NRC winner
It's not my screen shot but another's I was commenting on
On Nov 2, 2021, 3:26 PM -0600, David Hawley <d.hawley.777@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Here is only some of the main headings in the document...
*BILL OF COMPLAINT IN EQUITY
PRESENTMENT TO VOID PROCEEDINGS AND JURISDICTION
*JURISDICTION AND VENUE
*RULE OF LAW
*JURISDICTION OF COURTS OVER THE ESTATES OF INFANTS
*JURISDICTION OF COURTS OVER ESTATES OF INFANTS/MINORS-JUDICIAL ALLOWANCE FOR
SUPPORT, MAINTENANCE, AND EDUCATION
*ELEMENTS OF A TRUST:
*A PRIVATE SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP EXPRESS TRUST
Exhibit A
Verified Memorandum of Law and points of Authorities on TRUST
The creation of the trust
Cases consistent with sections stated herein:
Ok, so that's about page 15 is where I've so far read to. Per David's request
"please do not share this video outside your immediate family. If you know
anyone interested in purchasing their own video, please have them contact
sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx .we will make sure they can receive an official video
as well"
When you purchase the official video you also receive an awful lot of
information and documents, which you will need to change and adjust to make
them yours. Seems like I printed off half a reem of paper and am reading
everything first ,and so far am liking everything, comprehending is a work in
progress.
Hope this helps someone.
David Hawley
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021, 1:53 PM ejartz <ejartz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks David, any chance we could see with the 40 page document looks
like?
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021, 4:42 PM David Hawley <d.hawley.777@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
@ ejartz
You asked who knows....
I am actually half way through the 40 page document "Express
Trust",trying to wrap my head around... age of
majority/property/estate/securities of an infant/minor.
David-Lester;Straight is where I obtain this information.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021, 1:10 PM ejartz <ejartz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Okay, I've heard a lot of people talk about claiming your minor
estate or accounts. Who knows how to do this with certainty?
Otherwise it's just a concept that's as elusive as trying to
recover a drop of water that has fallen into the ocean.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021, 9:51 AM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
think you folks are missing the bigger over all goal other
than fixing ones status
Claim the Minor estate. Yes folks you are all including I
are Trust fund babies. And when I mean it , I mean it most of
you folks unless your young have 100's of millions if not
some have a billion + in their account.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:18 AM veritas ghost
<guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
i share charleys surprise here. infants are wards of the
court, theyre (municipal courts) are pushing
unconstitutional presumptions on people. this is my
opinion but i dont think they will take you seriously
after stating your an infant as you just admitted
jurisdiction instead of challenging it. with what you
stated it seems more productive to go the path of simply
plaintiff in error, but as charley does i advocate for
obliterating their feigned presumption of jurisdiction.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021, 8:39 PM Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Really?
Another "element" that proves you are applicable to
al cods, ordances, ules and statutes is that you
accepted or requested a "DRIVER LICENSE" and through
that nexus You are considered to be "Operating a
State Agency" and must follow all the same statutes
etc. which are for "RESIDENTS" DEF. "EMPLOYEES" or
"OFFICERS"
Article 1, section,8, clause 17 defines jurisdiction
of the United States an I'm not in it.
I can habe a driver's license and it means nothing.
Use it to rent a car. Marriage license means nothing.
Because United States does not have jurisdicton. Read
court cases and it is quite clear citizens is a fancy
word for employee oath taker.
On Nov 1, 2021, 7:12 PM -0600, Stephen Schwika
<dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
IS HOW THEY CONTROL THE MASSES - Possible Cestua
Que Vie Trust Acct. ACCESS
Brad,
I wish to TALK not TYPE too much. SEE TH BELOW
LINKS
Listen to THIS SHIT regarding "No INFANT can be
prosecuted" . Once the/their GUARDIANSHIP is
removed one then is FREE. It's [the infancy status
- that continues until "NONAGE" (correcttion of an
error, nonage is a proper legal term in FL, in
another state: possibly called emancipation) is
achived] a parent child corporation - a
self-powering municipal corporation .
The solution is RULE 19 . I am still listinng to
the first one. Kindly discuss this with me upon
listening to and understanding same.
The "PLEA OF INFANCY" stops all prosecution
efforts, istruction how to revert control back to
"you" since you , "did not intend to give ypyour
"rights" by accepting the mere "privledge"
involving The "INFANT" status that was "without
your knowledge or approval" through BAR
Association trickery and deception "legally" (but
not lawfully) labeled upon you by your mother
accepting and "signing" the (infant "delivery" -
into "commerce" making you (One part of you - not
the other "living" man or woman portion, a owned
corporation and "corporate" property undr a
concervancy or guadianship of your other
contractual (by mother signing at "delivery")
fictitious corporate daddy - the State ) with the
delivery receipt "receipt" enabling same called the
"birth certificate" where afterwards (if father
fails to claim the property before e years od -
TITLE goes up for "salvage" and is purchasd by The
Roman Catholic Church, Mormon Church, etc.) THEY
(through a contract with the U.S. gov. - their
"human trafficing" business associates) unless
properly corrected buy your or a parent's proper
and timely "administrative" NOTICE - and request
for a "NONAGE" Claim/petition for "correction" to
be achieved using RULE 19 _ OR "POSSIBLY" ANOTHER
unknown to me METHOD) otherwise THEY have total
control (plus "legal" jurisdiction) of you and ALL
your "spendthrift trust" assets, and you are left
as the bankrupt surety for ALL BILLS, EXPENCES,
LIABILITIS, MALACIOUS FO-PROFIT PROSECUTION
ATTEMPTS, ETC. ...when otherwise THEY should b
paying everything due (monthly, etc.) out of the
Cestue que vie trust account's (your) availabl
assets. Go figure...
