Charley, with all due respect, I only wish that you to not continue to
remain /uninformed/.
Whilst I will acknowledge that God does not make mistakes; whilst I will
acknowledge that God makes NO mistakes, God could even be described as a
mega-super-ultra-quantum-computer which would explain the /reason/ for
such /accuracy/, /omniscience/, /omnipotence/, etc., in «terms» that
are more «objective» to modern-day audiences (I don't buy that «old
man with a long beard sitting on a throne amongst the clouds in the
sky» reference/definition; it would be absolutely laughable to think
that some mere «mortal-form» constitutes the /fullness/ of the Eternal
Creator-of-All). Anyway...
Much as you worship and adore and «hold as gospel» the «history»
written in the book (i.e.: bible), listen, man, I used to /live/ in/with
a Russian-Orthodox Christian-Community, and «church» for us was a
DAILY activity (like, the /whole entire day/, and, I /assure/ you,
/they/ most-/certainly *know*/**the «bible» inside-out /much more/
than any average American), and, /frequently/ did we go over /much/ of
the bible-passages, how-ever, the «history» as we/you/I know it has
/changed/ in various forms of alterations to time-lines/time-pockets.
Therefore, I do not /automatically believe/ what I read in /any/
«history» book /regardless/ of whether it is a «secular» /or/
«religious» text-book, unless I was /personally/ there, and, even
/then/, I cannot necessarily trust that «history» won't be or wasn't
or will not be «altered» on the level of time-travel
machines/technologies. Examples of time-line/time-pocket alterations to
«history» /as it pertains to the bible/ are as follows...
*Exhibit 1 [Isaiah 11:6]* I /specifically remember/ when the
church-members made reference about the *Lion* shall lay down with the
lamb, how-ever, /regardless of which/ version of /any/ bible you grab,
NONE of them mention the word «lion» as it was /originally written/
(and no, this is NOT a translation-difference, and it is NOT a
version-difference, but a _literal_ /alteration/ to /history itself/ on
the level of someone using literal time-travel/time-machine technology).
It /now/ reads that the «Wolf shall dwell with the lamb» (good thing
that there are Christian-researchers who have done the work on this so
that I do not have to put together the compelling presentations for
myself <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HujIJ70dA3I&fmt=18>).
*Exhibit 2 :* One does not put win into old /wine-skins/ lest the
wine-skin breaks, but, instead, are put into new wine-skins/;
//this///passage, apparently, now reads as «bottles» /instead of/
«wine-skins» (also another bible-reference that I remember when I
lived with that Russian-community).
*Exhibit 3 :* The famously known Lord's Prayer about «forgive us our
trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us» /was/ its
_origina__l_ writing; currently, it is written as «forgive us our
*debts* as we forgive our *debtors*» (yes, even in the KJV, believe it
or not).
*Exhibit 4 :* The word «matrix» now shows up in the bible; its
/original/ wording was «womb» but, now, for some reason, it is
«matrix» and it /also/ now makes NO difference as to /which/
«version» of /any/ «bible» that you can pull up for reference
(...probably /!/).
*Non-Bible Exhibit :* Tienanmen-Square incident known as the
«Tank-Man» who /got ran over/ during the /original/
time-line/time-pocket, sparking a HUGE world-wide protest/controversy,
something that should be more well-known amongst the «memories» of the
more «elder» group-members. Now ? Same «Tank-Man» apparently /never
got ran over/ during the /current/ time-line/time-pocket.
I /could/ provide /many more/ examples, but, I would rather that any of
you who come across my posts /read/ the _entire context_ for yourself
/before/ you «judge a book by its cover» so to metaphorically speak;
for a /more/ «scientifically» obtained «map of reality» (and, thus,
/much more comprehensive/ than what is even written within The Testament
of Truth by The Messiah himself) I would recommend obtaining a copy of
«The Cross-Correspondences» archives (held at the SPR
<https://www.spr.ac.uk/>). The total amount of reading spans 12,000
pages and was assembled by several of the absolutely greatest scientific
(and /honest/) minds who had /ever/ walked upon the face of this/the
earth (but it has also been my experience that «fundamentalists» seem
to /insist/ on /remaining/ in an «echo-chambre» so I do not
necessarily expect anybody who holds onto any kind of «rigid
mental-construct» to go out of their way to necessarily /inform
themselves/ even if I wish to be hopeful that they would at least /try/).
