[argyllcms] Re: ColorMunki measurement drift

  • From: Roger Breton <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:26:51 -0400

Still have not had the chance to compare Munki with EyeOnePro with DTP94
with Spyder3 with EyeOneDisplayII with Spectrocam with Minolta CS-100 with
Photo-Research PR-704 but I hope to find a moment to do that soon, for you


/ Roger


From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of János, Tóth F.
Sent: 1 octobre 2010 06:02
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: ColorMunki measurement drift


So, what is the conclusion?

It is confirmed that the readings are much more stable after the
acclimatization. (It is understandable.)

But what about the absolute accuracy? I think I would trust in the very
first measurements. If the instrument doesn't work with temperature
compensation than it should be accurate at the standard room temperature.
Isn't it?
So, a "warm-up" can produce much more stable but drifted results.

May be we should apply a software based temperature compensation, like the
existing one for the colorimeters. (A correction between the standard room
temperature and the acclimatized temperature.)

Other related posts: