Hello Charlie Dan:
While I agree with most of what you said, there is an important distinction....
Our Country is founded on the SETTLED METAPHYSICS OF NATURAL LAW.
During the Enlightenment (1650ad to 1800), even the MEN OF LETTERS, were quick
to pointout they were not creating anything, merely reducing to writing that
which had always been.
Most of the Men of Letters ascribed Natural Law and Natural Rights as being
gifts from God.(For the less devout, the secular version is that Natural Law
and Natural Rights are innate or
inherent in every individual human being.
So common was the knowledge of Natural Rights among the masses, the
Constitution wasdrafted without a Bill of Rights. The debate raged between
those who argued Natural Rightswere self evident and those who warned they must
be reduced to writing in the document
in anticipation of future tyrants. A few years later the Amendments that were
submitted asthe Bill of Rights were ratified and became the first 10 Amendments
aka Bill of Rights.
The Bill of Rights is merely the relisting of certain of the Natural Rights we
all have.And the 9th Amendment says that even if some of the NATURAL RIGHTS are
not specificallylisted, they remain with the people and the States.
The point being the unalienable Natural Rights of People do not come from
written documentsour country was founded upon, but rather exist at all times.
But they must be protected and enforced by the force and will of WE THE PEOPLE,
not the government or the Courts.
Governments only exist by "Consent of the Governed" through Social
Contracts.Unalienable Natural Rights exist even in the Natural State, even
before Government.The trick is having sufficient power to enforce your Natural
Rights.
What is happening in our country right now is the result of WE THE PEOPLE
failingto resist and oppose tyrants such as judges, and Government Lawyers.
Your thoughts please.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Monday, September 13, 2021, 04:51:26 PM CDT, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Constitution of the United States of America is law as in by-laws. It
references the organic law which includes three more documents: Declaration of
Independance, Articles of Confederation and Northwest Ordinance. Article 1,
section 8, clause 17 defines jurisdiction; Article 6 first paragraph defines
law.
If they are hell bent on one constitutional law to violate. It does not how
many laws you mention but still bring them up because they are now crimes and
not just financial Restitution.
Hell bent means the whole County and state will deny your constitutional rights
and these employees are enjoying the party of ignoring their company by-laws
granted to them to exist. Enjoying you struggle in frustrating. One may want to
inform these lower employees that you will or are reporting to corporate.
Corporate office is via: United States Court of Federal Claims. Make sure you
approach the court as a sovereign with a petition to government for the by-law
laws being violated. By-laws is the Constitution of the United States of
America. If done right the Corporate office/United States will send you a
letter of apology of the employees hurting you. Compensation is also going to
happen and if incarcerated, released. That is your back up and last strategy to
win. In that USCFC it is you a creation of God as a sovereign and the United
States a crayon of man a sovereign. Acct accordingly when conversing. Treat the
United States as an corporatiin you want to keep around but want the employees
to straighten up.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 3:30 PM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
yes but that also puts you into a position though also. yes since the ticket
or whatever is on them. The burden of proof is on them you want to fix your
status so you have and can back up your Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17 in the
event they decide to go around that.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 4:46 PM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
wouldnt charley's claim of no Jurisdiction under Constitution Article 1 Section
8 Clause 17 working??
VACATE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.....
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of J_B
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 4:44 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: refreshers you should have
fixed your status buddy. No ticket in most cases.. depends if the pigs want to
ignore the status
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 4:36 PM Mike P <mike_p_5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I will tell you WHO gets away with these "niceties" - the ILLEGALS they have NO
status and as such they are considered "sovereign." I found this out when a
freggin illegal mexican cause my accident AND I had witnessess. NOTHING was
done to her as she was illegally here with NO license and NO registration so
she got off scott free while I was threatened WITH a ticket BECAUSE I damaged
MY auto over $500.00
WHAT a JOKE!!!! But I wasn't surprised because I have been doing long enough
to know exactly what was happening AND why.
From:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Rick
Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 3:19 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: refreshers All of these
cases are great, but what court would actually recognize them and apply real
law to a man or woman? The courts are as corrupt as the rest of this planet.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 1:13 PM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
“The rights of sovereignty extend to all persons and things, not privileged
that are within the territory. They extend to allstrangers resident therein;
not only to those who are naturalized, and to those who are domiciled therein,
having taken up their abode with the intention of permanent residence, but also
to those whose residence is transitory. Allstrangers are under the protection
of the sovereign while they are within his territory and owe a temporary
allegiance in return for that protection.” Carlisle v United States 83 U.S.
147, 154 (1873)
“Let a State be considered as subordinate to the People: But let everything
else be subordinate to the State.”Chisholm v Georgia 2 US 419 at 455
"The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a
Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of
citizen created by Congress." U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)
--
Life in one word--LOVE