Which item are you speaking of
On Nov 9, 2021, at 3:46 PM, Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do you do this in the form of an affidavit J_B? How and where is this
template applied to an issue?
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:23 PM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dave goes a bit differnt with his approach. what i stated before is literal
and conceptual. You dont really have to argue the case when you can just
list all the De facto things in your affidavit basically its a long way to
call out Juris Diction, if thats what your going for.. Remember court isn't
the building or venue. Its the paperwork. I start out with the following
below then you draw out all the stuff that puts out the fraud.
goes something like this
STATE OF - DUN AND BRAD # )
Cusip #
A private registered legal business entity )
Cusip # A subsidiary corporation of UNITED STATES Corporation )
A De Facto for Profit Governmental Services Corporation ) VS
dba ) An artificial entity created through fraud,
) and Unlawful Conversion of natural Name
by the STATE OF
A living Man unlawfully Convicted,
the man being involuntarily held as surety
appearing By special divine appearance of _First, Middle ; of family of
Last
A Living Soul, A man of GOD, Bondservant of Christ, Non Personam, Sui Juris
a Non-representative/Non-agent
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 2:02 PM Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That is how it should be, simple and to the point. David Straight says he
begins his cases that way with a little more verbiage. I have not had the
chance to test the concept, but my concern would be the administrative
tribunal courts would just ignore your statement and proceed to steam roll
you. Your thoughts?
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:52 AM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm here by special divine appearance to settle this matter. I claim
common law Juris Diction and wave the benifit
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:51 PM Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
J_B, do you have any information on invoking a common law court so we do
not have to take our issues into one of their administrative tribunals
where they only deal w/fictions?
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:44 AM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nelson-
Yes, the truth is right in front your eyes. As you might have heard the
best place to hide something is right in front of you.
Department of Justice/NSD
FARA Unit
175 N Street, NE
Constitution Square, Building 3 - Room 1.204
Washington, DC 20002
Foreign agents must register under the 1938 Foreign Agent Registration
Act which is a Constitution law from Federal Immigration and Original
Constitution Nationality Act Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii).
A person acting as an attorney for a foreign principal must be
registered to act on the principal’s behalf.” See, Foreign Agents
Registration Act” (22 USC § 612 et seq.); Victor Rabinowitz et. at. v.
Robert F. Kennedy,376 US 605. “Failure to file the "Foreign Agents
Registrations Statement" goes directly to the jurisdiction and lack of
standing to be before the court, and is a felony pursuant to 18 USC §§
219, 951. The conflict of law, interest and allegiance is obvious. A
Lawyer can not make a claim to your rights , Only you can.
Federal District Court Judge James Alger Fee's mind-blowing assertion in
United States v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538 (M.D. Pa. 1947)
Attorneys join the Bar to gain group insurance and bonding benefits.
[Also so their buddies in the fraternity will gang up on any outsiders].
Counselors pay their own insurance and bonds and otherwise don't have
any reason to join the Bar, because they aren't involved in the
disposition of public property or addressing issues related to public
employees-- that is, they aren't working in administrative capacities as
members of an administrative court.
Attorneys-at-law traditionally function as property managers involved in
the administration of civil cases in Article I courts dealing with
in-house legislative "laws" and statutes.
This is why those working in administrative courts supported by the
United States Districts, the Territorial States of States, and the
Municipal STATES OF STATES are all required to be "attorneys" and Bar
Members by their employers
Attorneys work in administrative tribunals. Not judicial courts.
This fact accounts for these frank admissions about the nature of the
federal territorial and municipal courts and their various
state-of-state franchises operating on our shores:
"There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since
1789, Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators
enforce Statues and Codes. There have not been any Judges in America
since 1789. There have just been Administrators." FRC v. GE 281 US 464,
Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178.
"Courts are Administrative Tribunals" Clearfield Trust, et al v. United
States 318 U.S. 363 (1943).
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:30 PM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://www.natlawreview.com/article/when-lawyers-become-foreign-agents-how-fara-impacts-law-firms
Has anyone ever proven the Patriot myth that all bar attorneys are
required to register with the DOJ under FARA?
