A state nationals court and law is and can be used in any and all courts of the
United States.
On Mar 24, 2021, 6:15 PM -0600, Victor <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Iv'e read that United States District Court (admiralty) and District Court of
the United States (common law) are two different courts and two different
jurisdictions. I haven't fact checked it because I haven't had a reason to
but it might be something worth looking in to.
By: Victor: Swope family
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Monday, March 22, 2021 11:20 PM, Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When you say, file in the United States District Court, are you paying the
court's filing fee Charley and opening a case in their corporate court ?
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 7:17 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tax lens?
File in the United States District Court a claim for property taxes you
paid to date.
Start out with Judicial Notice: The constitution of the United States
of America Article 1, section,8, clause 17 I'm a state national Not an
United States Citizen. Then judicial notice any other constitution
article that supports your claim but I'm about ready to try with that
one claim. The magistrate may try and tell you s/he does not have
jurisdicton. To that one states that the state national has
jurisdiction and that the court just needs to fulfill id's obligation
to the constitution as administrator of the state national court. Never
know what excuse they may play trying to avoid their lost of power, but
the hard part is over.
On Mar 22, 2021, 7:16 PM -0600, Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
You might want to go to Utube and check out Alphonse Faggiolo.
He is getting results against the corporate farce w/include tax
liens.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:38 PM Paul M
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I get letters saying the County filed a tax lien on my property
and it will go to auction, received 3 so far. I know it is a
hoax, even sent copies to local Sheriff (no response), think I
might have to inquire from County if this threat is valid? Your
thoughts please
On Sunday, March 21, 2021, 4:00:15 PM CDT, Fred Wind
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
from what ive read you must have signed a waiver or agreement to
receive anything from another party, if full disclosure was not
given then there can be no consent or waiver to give, mail
carriers are not bonded process servers and the legal system
hopes you dont catch the fraud and proceed on implied consent,
the hoax is revealed when there is NO AFFIDAVIT attached or
recorded\filed with the clerk of court saying you were positively
served with legal documents summoning you to court, never argue,
ask questions or state an unrebuttable FACT instead, keeps from
traversing into their jurisdiction
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 2:53 PM, Jb
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To keep it legal they have to go through mail. As for email
there might be rules. But I’d stick to tried and true. Mail
correspondence. don’t think email stands as evidence too much
in a court of law but they may be dependent on circumstances.
What’s the case on. I think I missed that in the chain. Are you
answering as fiction?
On Mar 16, 2021, at 2:23 PM, Mikee Siano (Redacted senderThey have to at least mail it to you I know from when I served
"mikee1987" for DMARC) <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
my summons there Is a rule that states a waiver is signed by
the defense to wave service process to stop the high fees that
can be incurred in the process of service .. you must get the
waiver from the plaintiff in the mail
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 16, 2021, at 2:02 PM, NELSON DICEhttps://www.serve-now.com/resources/process-serving-laws/new-jersey#443
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Even though proper service was not attempted, and only received
an email, am I obliged to respond to an email??????
