his given and family names are paul mitchelle. part of what you said seems
to be a misunderstanding of not only how this country functions, but that
theres 3 united states and the corporate municipal state is still and
always will be subserviant to the actual state of which we compose, and all
this point in time all places and people are free and equal [ie cali civil
code 51, preamble of the constitution]. me and paul are both from
massachusetts and im pretty sure hes on record been through the supreme
court more times than you also successfully, while utilizing the same info
as glenn [without them knowing eachother], just as paul and john [from
livefreenow.org]. im not sure what laughable notion caused you to think i
havent read organic documents even though i have directly quoted them alot,
not only have i done it so has paul, how much publicly verifably proof do
you need before you get i havent been pointing out pauls site, private
attorney general, realtor, and rico for my health?
maybe i should point out the other reason why i pointed out nelson to you
as well, you proclaimed your legal studies to be over when apparently there
not if hes not free.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022, 10:14 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Pail Andrew from. http://supremelaw.org/
posted by veritas ghost,?
"Because of the Tenth Amendment in the Bill of Rights, Congress is
prevented from creating a truly *national* corporation. The Tenth
Amendment reserves to each of the 50 States a right to charter their own
local, *domestic* corporations. These State corporations are, in turn,
*foreign* with respect to all federal corporations chartered by Congress,
without exception."
This also is known by Clearfield Doctrine 1943 that States, "private
foreign corporations can sue and be sued" in short these corporations
(states) are Privateering for the United States which can be sued do to our
contract or charter, The Constitution of the United State's. I would
include the agencies of the federal government also, like the IRS as
privateers. The state's hire County privateers, etc.
That is the reason for the United States federal court of Claims. It
states above and deceptively that the Privateering corporations can sue and
be sued, damn hard to do. Because the privateers refuse to negotiate. There
contract with the United States may forbid it. Privateering codes indicate
this may be true. My experience indicates the same.
Rather history of Privateering is that one can go to the nation the
privateers fly under or are contracted to, to settle damages. Especially
American's who have a charter/constitution issue to petition
Congress/United States for a Cure.
National corporation exists in corporation D.C. and so I disagree with the
author that there is no national corporation. The national corporation
headquarters (D.C.) hires privateers to do its bidding. Those privateers
are the state of? Which has It's privateers, County of. It's the way the
constituition was structured from the get-go. I've already expressed my
opinion where the free States are: northwest ordinance, section 14. Very
powerful to use.
I think our forefathers were very clever in the designing of government by
making them all pirates. After all they considered government in relation
to man as a "necessary evil". We the period are so ignorant and read court
cases instead of the organic law.
This is the foundational principles of my approach to resolve issues.
Simply They are stopped in a couple of weeks or one can go to FBI OR SECRET
SERVICE. If one can negotiate restitution from the privateers they may.
Most will not, the reason to go to D.C. to resolve. Taxes included.
I should make an exception for property taxes as it can be stopped or
negotiated at local level. Liens of federal agencies or local on property
are also stopped at local level. Quite easy to do.
For those who are going to bring up Nelson. I will not discuss the case as
Nelson understands and that is all that matters. I'll say he is doing fine
and delays of my approach was not the method but rather circumstances of
communications, Nelson's confinement etc. He thanks all you for your
prayers and concern.
Charleydan
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 6:42 AM veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
my thoughts on that, and im not trying to come off as any form ofLife in one word--LOVE
negative to any of you, is i look at it as our God given rights. or more
directly what the sons and daughters outlined what will not be trampled or
touched, they didnt specify every single right as we are the ultimate.
those saturn robe wearing pigs are our servants, and its outlined in
supreme court cases that even though the founding fathers drafted the
constitution and it was an act of legislature, it came directly from the
will of the people.
as far as tax goes i would visit these 2 sites [no offense to glen or the
republic of texas, their a good place to go to look at tax info too]
livefreenow.org
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022, 7:56 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My wacky view--
I would say the second amendment is supreme legislative law. That is
like taxation. The Constitution states all taxes to be direct or indirect.
Pollack v farmers loans and trust case under justice John Marshall
validated that taxes were unlawful legislatively. The next day Congress
passed an amendment and the case was nullified. The bill of rights
supremacy is claiming one with the articles of confederation agreement that
is the supreme law, common law, trial by jury law. Otherwise the second
amendment will be hacked to pieces over time by the United States
Privateering enities. Just my thoughts
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 6:12 AM veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
they dont, the 2nd amendment. they love slight of hand while forgettingLife in one word--LOVE
the supremacy clause. either its supreme or its not, not kinda sorta. as we
are the ultimate and thats our supreme will, they bow and have no choice,
except for coercion.
but again thats coercion. no negativety is meants to anyone from this
comment
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022, 6:32 AM Ray Greninger <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Of course the question is: to whom do these laws apply and where do
they apply?
On Thursday, March 17, 2022, 8:40:47 PM MDT, Don Mashak <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Progressive Globalist Republican RINOs: 57 voted for Gun Control.
https://usa.life/post/3663565_progressive-globalist-republican-rinos-57-voted-for-gun-control.html
[image: Inline image]
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Thursday, March 17, 2022, 03:36:47 PM CDT, Konstant Tution <
mistyharland75@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Glenn, is this really going to happen? I want to believe it. I’m not
stating this I’m genuinely asking will anything come of this? It’s almost
too good to be true. Do you think somebody will really be arrested?
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 03:21 Me <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Best Regards, Glenn
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From:
Date: Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:53 AM
Subject: FW: Covid arrest warrants
To:
*From:*
*Sent:* Monday, February 28, 2022 8:39 PM
*To:*
*Subject:* Covid arrest warrants
--
