Thanks Charlie.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 2:59 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have been most of the time but one now where we motioned the court fees
vacated on judicial notice of the constitutional article that courts are
free. Will see
On Mar 22, 2021, 9:59 PM -0600, Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
When you say, file in the United States District Court, are you paying the
court's filing fee Charley and opening a case in their corporate court ?
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 7:17 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tax lens?
File in the United States District Court a claim for property taxes you
paid to date.
Start out with Judicial Notice: The constitution of the United States of
America Article 1, section,8, clause 17 I'm a state national Not an United
States Citizen. Then judicial notice any other constitution article that
supports your claim but I'm about ready to try with that one claim. The
magistrate may try and tell you s/he does not have jurisdicton. To that one
states that the state national has jurisdiction and that the court just
needs to fulfill id's obligation to the constitution as administrator of
the state national court. Never know what excuse they may play trying to
avoid their lost of power, but the hard part is over.
On Mar 22, 2021, 7:16 PM -0600, Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
You might want to go to Utube and check out Alphonse Faggiolo. He is
getting results against the corporate farce w/include tax liens.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:38 PM Paul M <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I get letters saying the County filed a tax lien on my property and it
will go to auction, received 3 so far. I know it is a hoax, even sent
copies to local Sheriff (no response), think I might have to inquire from
County if this threat is valid? Your thoughts please
On Sunday, March 21, 2021, 4:00:15 PM CDT, Fred Wind <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
from what ive read you must have signed a waiver or agreement to receive
anything from another party, if full disclosure was not given then there
can be no consent or waiver to give, mail carriers are not bonded process
servers and the legal system hopes you dont catch the fraud and proceed on
implied consent, the hoax is revealed when there is NO AFFIDAVIT attached
or recorded\filed with the clerk of court saying you were positively served
with legal documents summoning you to court, never argue, ask questions or
state an unrebuttable FACT instead, keeps from traversing into their
jurisdiction
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
<https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 2:53 PM, Jb
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To keep it legal they have to go through mail. As for email there might
be rules. But I’d stick to tried and true. Mail correspondence. don’t think
email stands as evidence too much in a court of law but they may be
dependent on circumstances. What’s the case on. I think I missed that in
the chain. Are you answering as fiction?
On Mar 16, 2021, at 2:23 PM, Mikee Siano (Redacted sender "mikee1987"
for DMARC) <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
They have to at least mail it to you I know from when I served my
summons there Is a rule that states a waiver is signed by the defense to
wave service process to stop the high fees that can be incurred in the
process of service .. you must get the waiver from the plaintiff in the
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 16, 2021, at 2:02 PM, NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://www.serve-now.com/resources/process-serving-laws/new-jersey#443
Even though proper service was not attempted, and only received an
email, am I obliged to respond to an email??????
