[argyllcms] Re: Number of patches - well behaved printer?

  • From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:19:10 +1100

edmund ronald wrote:
  I wasn't asking you, who are a specialist doing proofing; I was
asking the OP who appears to be a photographer doing fine art work.

Edmund, nowhere did the OP (Terry Ritz) specify what the end use was,
nor did the post from Don Craig that you responded to. So you
can't assume that it is or is not photography, or even
one and not the other. Now proofing tends to be the most critical
use because there is a reference print to objectively and visually
match to, but I hardly think that it's unjustifiable that some
Photographers aspire to produce the best possible prints as well.

Graeme Gill.

Other related posts: