Alas, /few /(if any) on earth can claim to be «sin-free», and, thus,
that they are /not prone/ to the «errors» otherwise typically made by
«sinners» and, alas, I have /yet/ to see the «Mandela-Effect issues»
addressed as it pertains to particularly the passage about the *Lion
shall lay down with the lamb* (once somebody has a screen-shot of a
photo of that page/passage where it reads *lion* and _not_ «wolf»
/then/ I will have to re-consider my apprehensions, but, until then,
/nobody/ has even /tried/ to address it thus far). Not sure what I am
referring to or why ? Listen to and read the words in the following video...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/SIxNWntbtU4m/
I believe this has also been the case for various/certain segments of
so-called «Law» (including its history). As some of you know, just
like prosecutors prosecute based in text-information presented before
them (regardless of whether it si accurate/truthful or not), legislators
legislate based on historic text-references that are available to them
(regardless of whether it is truthful/accurate or not). This is
something that can and does have serious implications and shouldn't be
over-looked but I will hold off on getting into too much detail until
for another day when I might have enough spare-time to be able to obtain
some compelling evidence for Mandela-Effects as it pertains to Law.
On 2021-05-28 8:43 a.m., J_B wrote:
Ailus Cercle.. The KJV 1611 doesnt have any contradictions. The so called ones would be human error *not the humans that were guided by Guy to write the bible
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:09 AM Aéius Cercle of Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So you didn't actually /grow up/ with the bible ? Fine, but,
plenty of people /did/. Why are you responding in /such a manner/
as-if though «uninformed» is some sort of pejorative (though it
is not). Why not /accept/ and /welcome/ the more «peer-review»
process where we /examine/ even the «diametrically opposed to our
own paradigm(s)/world-view(s)» in order to /further-refine/ our
knowledge-and-understanding/comprehension ? (I will address the
word «uninformed» in a bit more detail further down in this message)
I am only pointing certain things out for your own sake//benefit/,
and, it's not like you /haven't/ made certain «uninformed»
posts/comments, such as the number of supreme-courts, the
existence of only _one_ «constitution», etc (the people who've
/done/ their «law-homework» will /know/ what I referring to in
these examples). I do not intend it as criticism against you, but,
more like a friendly «hey, I think you may have missed something
important over here/there» message, why not /at least/ /consider/
that this _may_ be /more accurate/comprehensive/ than the
«paradigm» in which you have presented/projected ? I have
already presented my «references» that /back up/ with /much
evidence/ for various things with which I have posted (but, for
/many/ cases, nearly all of my references /are/ a lot to digest,
/more so/ than the /short/ amount of «time» in which you
«respond/reply» which /does demonstrate/ that you /did not even
look into/ the «information» that I referenced /before/
/ironically/ «judging» it as-if though you «/already know/»
the _right_ answer /contrary/ to your references that you have
«found so much more to know» [and there is indeed a _lot_ to
know...])
Regarding «/your/ Bible» I am only going to ask you to do ONE
thing IF you /wish/ to «demonstrate» to me that there are NO
issues with it : /Find /me the «passage» within «/your/ Bible»
(/supposed/ to be Isaiah 11:6) where it reads the _original_
writing of *Lion* (rather than «Wolf») and take a photo of that
page and upload the image as an attachment /then/ it will at least
serve as «significant-evidence» that IT had /not/ been
/altered/. People who /grew up/ with Bible-teachings (like the man
in the following link) remember the /original-wording/ which was
/not/ «Wolf» but *Lion...*
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HujIJ70dA3I&fmt=18
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HujIJ70dA3I&fmt=18>
And, from one of my earlier posts, I also linked/reference
nonstampcollector's videos which /quotes directly from the bible
itself/ various /obvious/ and /glaring/ «contradictions»
.../intentionally ignoring/ the «evidence» like «it doesn't
exist» is simply being intellectually dishonest and is simply not
good for your spirit/soul/God-standing/etc., and is /why/ I use
words like «uninformed» in /response/ to /that/ kind of
disposition/reaction. Said «contradictions» video is as follows...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB3g6mXLEKk&fmt=18
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB3g6mXLEKk&fmt=18>
That mentioned, certainly, much «truth/wisdom» _can_ be found
within the bible, but, also, /very/ seemingly «satanic» writings
can _also_ be found within said so-called «Holy Book», too.,
just as with every other /supposèd/ «holy» text-book (Qu'ran or
otherwise). This is _not_ «conjecture» but is literally pointed
out in books like «Jehovah Unmasked» by Nathaniel Merritt
(although this publication points out «issues» with the
«bible» and is not about the Qu'ran which /also/ has /similar/
«issues» [regardless of whether you wish to admit/acknowledge
that they are «issues» or not]). I have an Aunt-in-Law who is a
Fundamentalist Southern-Baptist, but, she was at least /honest/
/enough/ to admit her mis-givings about the direction the [typical
American ?] «church» has gone (i.e.:
*cough*modern-day*cough*Pharisees*cough*), even though, in her own
words, she literally said to me that day that she «hates to admit
it, but...» (and the rest is part of a _long_ history to how
things have ended up to the present-day with why I write about
these things the way I do now).
On 2021-05-27 8:57 p.m., Charley Dan wrote:
Uniformed? Who made you judge? I've learnt from three years of
Bible college and Dallas theological Seminary home courses. I'm
less Learnt then the day I started as I found so much more to
know. I totally disagree with most of what you said because my
Bible never had issues you mentioned. Second is more about my
relationship with Jesus and how I treat others then about my head.�
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 8:24 PM Aéius Cercle of
Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charley, with all due respect, I only wish that you to not
continue to remain /uninformed/.
Whilst I will acknowledge that God does not make mistakes;
whilst I will acknowledge that God makes NO mistakes, God
could even be described as a
mega-super-ultra-quantum-computer which would explain the
/reason/ for such /accuracy/, /omniscience/, /omnipotence/,
etc., in «terms» that are more «objective» to modern-day
audiences (I don't buy that «old man with a long beard
sitting on a throne amongst the clouds in the sky»
reference/definition; it would be absolutely laughable to
think that some mere «mortal-form» constitutes the
/fullness/ of the Eternal Creator-of-All). Anyway...
Much as you worship and adore and «hold as gospel» the
«history» written in the book (i.e.: bible), listen, man, I
used to /live/ in/with a Russian-Orthodox
Christian-Community, and «church» for us was a DAILY
activity (like, the /whole entire day/, and, I /assure/ you,
/they/ most-/certainly *know*/**the «bible» inside-out
/much more/ than any average American), and, /frequently/ did
we go over /much/ of the bible-passages, how-ever, the
«history» as we/you/I know it has /changed/ in various
forms of alterations to time-lines/time-pockets. Therefore, I
do not /automatically believe/ what I read in /any/
«history» book /regardless/ of whether it is a «secular»
/or/ «religious» text-book, unless I was /personally/
there, and, even /then/, I cannot necessarily trust that
«history» won't be or wasn't or will not be «altered» on
the level of time-travel machines/technologies. Examples of
time-line/time-pocket alterations to «history» /as it
pertains to the bible/ are as follows...
*Exhibit 1 [Isaiah 11:6]* I /specifically remember/ when the
church-members made reference about the *Lion* shall lay down
with the lamb, how-ever, /regardless of which/ version of
/any/ bible you grab, NONE of them mention the word «lion»
as it was /originally written/ (and no, this is NOT a
translation-difference, and it is NOT a version-difference,
but a _literal_ /alteration/ to /history itself/ on the level
of someone using literal time-travel/time-machine
technology). It /now/ reads that the «Wolf shall dwell with
the lamb» (good thing that there are Christian-researchers
who have done the work on this so that I do not have to put
together the compelling presentations for myself
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HujIJ70dA3I&fmt=18>).
*Exhibit 2 :* One does not put win into old /wine-skins/ lest
the wine-skin breaks, but, instead, are put into new
wine-skins/; //this///passage, apparently, now reads as
«bottles» /instead of/ «wine-skins» (also another
bible-reference that I remember when I lived with that
Russian-community).
*Exhibit 3 :* The famously known Lord's Prayer about
«forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass
against us» /was/ its _origina__l_ writing; currently, it is
written as «forgive us our *debts* as we forgive our
*debtors*» (yes, even in the KJV, believe it or not).
*Exhibit 4 :* The word «matrix» now shows up in the bible;
its /original/ wording was «womb» but, now, for some
reason, it is «matrix» and it /also/ now makes NO
difference as to /which/ «version» of /any/ «bible» that
you can pull up for reference (...probably /!/).
*Non-Bible Exhibit :* Tienanmen-Square incident known as the
«Tank-Man» who /got ran over/ during the /original/
time-line/time-pocket, sparking a HUGE world-wide
protest/controversy, something that should be more well-known
amongst the «memories» of the more «elder» group-members.
Now ? Same «Tank-Man» apparently /never got ran over/
during the /current/ time-line/time-pocket.
I /could/ provide /many more/ examples, but, I would rather
that any of you who come across my posts /read/ the _entire
context_ for yourself /before/ you «judge a book by its
cover» so to metaphorically speak; for a /more/
«scientifically» obtained «map of reality» (and, thus,
/much more comprehensive/ than what is even written within
The Testament of Truth by The Messiah himself) I would
recommend obtaining a copy of «The Cross-Correspondences»
archives (held at the SPR <https://www.spr.ac.uk/>). The
total amount of reading spans 12,000 pages and was assembled
by several of the absolutely greatest scientific (and
/honest/) minds who had /ever/ walked upon the face of
this/the earth (but it has also been my experience that
«fundamentalists» seem to /insist/ on /remaining/ in an
«echo-chambre» so I do not necessarily expect anybody who
holds onto any kind of «rigid mental-construct» to go out
of their way to necessarily /inform themselves/ even if I
wish to be hopeful that they would at least /try/).
Anyway, I was earlier intending to quote this particular
reference, but, the Border Decree is also still relevant...:
«
No visitor to any place on earth is an 'illegal' person for
having arrived unannounced or non-permitted as they seek
refuge or for any other reason, for no persons or
institutions of man owns any country or nation, for no 'army
of men' or Constitutional papers or 'flag' raised up as a
banner of such abrogates� _God's_� ownership of every atom of
planet earth.
Let it be now clearly understood that� *God*� is the absolute
owner and Ruler of earth, not men using force of arms.
»
-Quoted from
http://www.the-testament-of-truth.co.uk/truth/web/sovereign.htm
On 2021-05-27 6:20 p.m., Charley Dan wrote:
WOW! Jews we know where they are going because they were not
to mix with foreigners. Utterly destroy foreigners or I'll
judge. It's amazing the interpretations one can get without
using Genesis to Revelations. Plus they had land ownership
that eliminated foreigners every fifty years. The land was
granted to tribes and individuals. If one lost their land
for unwise decisions or bad luck. Fifty years it was
returned to the original Jews ancestry. Showing ownership is
valid. David who defended the borders of Israel then became
King. He fought Goliath to protect the border. Personally
I'm tired of colleges preaching social justice as it is not
scriptural. Love from my heart and compassion are taught. It
also defies the law of equality that God laid down.�
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 5:09 PM Aéius Cercle of
Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I will make a brief attempt at trying to clear up a
little bit of «confusion» going on here...
One cannot «enter» into a corporate-construct (what
many people seem to think is a country but is not; it is
a corporation) without a contract. Furthermore, ALL
«land» is _owned_ by *God*, not any mere mortal man
nor any man-made institution of man
(*cough*such-as*cough*governments*cough*).
Walt Disney (i.e.: the /man/) is NOT the same thing as
WALT DISNEY (the corporate-construct). ANY time you use
the word «legal» or «illegal» it is ALWAYS
pertaining to the CORPORATE-construct (in /contrast/ to
saying «lawful» or «unlawful»). ANY claim of
ownership of _land_ by man or man-made institutions DOES
NOT ABROGATE *«**GODS'»**true ownership* over said
land-mass (I suggest everyone ready the *Border-Patrol
Decree* from The Messiah's writings /before/ they end up
on the «wrong side» of God's law come the time when
their spirit is «scheduled» to depart from their
earthly flesh)... that is all I am going to respond with
for now other than the following quote from yet again
The Messiah's writings /whether or not/ you believe that
«the second coming» is /yet/ to happen or not :
/~ The 'border' Decree ~/
/*Any*� person operating as a 'border' policing Agent
who is empowered by the 'State' of man to halt or
restrict or prohibit the exit or entry of any person for
any reason onto or away from any national borders is
also� //'barred'� //from entering the State of Heaven,
as is any person demanding any 'fee' for the import or
export of any goods by others,/
/*_The Decree_*:/
/"*To*� enter Heaven you must withdraw from being a
'user' of� _any_� darkness in your daily deed. The
'control' exercised by Immigration & Customs regulation
is darkness in action/
/From this moment on all God's children are deemed by
God to be citizens of� _Earth_� and able to move
anywhere and reside anywhere, and trade anywhere, they
so wish to without 'let or hindrance' from any other./
/Any whom for any reason continue to demand or 'ask'
others to� _first_� obtain a travel passport or 'permit'
or 'visa' prior to embarkation or disembarkation on
airline or ship or passage through a road border will
'bar' themselves from entering� *Heaven*� and� _they_�
become a 'citizen slave' of� *Hell*� by their own hand./
-Quoted from
http://www.the-testament-of-truth.co.uk/truth/web/heaven.htm#page%205
On 2021-05-27 4:16 p.m., Charley Dan wrote:
Not true at all. Because if one entered internationally
illegal. The constitution grants United States
authority over it. Then again?
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 4:10 PM Garrett Mersman
<c1rcaman48@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charlie you seemed confused... if you are born on
the land of America. You are automatically
naturalized and are an American National. Doesn’t
matter your skin color�
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 2:50 PM Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
For another perspective from what happened
historically. Lincoln went south that United
States rules over the states and they could not
make their own law as a whole. And required to
pay those United starts servant taxes to the
United States. The Fourteenth amendment is
about the constitution of the United States now
applies to the states of United States because
it. rules over the state.