Anyway, I was earlier intending to quote this particular reference, but,
the Border Decree is also still relevant...:
«
No visitor to any place on earth is an 'illegal' person for having
arrived unannounced or non-permitted as they seek refuge or for any
other reason, for no persons or institutions of man owns any country or
nation, for no 'army of men' or Constitutional papers or 'flag' raised
up as a banner of such abrogates� _God's_� ownership of every atom of
planet earth.
Let it be now clearly understood that� *God*� is the absolute owner and
Ruler of earth, not men using force of arms.
»
-Quoted from http://www.the-testament-of-truth.co.uk/truth/web/sovereign.htm
On 2021-05-27 6:20 p.m., Charley Dan wrote:
WOW! Jews we know where they are going because they were not to mix with foreigners. Utterly destroy foreigners or I'll judge. It's amazing the interpretations one can get without using Genesis to Revelations. Plus they had land ownership that eliminated foreigners every fifty years. The land was granted to tribes and individuals. If one lost their land for unwise decisions or bad luck. Fifty years it was returned to the original Jews ancestry. Showing ownership is valid. David who defended the borders of Israel then became King. He fought Goliath to protect the border. Personally I'm tired of colleges preaching social justice as it is not scriptural. Love from my heart and compassion are taught. It also defies the law of equality that God laid down.�
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 5:09 PM Aéius Cercle of Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I will make a brief attempt at trying to clear up a little bit of
«confusion» going on here...
One cannot «enter» into a corporate-construct (what many people
seem to think is a country but is not; it is a corporation)
without a contract. Furthermore, ALL «land» is _owned_ by *God*,
not any mere mortal man nor any man-made institution of man
(*cough*such-as*cough*governments*cough*).
Walt Disney (i.e.: the /man/) is NOT the same thing as WALT DISNEY
(the corporate-construct). ANY time you use the word «legal» or
«illegal» it is ALWAYS pertaining to the CORPORATE-construct (in
/contrast/ to saying «lawful» or «unlawful»). ANY claim of
ownership of _land_ by man or man-made institutions DOES NOT
ABROGATE *«**GODS'»**true ownership* over said land-mass (I
suggest everyone ready the *Border-Patrol Decree* from The
Messiah's writings /before/ they end up on the «wrong side» of
God's law come the time when their spirit is «scheduled» to
depart from their earthly flesh)... that is all I am going to
respond with for now other than the following quote from yet again
The Messiah's writings /whether or not/ you believe that «the
second coming» is /yet/ to happen or not :
/~ The 'border' Decree ~/
/*Any*� person operating as a 'border' policing Agent who is
empowered by the 'State' of man to halt or restrict or prohibit
the exit or entry of any person for any reason onto or away from
any national borders is also� //'barred'� //from entering the
State of Heaven, as is any person demanding any 'fee' for the
import or export of any goods by others,/
/*_The Decree_*:/
/"*To*� enter Heaven you must withdraw from being a 'user' of�
_any_� darkness in your daily deed. The 'control' exercised by
Immigration & Customs regulation is darkness in action/
/From this moment on all God's children are deemed by God to be
citizens of� _Earth_� and able to move anywhere and reside
anywhere, and trade anywhere, they so wish to without 'let or
hindrance' from any other./
/Any whom for any reason continue to demand or 'ask' others to�
_first_� obtain a travel passport or 'permit' or 'visa' prior to
embarkation or disembarkation on airline or ship or passage
through a road border will 'bar' themselves from entering�
*Heaven*� and� _they_� become a 'citizen slave' of� *Hell*� by
their own hand./
-Quoted from
http://www.the-testament-of-truth.co.uk/truth/web/heaven.htm#page%205
On 2021-05-27 4:16 p.m., Charley Dan wrote:
Not true at all. Because if one entered internationally illegal.
The constitution grants United States authority over it. Then again?
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 4:10 PM Garrett Mersman
<c1rcaman48@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charlie you seemed confused... if you are born on the land of
America. You are automatically naturalized and are an
American National. Doesn’t matter your skin color�
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 2:50 PM Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
For another perspective from what happened historically.
Lincoln went south that United States rules over the
states and they could not make their own law as a whole.
And required to pay those United starts servant taxes to
the United States. The Fourteenth amendment is about the
constitution of the United States now applies to the
states of United States because it. rules over the state.
