[argyllcms] Re: Number of patches - well behaved printer?
- From: Iliah Borg <ib@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:18:28 -0500
Dear Rishi,
> "Alternatively, profiles done from targets shot using different exposures are
> in wide use; operator just selects the proper proper profile based on visual."
>
> Really? What software packages use this principle? Not Adobe products, or
> digiKam, or RPP from what I know... I'm curious!
>
I'm sorry but I do not understand what is the issue. One can surely make
different profiles for differently exposed target shots; or films scanned
(think Vuescan) with different in-scanner exposure settings; than, opening an
image, to go through profiles and see which one suits better.
If you are asking about combining targets - which is a whole different question
- than yes, one needs to do some job composing a CGATS file and combining
bitmaps for a standard profiler to chew those. But that is relatively
straightforward too.
--
Iliah Borg
ib@xxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