It also made blacks citizens to the United
States. I would love the case with a black
Individual being denied the constitution. At
this point the United States has not challenged
that yet. Obama. Talked. Of this in his
departing speech. "Some people in this country
has more rights then others. Trump. Has
referred to it and said Congress needs to take
care of it. This is not an executive order
fixer but congressional Signature.�
The people coming here and borned here without
naturalization are in the same boat as blacks.
If I was one, I would go get naturalized
because without it. Your children have the same
problem and can get extradited quickly. A man
from Norway came here and was to work on
naturalization but did not. His grandson a very
good dairy farmer but got extradited this year
and he never lived in Norway. America is not
perfect.�
On May 27, 2021, 13:44 -0600, NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>, wrote:
agree.� i found the fact the justice noted the
BoR was not binding on the states.
if one opens the commentary, the notation is
made that 20th century courts shy away from
this interpretation, based on 14th amendment
citizenship (paraphrase)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:*
administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Thursday, May 27, 2021 2:58 PM
*To:*
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:*
[administrating-your-public-servants] Re:
Barron vs. Baltimore 1833
�
Bill of rights is only a light to ones
freedom. Unless they are in a free citizens
jurisdiction.�
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:44 PM Don Mashak
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello
Interesting... the Initial assessment that
the Bill of Rights does not apply actions
of States...
Though it is incorrect...
I was about to have a hissy until I read
deeper into the text (where it says read more)
I found this there
*Case Commentary*
While the decision was reaffirmed by later
19th-century Supreme Court cases, the
20th-century Court moved away from
Marshall's view. *It has found that the
Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment applies most of the Bill of
Rights to the states under a doctrine
known as incorporation. Therefore, Barron,
although not explicitly overruled,
probably cannot be considered valid law.*
------------------------------
But I would argue the ruling was wrong
from the beginning...
The UNALIENABLE NATURAL RIGHTS OF THE
INDIVIDUAL exits in a state of Nature,
before the government.
We only agree to give up our rights to act
a Judge, Executive and Legislator when we
CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED.
Unalienable Rights do not come from
government; depending on your preference
inalienable rights are either inherent and
innate in the individual and/or bestowed
by God.
<JeffersonJudgesOligrachyClipArtSmall.jpg>
By definition, unalienable rights are not
alienable. They do not require explicit
restatement in every government document.
To argue that the Bill of Rights (a
partial list of Natural rights as evinced
by the 9th Amendment) and damages caused by
alienation of alienation (Takings - 5th
Amendment) only apply to the Federal
Government and NOT lower governments is
wholly in error. �
The unalienable Rights of an individual
exist with or without any government. The
difference being in the Pre-government
state it is the obligation of the
individual to enforce their Natural
Rights, and after words, it is
Government's duty to protect the
inalienable rights of all individuals from
the trespasses of others.
<NaturalLawVsProgressivismPurposeOfGovernment07292016.jpg>
Finally, I should have started with
this.... Judges are not God's... We don't
have to take their word for anything.
Judges are just as nonvirtuous as the rest
of us.. and Progressive Globalist judges
hate the Concept of Natural Rights.
Each of us has the unalienable Natural
Right to Establish Truth for ourselves
using our own observations and reasoning.
I previously demonstrated that Judges over
50 years changed Jurisprudence from the
"Pound Principle" where all matter before
the courts are to be settled on the
merits, not technicality; to a new
jurisprudence where deciding matters on a
technicality are much more accepted... as
evince by SCOTUS refusing to hear Election
Fraud on Technicality.
With that precedent, why wouldn't they
misinterpret the application of Natural
Rights as a means to advance the
Progressive Globalist Insurgency?
<ResolvingCasesOnTheMeritsRevisited03172021.jpg>
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Thursday, May 27, 2021, 11:25:05 AM
CDT, NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/32/243/
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupreme.justia.com%2Fcases%2Ffederal%2Fus%2F32%2F243%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7C3001c1fb5c754a247d9808d9214188b5%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637577387635376637%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=dt%2FuxLH9RjHBleNXzZTRpXzood7KnAYppSzbVSS3USI%3D&reserved=0>
�
�
Sent from Mail
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F%3FLinkId%3D550986&data=04%7C01%7C%7C3001c1fb5c754a247d9808d9214188b5%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637577387635376637%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=DI0VsjNdUfSUc%2B8fsOMnA%2BR90r3WBgNOnHNdNvc2qZM%3D&reserved=0>
for Windows 10
�
--
Life in one word--LOVE
-- Life in one word--LOVE
-- Life in one word--LOVE
-- Life in one word--LOVE
