Rick
It is a well known fact that when one sits down with the title company and
realtor involved that the note is made to you at the signing. You own it. At
that moment you own it. After 72 hours the bank modifies the note and puts it
in their name.
That is why no bank can give one the original note. In court the bank will
state they have a certified copy of the note, but not the original note. If
original note was produced the Note would show you own the home before the
monkey got involved.
In common law the original lender is the holder. If they sell it to another it
is worthless without you agreeing to the transfer or it being written in the
sale contract to do.
On Nov 10, 2021, 8:07 AM -0700, Rick Racioppi <drracioppi@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
I got a commercial mortgage through Univest Bank in PA. The day I signed my
promissory note they filled a UCC1 lean trying to take ownership of
everything business and personal. Last year they tried to put my property up
for sheriff's sale. I told the bank I had access to my Federal Reserve TDA
account (strawman account) and I was going to pay off the loan in full the
bank president gave me a payoff number for the loan and a bank account to
have the federal Reserve make a deposit into. As I investigated this unknown
bank account I called my local branch and found out that Univest opened up an
account under my business name without my knowledge or consent. When I was
asking the branch manager about it she thought it was a PPP government loan
for Covid because $400k was deposited into the account. Turns out that $400k
was deposited into that account the same day I signed my promissory note for
the loan for the exact amount of the loan. This means the property is mine
because the note was paid in full from my strawman account the same day I
signed the note. The branch manager accidentally sent me all the records from
this account. On the last days of December last year, the bank withdrew 800k
from that account. the only way that account could have that much money in it
is if they converted it into stock and used this account as an investment
account. They then tried to get the property in civil court, but because they
filed a UCC1 on the property they have to do everything from an
administrative court. They do not have jurisdiction to bring this before a
civil court. If I can get my Remic trust # of CUSIP # I can prove that the
promissory note I signed was converted into securities and stock and I would
get my property and money back
Respectfully,
Dr. Rick Racioppi
The Highest Compliment you can give me is the referral of your friends, and
family members.
Progressive Rehab®
368 North Lewis Rd
Royersford PA 19468
P:610-948-1487
F: 610-948-1499
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 9:40 AM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
rick?
explain more.. what are you asking?
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 9:31 AM Rick Racioppi <drracioppi@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I tried to see if Morgan Stanley could find out if I had a Remic
Trust # and I don't have enough money to have them do a security
Audit on a bank account that got money directly from my Federal
Reserve account.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021, 9:18 AM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
and what did you try? Cusip numbers are for example Case
numbers in court cases
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 8:55 AM Rick Racioppi
<drracioppi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How do you get CUSIP # and D & B number. I have been trying
with know luck.. please help
Rick
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021, 5:18 PM nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx
<nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All Friends and family:
How too get CUSIP # and D & B number ???
I can testify that 1938 Fara was one of the strong tools
to bite those attorneys/ judges.
That was one of the reason I got dismissed and vacate the
" null , void" judgment with juris-diction Challenge of 6
figures. I posted it before, yet most of you missed.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:37, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks, I've been wanting to see what David straight
preaches. To analyze his approach.
On Nov 9, 2021, 12:23 PM -0700, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
Dave goes a bit differnt with his approach. what i
stated before is literal and conceptual. You dont
really have to argue the case when you can just list
all the De facto things in your affidavit basically
its a long way to call out Juris Diction, if thats
what your going for.. Remember court isn't the
building or venue. Its the paperwork. I start out
with the following below then you draw out all the
stuff that puts out the fraud.
goes something like this
STATE OF - DUN AND BRAD #
) Cusip #
A private registered legal business entity
) Cusip # A subsidiary
corporation of UNITED STATES Corporation )
A De Facto for Profit Governmental Services
Corporation ) VS
dba ) An artificial
entity created through fraud,
) and Unlawful Conversion
of natural Name
by the STATE OF
A living Man unlawfully Convicted,
the man being involuntarily held as surety
appearing By special divine appearance of _First,
Middle ; of family of Last
A Living Soul, A man of GOD, Bondservant of Christ,
Non Personam, Sui Juris a Non-representative/Non-agent
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 2:02 PM Rick Miller
<ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That is how it should be, simple and to the point.
David Straight says he begins his cases that way
with a little more verbiage. I have not had the
chance to test the concept, but my concern would be
the administrative tribunal courts would just
ignore your statement and proceed to steam roll
you. Your thoughts?
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:52 AM J_B
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm here by special divine appearance to settle
this matter. I claim common law Juris Diction
and wave the benifit
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:51 PM Rick Miller
<ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
J_B, do you have any information on invoking a
common law court so we do not have to take our
issues into one of their administrative
tribunals where they only deal w/fictions?
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:44 AM J_B
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nelson-
Yes, the truth is right in front your eyes.
As you might have heard the best place to
hide something is right in front of you.
Department of Justice/NSD
FARA Unit
175 N Street, NE
Constitution Square, Building 3 - Room 1.204
Washington, DC 20002
Foreign agents must register under the 1938
Foreign Agent Registration Act which is a
Constitution law from Federal Immigration and
Original Constitution Nationality Act Section
8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii).
A person acting as an attorney for a foreign
principal must be registered to act on the
principal’s behalf.” See, Foreign Agents
Registration Act” (22 USC § 612 et seq.);
Victor Rabinowitz et. at. v. Robert F.
Kennedy,376 US 605. “Failure to file the
"Foreign Agents Registrations Statement" goes
directly to the jurisdiction and lack of
standing to be before the court, and is a
felony pursuant to 18 USC §§ 219, 951. The
conflict of law, interest and allegiance is
obvious. A Lawyer can not make a claim to
your rights , Only you can.
Federal District Court Judge James Alger
Fee's mind-blowing assertion in United States
v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538 (M.D. Pa. 1947)
Attorneys join the Bar to gain group
insurance and bonding benefits. [Also so
their buddies in the fraternity will gang up
on any outsiders].
Counselors pay their own insurance and bonds
and otherwise don't have any reason to join
the Bar, because they aren't involved in the
disposition of public property or addressing
issues related to public employees-- that is,
they aren't working in administrative
capacities as members of an administrative
court.
Attorneys-at-law traditionally function as
property managers involved in the
administration of civil cases in Article I
courts dealing with in-house legislative
"laws" and statutes.
This is why those working in administrative
courts supported by the United States
Districts, the Territorial States of States,
and the Municipal STATES OF STATES are all
required to be "attorneys" and Bar Members by
their employers
Attorneys work in administrative tribunals.
Not judicial courts.
This fact accounts for these frank admissions
about the nature of the federal territorial
and municipal courts and their various
state-of-state franchises operating on our
shores:
"There are no Judicial courts in America and
there has not been since 1789, Judges do not
enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive
Administrators enforce Statues and Codes.
There have not been any Judges in America
since 1789. There have just been
Administrators." FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller
v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178.
"Courts are Administrative Tribunals"
Clearfield Trust, et al v. United States 318
U.S. 363 (1943).
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:30 PM NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://www.natlawreview.com/article/when-lawyers-become-foreign-agents-how-fara-impacts-law-firms
Has anyone ever proven the Patriot myth
that all bar attorneys are required to
register with the DOJ under FARA?