Can listen to everything explained yourself - do
NOT let your ens legis HEAR this inportant
info.... it OWES you tens of millions of dollars
for you serving as the "receiver of srvice and
process" for IT since you were about 2 weeks old.
Must send the alleged Birth Certificate "owner" (of
the ens legis) a (notary Public "receiver" sent and
"timely" 21 day response received) Notice (by
affidavit) to respond, and then (after their
non-response based "failure-to-respond") a bill
for $50 per hour since back then for unpaid
"monthly" services and money due to you.
Another "element" that proves you are applicable to
al cods, ordances, ules and statutes is that you
accepted or requested a "DRIVER LICENSE" and
through that nexus You are considered to be
"Operating a State Agency" and must follow all the
same statutes etc. which are for "RESIDENTS" DEF.
"EMPLOYEES" or "OFFICERS" of the government...
Threfore, must dump the (if/when actually unneeded)
proof of State Agency operation Driver License,
unless you actually are a (tuck, bus,
ambulance,towtruck, limo, or other "commercial" and
"for-profit" employed as same "driver". Then
things get easier, otherwise simply claim
(non-prosecutable) "infant" status for everything,
stopping everything in its tracks. Listen to
brother boris explain everything...
Rumble — IAMSOMEDUDE.COM "Boris" DOCS:
http://www.lawofboris.com/files/10212021.zip
Borris TalkShoe is "Surfing with the Alien"
Hosted by: Law of Boris
Phone Number: (724) 444-7444 Thurs ?time
Call ID: 82668
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=82668&cmd=tc
*** lawofborris.COM [sign up videos, files,
private stash on Rumble-get link from LOB FOR
TELEGRAM chat AND rUMBLE
stephen
570-443-7892
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Some Dude <iamsomedude2@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Stephen Schwika <motiond@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2021, 01:15:35 PM EDT
Subject: Re: Assumed Name Certificate - strategic
amendment (text desired)
this is more like a "fee schedule" and I do not
think it will fit on a Minnesota dba filing. but i
could be mistaken;
i would just download a form and see for yourself
...
but, i think you should watch/listen to the 10-21
and 10-27 calls on the private stash
https://rumble.com/vo269p-zoom-meeting-10.21.2021.html
https://rumble.com/vod8fb-zoom-meeting-10.28.2021.html
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 4:09 AM Stephen Schwika
<motiond@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Minn. A.N.C. Name Holder : for STEPHEN JOHN
SCHWIKA
[[ I think the below is about ALL I AM ABLE TO
do ]]
:Stephen-John: Schwika. – ATTENTION: Notice
of Liability pursuant to $250k "unauthorized"
(private property) use fee for ”name use” of
Minnesota (Secretary of State) certified “ASSUMED
NAME” (SEE ABOVE). For (any evidenced written or
corporate) use of Name Holder’s “Private
non-corporate Business/Trad” name, any
derivative - variant names, copyrighted name(s),
the use of name holder, Assumed Name
Certificate’s registered “fictitious” business
entity or “other variant ” as any presumed
surety, the Name Estate for U.S. certificated
“PERSON” [Name Estate] decedent (birth
certificate) TITLE holder possessing valid
standing, Full Faith and Credit, plus highest
“security” interest in and FOR ALL PURPOSES OF
THE OBLIGATION OF THE “PERSON” [Name Estate]
wherein, above shall not be held liable in ANY
COURT in pursuance of and reliance on 12 USC 95a
Sect. 2, wherein same “PERSON” [Name Estate] is
entitled to ACQUITTANCE and DISCHARGE FOR ALL
PURPOSES OF THE OBLIGATION OF THE “PERSON” [Name
Estate]. Named “PERSON” [Name Estate] shall not
be held liable in ANY COURT for or in respect to
ANYTHING done or omitted in good faith in
connection with the administration of, or in
pursuance of and in reliance on, this section, or
any rule, regulation[code, ordinance or statute],
instruction, or direction issued hereunder… under
full and complete INDEMNITY via. General Orders
100 section 38. The RECEIPT [Birth
Certificate] and the [Estate?] name/title on same
is being used in pursuance of and reliance on 12
USC95a Sect. 2 for discharge of any U.S.
associated debt, plus discharge of liability, in
pursuance of and reliance upon same section
further evidenced by (recorded) Dual Secretary of
State (Federal and State) "authenticated" Birth
Certificate with other "verified" (sworn - true
and correct) document evidence supporting the
private property $250,000 "NAME USE" fee – due
within seven (7) days of verbal or other
notification of (each incidence of) unauthorized
name [Name Estate - TITLE] usage.
I am unsure if ALL THE ABOVE IS PERFECTLY
ACCURATE or appropriate to be used in (my)
pursuance of and reliance on 12 USC95a Sect. 2.
Possibly some changes, additional points, or
EDITING - may be required.
I would appreciate a little assistance hammering
this NOTICE out a little MORE in order to
optimize / and for accuratizing same... Dean do
you think this WILL ALL FIT IN THE MINN. ASSUME
NAM CERTIFICATE'S "NAME HOLDR" field (form)
space available...
Any helpful feedback on this TOPIC / objective
(HOPEFULLY - to be automatically "Printed-out" ON
the Minn. A.N.C. FORM) will be greatly
appreciated -
Please advise,
stephen
570/ 443-7892 ...kindly call me
