Veritas screenshot brings some good points out on usage of words.
Natural person but no such thing as artificial man. Artificial person is
possible. Especially in this day and age of robots.
Other supreme court cases use employee of goverment and that is more to my
liking and trying to make it a habit. Artificial person is none existent unless
one is referring to one who does as told with no spine or authority or mind of
their own. Welcome to 90% of Americans in the court room.
Quote to me the other day as inspiring. I'll be glad the day I walk the street
and hear people talking of morality, philosophy, and sustainability instead of
the latest Karishans (sp).
On Nov 2, 2021, 7:51 AM -0600, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
think you folks are missing the bigger over all goal other than fixing ones
status
Claim the Minor estate. Yes folks you are all including I are Trust fund
babies. And when I mean it , I mean it most of you folks unless your young
have 100's of millions if not some have a billion + in their account.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:18 AM veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
i share charleys surprise here. infants are wards of the court, theyre
(municipal courts) are pushing unconstitutional presumptions on people.
this is my opinion but i dont think they will take you seriously after
stating your an infant as you just admitted jurisdiction instead of
challenging it. with what you stated it seems more productive to go the
path of simply plaintiff in error, but as charley does i advocate for
obliterating their feigned presumption of jurisdiction.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021, 8:39 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Really?
Another "element" that proves you are applicable to al cods,
ordances, ules and statutes is that you accepted or requested a
"DRIVER LICENSE" and through that nexus You are considered to be
"Operating a State Agency" and must follow all the same statutes etc.
which are for "RESIDENTS" DEF. "EMPLOYEES" or "OFFICERS"
Article 1, section,8, clause 17 defines jurisdiction of the United
States an I'm not in it.
I can habe a driver's license and it means nothing. Use it to rent a
car. Marriage license means nothing. Because United States does not
have jurisdicton. Read court cases and it is quite clear citizens is
a fancy word for employee oath taker.
On Nov 1, 2021, 7:12 PM -0600, Stephen Schwika
<dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
IS HOW THEY CONTROL THE MASSES - Possible Cestua Que Vie Trust
Acct. ACCESS
Brad,
I wish to TALK not TYPE too much. SEE TH BELOW LINKS
Listen to THIS SHIT regarding "No INFANT can be prosecuted" .
Once the/their GUARDIANSHIP is removed one then is FREE. It's
[the infancy status - that continues until "NONAGE" (correcttion of
an error, nonage is a proper legal term in FL, in another state:
possibly called emancipation) is achived] a parent child
corporation - a self-powering municipal corporation .
The solution is RULE 19 . I am still listinng to the first one.
Kindly discuss this with me upon listening to and understanding
same.
The "PLEA OF INFANCY" stops all prosecution efforts, istruction
how to revert control back to "you" since you , "did not intend to
give ypyour "rights" by accepting the mere "privledge" involving
The "INFANT" status that was "without your knowledge or approval"
through BAR Association trickery and deception "legally" (but not
lawfully) labeled upon you by your mother accepting and "signing"
the (infant "delivery" - into "commerce" making you (One part of
you - not the other "living" man or woman portion, a owned
corporation and "corporate" property undr a concervancy or
guadianship of your other contractual (by mother signing at
"delivery") fictitious corporate daddy - the State ) with the
delivery receipt "receipt" enabling same called the "birth
certificate" where afterwards (if father fails to claim the
property before e years od - TITLE goes up for "salvage" and is
purchasd by The Roman Catholic Church, Mormon Church, etc.) THEY
(through a contract with the U.S. gov. - their "human trafficing"
business associates) unless properly corrected buy your or a
parent's proper and timely "administrative" NOTICE - and request
for a "NONAGE" Claim/petition for "correction" to be achieved
using RULE 19 _ OR "POSSIBLY" ANOTHER unknown to me METHOD)
otherwise THEY have total control (plus "legal" jurisdiction) of
you and ALL your "spendthrift trust" assets, and you are left as
the bankrupt surety for ALL BILLS, EXPENCES, LIABILITIS, MALACIOUS
FO-PROFIT PROSECUTION ATTEMPTS, ETC. ...when otherwise THEY should
b paying everything due (monthly, etc.) out of the Cestue que vie
trust account's (your) availabl assets. Go figure...
Can listen to everything explained yourself - do NOT let your ens
legis HEAR this inportant info.... it OWES you tens of millions
of dollars for you serving as the "receiver of srvice and process"
for IT since you were about 2 weeks old. Must send the alleged
Birth Certificate "owner" (of the ens legis) a (notary Public
"receiver" sent and "timely" 21 day response received) Notice (by
affidavit) to respond, and then (after their non-response based
"failure-to-respond") a bill for $50 per hour since back then for
unpaid "monthly" services and money due to you.
