https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/357/513/
also
Speiser v. Randall, 357 U.S. 513 (1958)
From: Winningham Fearn<mailto:winfearn@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 11:10 PM
To:
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Administrating-Your-Public-Servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Administrating-Your-Public-Servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: do I lose any position by
not responding to an email from a superior court judge
•“The power to create presumptions is not a means of escape from constitutional
restrictions.” Bailey v Alabama, 219 U.S. 219, 238, et seq., 31 S.Ct. 145;
Manley v Georgia, 279 U.S. 1, 5-6, 49 S.Ct. 215
Best Regards,
Win
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:57 AM NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx<mailto:nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I do not believe he read the complaints in which we claim Sovereign status etc.
He may have assumed we were citizens of the United State property.
Get Outlook for
Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2FAAb9ysg&data=04%7C01%7C%7C15421a63e2be4938fc6408d8eb4da74b%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637518066036655180%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=n6hIJtJsPVhPD1iLWDDkV1Cvpa3uKukyj5qEG97uc2M%3D&reserved=0>
From: NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx<mailto:nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 11:39:22 AM
To:
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>;
Administrating-your-public-servants
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: do I lose any position
by not responding to an email from a superior court judge
Yes. Is a judicial complaint a criminal offense
Get Outlook for
Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2FAAb9ysg&data=04%7C01%7C%7C15421a63e2be4938fc6408d8eb4da74b%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637518066036665173%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=sbBVSWBPFYJ%2F12a5z0QniDt4qePHy%2BWlFtOKNqn6%2Fh4%3D&reserved=0>
From:
administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
on behalf of Me
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 11:11:06 AM
To:
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>;
Administrating-your-public-servants
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: do I lose any position by
not responding to an email from a superior court judge
I would use that as evidence for a Judicial complaint because he knows what
proper service is and he is using that to threaten you and intimidate you.
That is perjury of oath.
Best Regards, Glenn
On Friday, March 19, 2021, 07:10:06 AM CDT, NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx<mailto:nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
The "order" was sent by email.
I did not respond.
Maybe they can use the all caps name on the papers to get some credit.
We will keep updating.
Thanks
Get Outlook for
Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2FAAb9ysg&data=04%7C01%7C%7C15421a63e2be4938fc6408d8eb4da74b%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637518066036665173%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=sbBVSWBPFYJ%2F12a5z0QniDt4qePHy%2BWlFtOKNqn6%2Fh4%3D&reserved=0>
From:
administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
on behalf of Me
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 1:28:11 AM
To:
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: do I lose any position by
not responding to an email from a superior court judge
I would reject their offer of contract within 72 hours pursuant to Regulation
Z, Truth in Lending
Best Regards, Glenn
On Tuesday, March 16, 2021, 02:53:04 PM CDT, NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx<mailto:nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I am not responding at all.
The supposed ORDER was sent by email to me the morning AFTER my recent
presentation to CITY COUNCIL when I notified the Mayor with Evidence presented
that his City Solicitor and two other public servants were guilty of Official
Misconduct and that he should contact the State AG if he didn’t know what to
do.
My friend Miii, used to tell me that Courts fabricate papers and lie ALL the
time.
This email ORDER is a case in point.
They stamped a fake FILE date of Feb 5 and then claim a Zoom conference was
scheduled for March 9.
COMPLETE FRAUD……
Thanks to everyone
From: Jb<mailto:tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 2:52 PM
To:
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: do I lose any position by
not responding to an email from a superior court judge
To keep it legal they have to go through mail. As for email there might be
rules. But I’d stick to tried and true. Mail correspondence. don’t think email
stands as evidence too much in a court of law but they may be dependent on
circumstances. What’s the case on. I think I missed that in the chain. Are you
answering as fiction?
On Mar 16, 2021, at 2:23 PM, Mikee Siano (Redacted sender "mikee1987" for
DMARC) <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
They have to at least mail it to you I know from when I served my summons
there Is a rule that states a waiver is signed by the defense to wave service
process to stop the high fees that can be incurred in the process of service ..
you must get the waiver from the plaintiff in the mail
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 16, 2021, at 2:02 PM, NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx<mailto:nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
https://www.serve-now.com/resources/process-serving-laws/new-jersey#443<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.serve-now.com%2Fresources%2Fprocess-serving-laws%2Fnew-jersey%23443&data=04%7C01%7C%7C15421a63e2be4938fc6408d8eb4da74b%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637518066036675170%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=J9SHUHPkFsQWiM6C3Yuj78kPpB8cwBIi4BjvFy2A9U4%3D&reserved=0>
Even though proper service was not attempted, and only received an email, am I
obliged to respond to an email??????