Got it.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Wednesday, September 15, 2021, 11:40 AM, Mike P <mike_p_5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
#yiv8459901353 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}yes....😂
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Jb
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 11:18 AM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: refreshers Did I just read
right below “PENIS”?
On Sep 15, 2021, at 11:37 AM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Articles of Conferring is alive and operating. If not, there is no The
United Stars of America. Read the articles of confederation and it talks of
this being a friendship agreement and we honor each other, protect life,
liberty, and property. Northwest Ordinance Article 14 describes one has to have
a claim etc. That whole thing is a private compact or agreement to honor and
that is the law of the country. Article 6 states penis agreements and article
of Confederation is servings statue at large a lawful document
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 3:44 AM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charly, i am getting most of what you are stating.
However, i am a little sense.
How foes Article VI of the Constitution make what the law enforcement officer
does by issuing a summons or ticket Color of Law?
Article. VI.
[1.] All Debts contracted andEngagements entered into, before the Adoption of
this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this
Constitution, as under the Confederation.
[2.] This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made
in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the
Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the
Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or
Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
From:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Charley
Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 9:36 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: refreshers I'm a United
States of America NationalArticle 1, section 8, clause 17Not an United States
CitizenVacate for lack of jurisdictonArticle 6 color of law.
Send and forget. That notice makes it a crime if violated. I'm going to be
trying and anyone can volunteer but I believe when one signs the ticket put
next to signature: Article 6 color of lawThen tell officer I just served you
notice when you hand ticket back. If the officer turns the ticket in to the
court. One could file immediately for damages and he should be charged with a
crime. That would be done in DC.
I just receive from a friend a COL form. Color of law form. It was a notice to
whoever you gave it to that also stated you are committing an felony and you
might consider getting an attorney. So it backs up what I've thought but now
know. I would say this is more important then filing bar complaints. If it
fails file in DC and I'll help with that because it's not as simple or I have
not got it simple yet.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 6:01 PM Emb Had <ecclesia.rockheights@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can I get a copy of Charlie constitional claim doc?
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021, 4:51 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Constitution of the United States of America is law as in by-laws. It
references the organic law which includes three more documents: Declaration of
Independance, Articles of Confederation and Northwest Ordinance. Article 1,
section 8, clause 17 defines jurisdiction; Article 6 first paragraph defines
law.
If they are hell bent on one constitutional law to violate. It does not how
many laws you mention but still bring them up because they are now crimes and
not just financial Restitution.
Hell bent means the whole County and state will deny your constitutional rights
and these employees are enjoying the party of ignoring their company by-laws
granted to them to exist. Enjoying you struggle in frustrating. One may want to
inform these lower employees that you will or are reporting to corporate.
Corporate office is via: United States Court of Federal Claims. Make sure you
approach the court as a sovereign with a petition to government for the by-law
laws being violated. By-laws is the Constitution of the United States of
America. If done right the Corporate office/United States will send you a
letter of apology of the employees hurting you. Compensation is also going to
happen and if incarcerated, released. That is your back up and last strategy to
win. In that USCFC it is you a creation of God as a sovereign and the United
States a crayon of man a sovereign. Acct accordingly when conversing. Treat the
United States as an corporatiin you want to keep around but want the employees
to straighten up.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 3:30 PM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
yes but that also puts you into a position though also. yes since the ticket
or whatever is on them. The burden of proof is on them you want to fix your
status so you have and can back up your Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17 in the
event they decide to go around that.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 4:46 PM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
wouldnt charley's claim of no Jurisdiction under Constitution Article 1 Section
8 Clause 17 working??
VACATE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.....
From:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of J_B
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 4:44 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: refreshers you should have
fixed your status buddy. No ticket in most cases.. depends if the pigs want to
ignore the status
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 4:36 PM Mike P <mike_p_5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I will tell you WHO gets away with these "niceties" - the ILLEGALS they have NO
status and as such they are considered "sovereign." I found this out when a
freggin illegal mexican cause my accident AND I had witnessess. NOTHING was
done to her as she was illegally here with NO license and NO registration so
she got off scott free while I was threatened WITH a ticket BECAUSE I damaged
MY auto over $500.00
WHAT a JOKE!!!! But I wasn't surprised because I have been doing long enough
to know exactly what was happening AND why.
From:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Rick
Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 3:19 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: refreshers All of these
cases are great, but what court would actually recognize them and apply real
law to a man or woman? The courts are as corrupt as the rest of this planet.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 1:13 PM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
“The rights of sovereignty extend to all persons and things, not privileged
that are within the territory. They extend to all strangers resident therein;
not only to those who are naturalized, and to those who are domiciled therein,
having taken up their abode with the intention of permanent residence, but also
to those whose residence is transitory. Allstrangers are under the protection
of the sovereign while they are within his territory and owe a temporary
allegiance in return for that protection.” Carlisle v United States 83 U.S.
147, 154 (1873)
“Let a State be considered as subordinate to the People: But let everything
else be subordinate to the State.”Chisholm v Georgia 2 US 419 at 455
"The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a
Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of
citizen created by Congress." U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)
--
Life in one word--LOVE
--
Life in one word--LOVE
--
Life in one word--LOVE