It also made blacks citizens to the United States. I
would love the case with a black Individual being denied
the constitution. At this point the United States has not
challenged that yet. Obama. Talked. Of this in his
departing speech. "Some people in this country has more
rights then others. Trump. Has referred to it and said
Congress needs to take care of it. This is not an
executive order fixer but congressional Signature.�
The people coming here and borned here without
naturalization are in the same boat as blacks. If I was
one, I would go get naturalized because without it. Your
children have the same problem and can get extradited
quickly. A man from Norway came here and was to work on
naturalization but did not. His grandson a very good
dairy farmer but got extradited this year and he never
lived in Norway. America is not perfect.�
On May 27, 2021, 13:44 -0600, NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>, wrote:
agree.� i found the fact the justice noted the BoR was
not binding on the states.
if one opens the commentary, the notation is made that
20th century courts shy away from this interpretation,
based on 14th amendment citizenship (paraphrase)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:*
administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Thursday, May 27, 2021 2:58 PM
*To:* administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* [administrating-your-public-servants] Re:
Barron vs. Baltimore 1833
�
Bill of rights is only a light to ones freedom. Unless
they are in a free citizens jurisdiction.�
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:44 PM Don Mashak
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello
Interesting... the Initial assessment that the Bill
of Rights does not apply actions of States...
Though it is incorrect...
I was about to have a hissy until I read deeper into
the text (where it says read more)
I found this there
*Case Commentary*
While the decision was reaffirmed by later
19th-century Supreme Court cases, the 20th-century
Court moved away from Marshall's view. *It has found
that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment applies most of the Bill of Rights to the
states under a doctrine known as incorporation.
Therefore, Barron, although not explicitly
overruled, probably cannot be considered valid law.*
------------------------------
But I would argue the ruling was wrong from the
beginning...
The UNALIENABLE NATURAL RIGHTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL
exits in a state of Nature, before the government.
We only agree to give up our rights to act a Judge,
Executive and Legislator when we CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED.
Unalienable Rights do not come from government;
depending on your preference inalienable rights are
either inherent and innate in the individual and/or
bestowed by God.
<JeffersonJudgesOligrachyClipArtSmall.jpg>
By definition, unalienable rights are not alienable.
They do not require explicit restatement in every
government document. To argue that the Bill of
Rights (a partial list of Natural rights as evinced
by the 9th Amendment) and damages caused by
alienation of alienation (Takings - 5th Amendment)
only apply to the Federal Government and NOT lower
governments is wholly in error. �
The unalienable Rights of an individual exist with
or without any government. The difference being in
the Pre-government
state it is the obligation of the individual to
enforce their Natural Rights, and after words, it is
Government's duty to protect the inalienable rights
of all individuals from the trespasses of others.
<NaturalLawVsProgressivismPurposeOfGovernment07292016.jpg>
Finally, I should have started with this.... Judges
are not God's... We don't have to take their word
for anything.
Judges are just as nonvirtuous as the rest of us..
and Progressive Globalist judges hate the Concept of
Natural Rights.
Each of us has the unalienable Natural Right to
Establish Truth for ourselves using our own
observations and reasoning.
I previously demonstrated that Judges over 50 years
changed Jurisprudence from the "Pound Principle"
where all matter before the courts are to be settled
on the merits, not technicality; to a new
jurisprudence where deciding matters on a
technicality are much more accepted... as evince by
SCOTUS refusing to hear Election Fraud on Technicality.
With that precedent, why wouldn't they misinterpret
the application of Natural Rights as a means to
advance the
Progressive Globalist Insurgency?
<ResolvingCasesOnTheMeritsRevisited03172021.jpg>
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Thursday, May 27, 2021, 11:25:05 AM CDT, NELSON
DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/32/243/
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupreme.justia.com%2Fcases%2Ffederal%2Fus%2F32%2F243%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7C3001c1fb5c754a247d9808d9214188b5%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637577387635376637%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=dt%2FuxLH9RjHBleNXzZTRpXzood7KnAYppSzbVSS3USI%3D&reserved=0>
�
�
Sent from Mail
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F%3FLinkId%3D550986&data=04%7C01%7C%7C3001c1fb5c754a247d9808d9214188b5%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637577387635376637%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=DI0VsjNdUfSUc%2B8fsOMnA%2BR90r3WBgNOnHNdNvc2qZM%3D&reserved=0>
for Windows 10
�
--
Life in one word--LOVE
-- Life in one word--LOVE
--
Life in one word--LOVE
