For Info only, I recently bought a document from Tools for Freedom, called "The
Power od Commercial Liens over Corrupt Bureaucrats' #3371website
http://www.mind-trek.com/practicl/comliens.htmhttp://Lien.fmotL.comArticles ;
from Al Adask and Phillip Marsh included
On Monday, September 13, 2021, 04:52:17 PM CDT, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Constitution of the United States of America is law as in by-laws. It
references the organic law which includes three more documents: Declaration of
Independance, Articles of Confederation and Northwest Ordinance. Article 1,
section 8, clause 17 defines jurisdiction; Article 6 first paragraph defines
law.
If they are hell bent on one constitutional law to violate. It does not how
many laws you mention but still bring them up because they are now crimes and
not just financial Restitution.
Hell bent means the whole County and state will deny your constitutional rights
and these employees are enjoying the party of ignoring their company by-laws
granted to them to exist. Enjoying you struggle in frustrating. One may want to
inform these lower employees that you will or are reporting to corporate.
Corporate office is via: United States Court of Federal Claims. Make sure you
approach the court as a sovereign with a petition to government for the by-law
laws being violated. By-laws is the Constitution of the United States of
America. If done right the Corporate office/United States will send you a
letter of apology of the employees hurting you. Compensation is also going to
happen and if incarcerated, released. That is your back up and last strategy to
win. In that USCFC it is you a creation of God as a sovereign and the United
States a crayon of man a sovereign. Acct accordingly when conversing. Treat the
United States as an corporatiin you want to keep around but want the employees
to straighten up.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 3:30 PM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
yes but that also puts you into a position though also. yes since the ticket
or whatever is on them. The burden of proof is on them you want to fix your
status so you have and can back up your Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17 in the
event they decide to go around that.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 4:46 PM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
wouldnt charley's claim of no Jurisdiction under Constitution Article 1 Section
8 Clause 17 working??
VACATE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.....
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of J_B
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 4:44 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: refreshers you should have
fixed your status buddy. No ticket in most cases.. depends if the pigs want to
ignore the status
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 4:36 PM Mike P <mike_p_5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I will tell you WHO gets away with these "niceties" - the ILLEGALS they have NO
status and as such they are considered "sovereign." I found this out when a
freggin illegal mexican cause my accident AND I had witnessess. NOTHING was
done to her as she was illegally here with NO license and NO registration so
she got off scott free while I was threatened WITH a ticket BECAUSE I damaged
MY auto over $500.00
WHAT a JOKE!!!! But I wasn't surprised because I have been doing long enough
to know exactly what was happening AND why.
From:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Rick
Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 3:19 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: refreshers All of these
cases are great, but what court would actually recognize them and apply real
law to a man or woman? The courts are as corrupt as the rest of this planet.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 1:13 PM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
“The rights of sovereignty extend to all persons and things, not privileged
that are within the territory. They extend to allstrangers resident therein;
not only to those who are naturalized, and to those who are domiciled therein,
having taken up their abode with the intention of permanent residence, but also
to those whose residence is transitory. Allstrangers are under the protection
of the sovereign while they are within his territory and owe a temporary
allegiance in return for that protection.” Carlisle v United States 83 U.S.
147, 154 (1873)
“Let a State be considered as subordinate to the People: But let everything
else be subordinate to the State.”Chisholm v Georgia 2 US 419 at 455
"The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a
Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of
citizen created by Congress." U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)
--
Life in one word--LOVE