[argyllcms] Re: Something is wrong
- From: <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 07:22:25 -0500
Yves,
In general, to get the best results possible, should we just pruned out
these
outliers? Would taking multiple measures of the patches and use the
average
or the "median" be a good practice or just a waste of time?
You need to understand what you're doing. In the context that the device
(paper) is highly non-linear, *all* the patches are important to build a
model of the output.
Is there a way you can start with a tiny patch set? Instead of the full
1000+?
That way, less chances of errors. I seem to remember, a long time ago, that
Argyll was able to make profiles from as low as 60 some patches. If that was
still the case, you could make all the measurements one at a time (if the
software allows manual reading) and analyze each patch. You need to better
understand what you're measuring to be able to tell if there is something
wrong with the generated profile. That's what I do. You have to understand
the underlying device behavior from the measurements.
/ Roger
Other related posts:
