ok a little bit more in-depth in what you say when you make your special
divine appearance. * this works if you have done it correctly with a "court
of record" and you gave notice to the clerk of "special divine
appearance".. as for the "Court of record papers" this would be your
"argument" if done properly cant be adjudicated by the judge because its a
"proper Court of record"
You go to court, You sit down in the back, Find something you can lean
back, and put your feet on if possible. Make that Concerted Effort to do so
when they call "all rise for the Honorable *MY ass such and such please
stand" This shows the Baliff and Judge if he/she is looking that you are
the one in charge and they are the Public Servant. If you stand like the
other jackasses. You just gave him juris diction with tacit and agreement
When your called and you take your first step, *"I'm hereby special divine
appearance judge to settle this matter to call for a constitutional court
of record to ask for a summary judgment upon the truth and facts placed
upon this record by my documents and I stand firmly upon my rights can I
get that summary judgment, your honor" *
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 2:37 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks, I've been wanting to see what David straight preaches. To analyze
his approach.
On Nov 9, 2021, 12:23 PM -0700, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Dave goes a bit differnt with his approach. what i stated before is
literal and conceptual. You dont really have to argue the case when you
can just list all the De facto things in your affidavit basically its a
long way to call out Juris Diction, if thats what your going for.. Remember
court isn't the building or venue. Its the paperwork. I start out with
the following below then you draw out all the stuff that puts out the fraud.
goes something like this
STATE OF - DUN AND BRAD #
) Cusip #
A private registered legal business entity
) Cusip # A subsidiary corporation of UNITED STATES Corporation
)
A De Facto for Profit Governmental Services Corporation ) VS
dba ) An artificial entity created through fraud,
) and Unlawful
Conversion of natural Name
by the STATE OF
A living Man unlawfully Convicted,
the man being involuntarily held as surety
appearing By special divine appearance of _First, Middle ; of family of
Last
A Living Soul, A man of GOD, Bondservant of Christ, Non Personam, Sui
Juris a Non-representative/Non-agent
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 2:02 PM Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That is how it should be, simple and to the point. David Straight says
he begins his cases that way with a little more verbiage. I have not had
the chance to test the concept, but my concern would be the administrative
tribunal courts would just ignore your statement and proceed to steam roll
you. Your thoughts?
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:52 AM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm here by special divine appearance to settle this matter. I claim
common law Juris Diction and wave the benifit
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:51 PM Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
J_B, do you have any information on invoking a common law court so we
do not have to take our issues into one of their administrative tribunals
where they only deal w/fictions?
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:44 AM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nelson-
Yes, the truth is right in front your eyes. As you might have heard
the best place to hide something is right in front of you.
Department of Justice/NSD
FARA Unit
175 N Street, NE
Constitution Square, Building 3 - Room 1.204
Washington, DC 20002
Foreign agents must register under the 1938 Foreign Agent Registration
Act which is a Constitution law from Federal Immigration and Original
Constitution Nationality Act Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii).
A person acting as an attorney for a foreign principal must be
registered to act on the principal’s behalf.” See, Foreign Agents
Registration Act” (22 USC § 612 et seq.); Victor Rabinowitz et. at. v.
Robert F. Kennedy,376 US 605. “Failure to file the "Foreign Agents
Registrations Statement" goes directly to the jurisdiction and lack of
standing to be before the court, and is a felony pursuant to 18 USC §§
219,
951. The conflict of law, interest and allegiance is obvious. A Lawyer can
not make a claim to your rights , Only you can.
Federal District Court Judge James Alger Fee's mind-blowing assertion
in United States v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538 (M.D. Pa. 1947)
Attorneys join the Bar to gain group insurance and bonding benefits.
[Also so their buddies in the fraternity will gang up on any outsiders].
Counselors pay their own insurance and bonds and otherwise don't have
any reason to join the Bar, because they aren't involved in the
disposition
of public property or addressing issues related to public employees-- that
is, they aren't working in administrative capacities as members of an
administrative court.
Attorneys-at-law traditionally function as property managers involved
in the administration of civil cases in Article I courts dealing with
in-house legislative "laws" and statutes.
This is why those working in administrative courts supported by the
United States Districts, the Territorial States of States, and the
Municipal STATES OF STATES are all required to be "attorneys" and Bar
Members by their employers
Attorneys work in administrative tribunals. Not judicial courts.
This fact accounts for these frank admissions about the nature of the
federal territorial and municipal courts and their various state-of-state
franchises operating on our shores:
"There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since
1789, Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators
enforce Statues and Codes. There have not been any Judges in America since
1789. There have just been Administrators." FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller
v.
PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178.
"Courts are Administrative Tribunals" Clearfield Trust, et al v.
United States 318 U.S. 363 (1943).
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:30 PM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
https://www.natlawreview.com/article/when-lawyers-become-foreign-agents-how-fara-impacts-law-firms
Has anyone ever proven the Patriot myth that all bar attorneys are
required to register with the DOJ under FARA?
