My thoughts are that profiling in negative scanning workflows is doing little more than providing a rough guide for the interpretative edits which are always required. A scanner cannot get RGB values from negative that have any dependable relationship with the colorimetry of the original scene. That's the whole point of using negative -- massive exposure range recorded using minimal density range. And given that the scanned values don't correspond to the colorimetry of the final print either, I can't see profiling playing anything other than a very minor part in the image processing. -- Martin Orpen Idea Digital Imaging Ltd Sent from my iPod Touch > >> >>