Thanks Charley, I appreciate your getting back to me. If I hear anything
else from the IRS I will let you know. I think they are just fishing, but
we will have to wait and see. Thanks again and have a super day.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:56 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've changed it a bit
I'm a United States of America National
Article 1, section 8, clause 17
Article 6, clause 1
Not a United States citizen or subject
Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction
Trial by Jury required
It's 33 words now but more effective. In real tougher cases I use
portions of the northwest ordinance and experimenting MORE FILING WITH FBI,
SS, AND U.S. MARSHALS and getting pretty fair results of disobedient.
They often go silent with no reply and /or may send a second notice and
just send it again. Then it ends, but notice the second one has errors in
it.
Good luck
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:25 AM Aéius Cercle of
Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry if I was seemingly vague, but, each «State *of*» entity has itsLife in one word--LOVE
own rules/sets of rules, statutes, etc.; various RCW sections for State of
Washington, various SDCL sections for State of South Dakota, etc., etc.,
depending on state; sure, one can use/quote from federal-rules/regulations,
but, the «State» is supposed to have more authority/sovereignty over its
affairs than the Federal-Government.
A few things that are of course common or should be common to them all :
All public-officials must take an Oath of Office to support/defend the
Constitution (both State & Federal) against all enemies, foreign *and
domestic*. For any charges within any case to be valid there must be
«standing» on the part of the Plaintiff (i.e. : the proof that some
*actual* «injury/suffering/harm/damage» was done to person/property;
cases may be dismissed due to lack of standing). Cases must have a
«competent witness» who observed *actual* injury/harm/suffering/damage
to person/property (if/when a cop can be rendered incompetent, due to not
having the legal-knowledge to know what the term «standing» means in a
legalese/court-room context, then, said cop can simply be motioned into
dismissal/removal from the case/records due to lack of legal-competence,
upon which point, a motion for the case to be dismissed must be granted on
the grounds that the prosecuting PT has no legally competent witnesses).
I didn't go into *too much* «detail» about *all* the «various
options/avenues» than can be taken so as to not end up writing any books
via the e-mail medium (speaking of which I have actually recently received
a «*NOTICE OF DELINQUENT COURT FINES*» lettre from a law-firm out of the
State of Washington who are trying to get me to fund/pay into their scam
which will give me an opportunity to use your «Vacate-Notice/Lettre»
referring to Article 1, 17» [sorry I'll need to look the rest of it up as
it's not something I've memorised yet] in «field-testing» and perhaps
hopefully get some good results that we can add into the «evidence» for the
group that it is an effective method/remedy; if, for some reason they
fail/refuse to capitulate, I got a whole slew and bunches of other things
to write to the whole *entirety* of the State of Washington criminals
engaged in their massive racketeering enterprise in order to «chew them out
THOROUGHLY» for their scams/fraud/criminality/hypocrisies/etc.,
so-to-speak)...
On 22.03.2022 10:58, Charley Dan wrote:
Circle
What may those be, because without them it would appear to me your advice
is half there
due to various rules/reasons that I would point to, o
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:52 AM Aéius Cercle of
Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nope, none, nor do I have/offer any so-called legal-advise. That havingLife in one word--LOVE
been said...
When they remain silent within the court-room when I am speaking, from
what I have determined from mine own experiences, that is because the
«role» of the «judge» has been passed over to ME, and, they are simply
awaiting my declarations (keep in mind that, they must all operate
according to WRITTEN rule, and, I can DO the JOB that the fake «judge»
won't by simply declaring that said charges/case are/is invalid due to
various rules/reasons that I would point to, followed by making the
declaration that, for said reasons, the case will now be over and all
charges are now dropped; then basically pack up my stuff & walk out).
There are various ways to «handle» their hostile paper-actions against
you, but, easiest to just have a very good detailed written record/response
(and/or sets thereof), and, any time they try to get you to respond, tell
them to refer to the record (especially if it already covers all bases,
such as via Estoppels, pointing to their own violations of their own
so-called laws/rules, etc).
On 22.03.2022 09:09, Darren Miller Jr wrote:
Hey everyone,
Just left traffic court. I attempted to use my right to subrogation I made
a script for myself to read from and everyone in the hearing acted like
they didn’t know what I was speaking about. And the hearing was recorded.
Any suggestions?
Thank you
On Mar 22, 2022, at 9:00 AM, veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>
<guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--
--
