I will make a brief attempt at trying to clear up a little bit of
«confusion» going on here...
One cannot «enter» into a corporate-construct (what many people seem
to think is a country but is not; it is a corporation) without a
contract. Furthermore, ALL «land» is _owned_ by *God*, not any mere
mortal man nor any man-made institution of man
(*cough*such-as*cough*governments*cough*).
Walt Disney (i.e.: the /man/) is NOT the same thing as WALT DISNEY (the
corporate-construct). ANY time you use the word «legal» or «illegal»
it is ALWAYS pertaining to the CORPORATE-construct (in /contrast/ to
saying «lawful» or «unlawful»). ANY claim of ownership of _land_ by
man or man-made institutions DOES NOT ABROGATE *«**GODS'»**true
ownership* over said land-mass (I suggest everyone ready the
*Border-Patrol Decree* from The Messiah's writings /before/ they end up
on the «wrong side» of God's law come the time when their spirit is
«scheduled» to depart from their earthly flesh)... that is all I am
going to respond with for now other than the following quote from yet
again The Messiah's writings /whether or not/ you believe that «the
second coming» is /yet/ to happen or not :
/~ The 'border' Decree ~/
/*Any*� person operating as a 'border' policing Agent who is empowered
by the 'State' of man to halt or restrict or prohibit the exit or entry
of any person for any reason onto or away from any national borders is
also� //'barred'� //from entering the State of Heaven, as is any person
demanding any 'fee' for the import or export of any goods by others,/
/*_The Decree_*:/
/"*To*� enter Heaven you must withdraw from being a 'user' of� _any_�
darkness in your daily deed. The 'control' exercised by Immigration &
Customs regulation is darkness in action/
/From this moment on all God's children are deemed by God to be citizens
of� _Earth_� and able to move anywhere and reside anywhere, and trade
anywhere, they so wish to without 'let or hindrance' from any other./
/Any whom for any reason continue to demand or 'ask' others to� _first_�
obtain a travel passport or 'permit' or 'visa' prior to embarkation or
disembarkation on airline or ship or passage through a road border will
'bar' themselves from entering� *Heaven*� and� _they_� become a 'citizen
slave' of� *Hell*� by their own hand./
-Quoted from
http://www.the-testament-of-truth.co.uk/truth/web/heaven.htm#page%205
On 2021-05-27 4:16 p.m., Charley Dan wrote:
Not true at all. Because if one entered internationally illegal. The constitution grants United States authority over it. Then again?
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 4:10 PM Garrett Mersman <c1rcaman48@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charlie you seemed confused... if you are born on the land of
America. You are automatically naturalized and are an American
National. Doesn’t matter your skin color�
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 2:50 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
For another perspective from what happened historically.
Lincoln went south that United States rules over the states
and they could not make their own law as a whole. And required
to pay those United starts servant taxes to the United States.
The Fourteenth amendment is about the constitution of the
United States now applies to the states of United States
because it. rules over the state.
It also made blacks citizens to the United States. I would
love the case with a black Individual being denied the
constitution. At this point the United States has not
challenged that yet. Obama. Talked. Of this in his departing
speech. "Some people in this country has more rights then
others. Trump. Has referred to it and said Congress needs to
take care of it. This is not an executive order fixer but
congressional Signature.�
The people coming here and borned here without naturalization
are in the same boat as blacks. If I was one, I would go get
naturalized because without it. Your children have the same
problem and can get extradited quickly. A man from Norway came
here and was to work on naturalization but did not. His
grandson a very good dairy farmer but got extradited this year
and he never lived in Norway. America is not perfect.�
On May 27, 2021, 13:44 -0600, NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>, wrote:
agree.� i found the fact the justice noted the BoR was not
binding on the states.
if one opens the commentary, the notation is made that 20th
century courts shy away from this interpretation, based on
14th amendment citizenship (paraphrase)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:*
administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Thursday, May 27, 2021 2:58 PM
*To:* administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Barron
vs. Baltimore 1833
�
Bill of rights is only a light to ones freedom. Unless they
are in a free citizens jurisdiction.�
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:44 PM Don Mashak
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello
Interesting... the Initial assessment that the Bill of
Rights does not apply actions of States...
Though it is incorrect...
I was about to have a hissy until I read deeper into the
text (where it says read more)
I found this there
*Case Commentary*
While the decision was reaffirmed by later 19th-century
Supreme Court cases, the 20th-century Court moved away
from Marshall's view. *It has found that the Due Process
Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applies most of the
Bill of Rights to the states under a doctrine known as
incorporation. Therefore, Barron, although not explicitly
overruled, probably cannot be considered valid law.*
------------------------------
But I would argue the ruling was wrong from the beginning...
The UNALIENABLE NATURAL RIGHTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL exits in
a state of Nature, before the government.
We only agree to give up our rights to act a Judge,
Executive and Legislator when we CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED.
Unalienable Rights do not come from government; depending
on your preference inalienable rights are either inherent
and innate in the individual and/or bestowed by God.
<JeffersonJudgesOligrachyClipArtSmall.jpg>
By definition, unalienable rights are not alienable. They
do not require explicit restatement in every government
document. To argue that the Bill of Rights (a partial
list of Natural rights as evinced by the 9th Amendment)
and damages caused by
alienation of alienation (Takings - 5th Amendment) only
apply to the Federal Government and NOT lower governments
is wholly in error. �
The unalienable Rights of an individual exist with or
without any government. The difference being in the
Pre-government
state it is the obligation of the individual to enforce
their Natural Rights, and after words, it is Government's
duty to protect the inalienable rights of all individuals
from the trespasses of others.
<NaturalLawVsProgressivismPurposeOfGovernment07292016.jpg>
Finally, I should have started with this.... Judges are
not God's... We don't have to take their word for anything.
Judges are just as nonvirtuous as the rest of us.. and
Progressive Globalist judges hate the Concept of Natural
Rights.
Each of us has the unalienable Natural Right to Establish
Truth for ourselves using our own observations and reasoning.
I previously demonstrated that Judges over 50 years
changed Jurisprudence from the "Pound Principle" where
all matter before the courts are to be settled on the
merits, not technicality; to a new jurisprudence where
deciding matters on a technicality are much more
accepted... as evince by SCOTUS refusing to hear Election
Fraud on Technicality.
With that precedent, why wouldn't they misinterpret the
application of Natural Rights as a means to advance the
Progressive Globalist Insurgency?
<ResolvingCasesOnTheMeritsRevisited03172021.jpg>
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Thursday, May 27, 2021, 11:25:05 AM CDT, NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/32/243/
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupreme.justia.com%2Fcases%2Ffederal%2Fus%2F32%2F243%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7C3001c1fb5c754a247d9808d9214188b5%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637577387635376637%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=dt%2FuxLH9RjHBleNXzZTRpXzood7KnAYppSzbVSS3USI%3D&reserved=0>
�
�
Sent from Mail
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F%3FLinkId%3D550986&data=04%7C01%7C%7C3001c1fb5c754a247d9808d9214188b5%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637577387635376637%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=DI0VsjNdUfSUc%2B8fsOMnA%2BR90r3WBgNOnHNdNvc2qZM%3D&reserved=0>
for Windows 10
�
--
Life in one word--LOVE
--
Life in one word--LOVE