Another "element" that proves you are applicable to al cods,
ordances, ules and statutes is that you accepted or requested a
"DRIVER LICENSE" and through that nexus You are considered to be
"Operating a State Agency" and must follow all the same statutes
etc. which are for "RESIDENTS" DEF. "EMPLOYEES" or "OFFICERS" of
the government... Threfore, must dump the (if/when actually
unneeded) proof of State Agency operation Driver License, unless
you actually are a (tuck, bus, ambulance,towtruck, limo, or other
"commercial" and "for-profit" employed as same "driver". Then
things get easier, otherwise simply claim (non-prosecutable)
"infant" status for everything, stopping everything in its tracks.
Listen to brother boris explain everything...
Rumble — IAMSOMEDUDE.COM "Boris" DOCS:
http://www.lawofboris.com/files/10212021.zip
Borris TalkShoe is "Surfing with the Alien"
Hosted by: Law of Boris
Phone Number: (724) 444-7444 Thurs ?time
Call ID: 82668
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=82668&cmd=tc
*** lawofborris.COM [sign up videos, files, private stash on
Rumble-get link from LOB FOR TELEGRAM chat AND rUMBLE
stephen
570-443-7892
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Some Dude <iamsomedude2@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Stephen Schwika <motiond@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2021, 01:15:35 PM EDT
Subject: Re: Assumed Name Certificate - strategic amendment (text
desired)
this is more like a "fee schedule" and I do not think it will fit
on a Minnesota dba filing. but i could be mistaken;
i would just download a form and see for yourself ...
but, i think you should watch/listen to the 10-21 and 10-27 calls
on the private stash
https://rumble.com/vo269p-zoom-meeting-10.21.2021.html
https://rumble.com/vod8fb-zoom-meeting-10.28.2021.html
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 4:09 AM Stephen Schwika
<motiond@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Minn. A.N.C. Name Holder : for STEPHEN JOHN SCHWIKA
[[ I think the below is about ALL I AM ABLE TO do ]]
:Stephen-John: Schwika. – ATTENTION: Notice of Liability
pursuant to $250k "unauthorized" (private property) use fee for
”name use” of Minnesota (Secretary of State) certified “ASSUMED
NAME” (SEE ABOVE). For (any evidenced written or corporate) use
of Name Holder’s “Private non-corporate Business/Trad” name, any
derivative - variant names, copyrighted name(s), the use of name
holder, Assumed Name Certificate’s registered “fictitious”
business entity or “other variant ” as any presumed surety, the
Name Estate for U.S. certificated “PERSON” [Name Estate]
decedent (birth certificate) TITLE holder possessing valid
standing, Full Faith and Credit, plus highest “security” interest
in and FOR ALL PURPOSES OF THE OBLIGATION OF THE “PERSON” [Name
Estate] wherein, above shall not be held liable in ANY COURT in
pursuance of and reliance on 12 USC 95a Sect. 2, wherein same
“PERSON” [Name Estate] is entitled to ACQUITTANCE and DISCHARGE
FOR ALL PURPOSES OF THE OBLIGATION OF THE “PERSON” [Name Estate].
Named “PERSON” [Name Estate] shall not be held liable in ANY
COURT for or in respect to ANYTHING done or omitted in good
faith in connection with the administration of, or in pursuance
of and in reliance on, this section, or any rule,
regulation[code, ordinance or statute], instruction, or direction
issued hereunder… under full and complete INDEMNITY via. General
Orders 100 section 38. The RECEIPT [Birth Certificate] and the
[Estate?] name/title on same is being used in pursuance of and
reliance on 12 USC95a Sect. 2 for discharge of any U.S.
associated debt, plus discharge of liability, in pursuance of and
reliance upon same section further evidenced by (recorded) Dual
Secretary of State (Federal and State) "authenticated" Birth
Certificate with other "verified" (sworn - true and correct)
document evidence supporting the private property $250,000 "NAME
USE" fee – due within seven (7) days of verbal or other
notification of (each incidence of) unauthorized name [Name
Estate - TITLE] usage.
I am unsure if ALL THE ABOVE IS PERFECTLY ACCURATE or
appropriate to be used in (my) pursuance of and reliance on 12
USC95a Sect. 2. Possibly some changes, additional points, or
EDITING - may be required.
I would appreciate a little assistance hammering this NOTICE out
a little MORE in order to optimize / and for accuratizing
same... Dean do you think this WILL ALL FIT IN THE MINN. ASSUME
NAM CERTIFICATE'S "NAME HOLDR" field (form) space available...
Any helpful feedback on this TOPIC / objective (HOPEFULLY - to be
automatically "Printed-out" ON the Minn. A.N.C. FORM) will be
greatly appreciated -
Please advise,
stephen
570/ 443-7892 ...kindly call me
