i forgot to mention since i was in a bit of a rush, you can take the quote
and punch it into google scholar too without the court case and you should
get the same result you would like from what i stated in the last email
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021, 7:29 AM veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
if you would like a cheat way to follow up with case quotes. you can take
the quote with the court case at the end like glenn did, and run it through
google scholar and put the settings to show the most recent (if it isnt
already after you punch the search in)
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021, 7:17 AM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/357/513/
also
Speiser v. Randall, 357 U.S. 513 (1958)
*From: *Winningham Fearn <winfearn@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent: *Friday, March 19, 2021 11:10 PM
*To: *administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
Administrating-Your-Public-Servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject: *[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: do I lose any
position by not responding to an email from a superior court judge
•*“The power to create presumptions is not a means of escape from
constitutional restrictions.”* Bailey v Alabama, 219 U.S. 219, 238, et
seq., 31 S.Ct. 145; Manley v Georgia, 279 U.S. 1, 5-6, 49 S.Ct. 215
Best Regards,
Win
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:57 AM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I do not believe he read the complaints in which we claim Sovereign
status etc. He may have assumed we were citizens of the United State
property.
Get Outlook for Android
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2FAAb9ysg&data=04%7C01%7C%7C15421a63e2be4938fc6408d8eb4da74b%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637518066036655180%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=n6hIJtJsPVhPD1iLWDDkV1Cvpa3uKukyj5qEG97uc2M%3D&reserved=0>
*From:* NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Friday, March 19, 2021 11:39:22 AM
*To:* administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Administrating-your-public-servants <
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* Re: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: do I lose any
position by not responding to an email from a superior court judge
Yes. Is a judicial complaint a criminal offense
Get Outlook for Android
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2FAAb9ysg&data=04%7C01%7C%7C15421a63e2be4938fc6408d8eb4da74b%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637518066036665173%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=sbBVSWBPFYJ%2F12a5z0QniDt4qePHy%2BWlFtOKNqn6%2Fh4%3D&reserved=0>
*From:* administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Me <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Friday, March 19, 2021 11:11:06 AM
*To:* administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Administrating-your-public-servants <
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: do I lose any
position by not responding to an email from a superior court judge
I would use that as evidence for a Judicial complaint because he knows
what proper service is and he is using that to threaten you and intimidate
you. That is perjury of oath.
Best Regards, Glenn
On Friday, March 19, 2021, 07:10:06 AM CDT, NELSON DICE <
nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
The "order" was sent by email.
I did not respond.
Maybe they can use the all caps name on the papers to get some credit.
We will keep updating.
Thanks
Get Outlook for Android
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2FAAb9ysg&data=04%7C01%7C%7C15421a63e2be4938fc6408d8eb4da74b%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637518066036665173%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=sbBVSWBPFYJ%2F12a5z0QniDt4qePHy%2BWlFtOKNqn6%2Fh4%3D&reserved=0>
*From:* administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Me <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Friday, March 19, 2021 1:28:11 AM
*To:* administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: do I lose any
position by not responding to an email from a superior court judge
I would reject their offer of contract within 72 hours pursuant to
Regulation Z, Truth in Lending
Best Regards, Glenn
On Tuesday, March 16, 2021, 02:53:04 PM CDT, NELSON DICE <
nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am not responding at all.
The supposed ORDER was sent by email to me the morning AFTER my recent
presentation to CITY COUNCIL when I notified the Mayor with Evidence
presented that his City Solicitor and two other public servants were
guilty of Official Misconduct and that he should contact the State AG if
he didn’t know what to do.
My friend Miii, used to tell me that Courts fabricate papers and lie ALL
the time.
This email ORDER is a case in point.
They stamped a fake FILE date of Feb 5 and then claim a Zoom conference
was scheduled for March 9.
COMPLETE FRAUD……
Thanks to everyone
*From: *Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent: *Tuesday, March 16, 2021 2:52 PM
*To: *administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject: *[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: do I lose any
position by not responding to an email from a superior court judge
To keep it legal they have to go through mail. As for email there might
be rules. But I’d stick to tried and true. Mail correspondence. don’t think
email stands as evidence too much in a court of law but they may be
dependent on circumstances. What’s the case on. I think I missed that in
the chain. Are you answering as fiction?
On Mar 16, 2021, at 2:23 PM, Mikee Siano (Redacted sender "mikee1987" for
DMARC) <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
They have to at least mail it to you I know from when I served my
summons there Is a rule that states a waiver is signed by the defense to
wave service process to stop the high fees that can be incurred in the
process of service .. you must get the waiver from the plaintiff in the
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 16, 2021, at 2:02 PM, NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://www.serve-now.com/resources/process-serving-laws/new-jersey#443
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.serve-now.com%2Fresources%2Fprocess-serving-laws%2Fnew-jersey%23443&data=04%7C01%7C%7C15421a63e2be4938fc6408d8eb4da74b%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637518066036675170%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=J9SHUHPkFsQWiM6C3Yuj78kPpB8cwBIi4BjvFy2A9U4%3D&reserved=0>
Even though proper service was not attempted, and only received an email,
am I obliged to respond to an email??????
