It will not get to the point where I will be in court. I have judgments and
lies on the property and I want them removed. I need more proof so I can
move forward. The CUSIP number will allow me to go after my money.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021, 10:39 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rick
It is a well known fact that when one sits down with the title company and
realtor involved that the note is made to you at the signing. You own it.
At that moment you own it. After 72 hours the bank modifies the note and
puts it in their name.
That is why no bank can give one the original note. In court the bank will
state they have a certified copy of the note, but not the original note. If
original note was produced the Note would show you own the home before the
monkey got involved.
In common law the original lender is the holder. If they sell it to
another it is worthless without you agreeing to the transfer or it being
written in the sale contract to do.
On Nov 10, 2021, 8:07 AM -0700, Rick Racioppi <drracioppi@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
I got a commercial mortgage through Univest Bank in PA. The day I signed
my promissory note they filled a UCC1 lean trying to take ownership of
everything business and personal. Last year they tried to put my property
up for sheriff's sale. I told the bank I had access to my Federal Reserve
TDA account (strawman account) and I was going to pay off the loan in full
the bank president gave me a payoff number for the loan and a bank account
to have the federal Reserve make a deposit into. As I investigated this
unknown bank account I called my local branch and found out that Univest
opened up an account under my business name without my knowledge or
consent. When I was asking the branch manager about it she thought it was a
PPP government loan for Covid because $400k was deposited into the account.
Turns out that $400k was deposited into that account the same day I signed
my promissory note for the loan for the exact amount of the loan. This
means the property is mine because the note was paid in full from my
strawman account the same day I signed the note. The branch manager
accidentally sent me all the records from this account. On the last days of
December last year, the bank withdrew 800k from that account. the only way
that account could have that much money in it is if they converted it into
stock and used this account as an investment account. They then tried to
get the property in civil court, but because they filed a UCC1 on the
property they have to do everything from an administrative court. They do
not have jurisdiction to bring this before a civil court. If I can get my
Remic trust # of CUSIP # I can prove that the promissory note I signed was
converted into securities and stock and I would get my property and money
back
Respectfully,
Dr. Rick Racioppi
* The Highest Compliment you can give me is the referral of your
friends, and family members.*
* Progressive Rehab**®*
368 North Lewis Rd
Royersford PA 19468
P:610-948-1487
F: 610-948-1499
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 9:40 AM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
rick?
explain more.. what are you asking?
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 9:31 AM Rick Racioppi <drracioppi@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I tried to see if Morgan Stanley could find out if I had a Remic Trust #
and I don't have enough money to have them do a security Audit on a bank
account that got money directly from my Federal Reserve account.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021, 9:18 AM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
and what did you try? Cusip numbers are for example Case numbers in
court cases
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 8:55 AM Rick Racioppi <drracioppi@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
How do you get CUSIP # and D & B number. I have been trying with know
luck.. please help
Rick
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021, 5:18 PM nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx <nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
All Friends and family:
How too get CUSIP # and D & B number ???
I can testify that 1938 Fara was one of the strong tools to bite
those attorneys/ judges.
That was one of the reason I got dismissed and vacate the " null ,
void" judgment with juris-diction Challenge of 6 figures. I posted it
before, yet most of you missed.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
<https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:37, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks, I've been wanting to see what David straight preaches. To
analyze his approach.
On Nov 9, 2021, 12:23 PM -0700, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Dave goes a bit differnt with his approach. what i stated before is
literal and conceptual. You dont really have to argue the case when you
can just list all the De facto things in your affidavit basically its a
long way to call out Juris Diction, if thats what your going for..
Remember
court isn't the building or venue. Its the paperwork. I start out with
the following below then you draw out all the stuff that puts out the
fraud.
goes something like this
STATE OF - DUN AND BRAD #
) Cusip #
A private registered legal business entity
) Cusip # A subsidiary corporation
of UNITED STATES Corporation )
A De Facto for Profit Governmental Services Corporation ) VS
dba ) An artificial entity created through fraud,
) and Unlawful
Conversion of natural Name
by the STATE OF
A living Man unlawfully Convicted,
the man being involuntarily held as surety
appearing By special divine appearance of _First, Middle ; of family
of Last
A Living Soul, A man of GOD, Bondservant of Christ, Non Personam, Sui
Juris a Non-representative/Non-agent
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 2:02 PM Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
That is how it should be, simple and to the point. David Straight
says he begins his cases that way with a little more verbiage. I have
not
had the chance to test the concept, but my concern would be the
administrative tribunal courts would just ignore your statement and
proceed
to steam roll you. Your thoughts?
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:52 AM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm here by special divine appearance to settle this matter. I claim
common law Juris Diction and wave the benifit
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:51 PM Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
J_B, do you have any information on invoking a common law court so we
do not have to take our issues into one of their administrative tribunals
where they only deal w/fictions?
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:44 AM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nelson-
Yes, the truth is right in front your eyes. As you might have heard
the best place to hide something is right in front of you.
Department of Justice/NSD
FARA Unit
175 N Street, NE
Constitution Square, Building 3 - Room 1.204
Washington, DC 20002
Foreign agents must register under the 1938 Foreign Agent
Registration Act which is a Constitution law from Federal Immigration and
Original Constitution Nationality Act Section 8 USC
1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii).
A person acting as an attorney for a foreign principal must be
registered to act on the principal’s behalf.” See, Foreign Agents
Registration Act” (22 USC § 612 et seq.); Victor Rabinowitz et. at. v.
Robert F. Kennedy,376 US 605. “Failure to file the "Foreign Agents
Registrations Statement" goes directly to the jurisdiction and lack of
standing to be before the court, and is a felony pursuant to 18 USC §§
219,
951. The conflict of law, interest and allegiance is obvious. A Lawyer
can
not make a claim to your rights , Only you can.
Federal District Court Judge James Alger Fee's mind-blowing assertion
in United States v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538 (M.D. Pa. 1947)
Attorneys join the Bar to gain group insurance and bonding benefits.
[Also so their buddies in the fraternity will gang up on any outsiders].
Counselors pay their own insurance and bonds and otherwise don't have
any reason to join the Bar, because they aren't involved in the
disposition
of public property or addressing issues related to public employees--
that
is, they aren't working in administrative capacities as members of an
administrative court.
Attorneys-at-law traditionally function as property managers involved
in the administration of civil cases in Article I courts dealing with
in-house legislative "laws" and statutes.
This is why those working in administrative courts supported by the
United States Districts, the Territorial States of States, and the
Municipal STATES OF STATES are all required to be "attorneys" and Bar
Members by their employers
Attorneys work in administrative tribunals. Not judicial courts.
This fact accounts for these frank admissions about the nature of the
federal territorial and municipal courts and their various state-of-state
franchises operating on our shores:
"There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since
1789, Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators
enforce Statues and Codes. There have not been any Judges in America
since
1789. There have just been Administrators." FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller
v.
PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178.
"Courts are Administrative Tribunals" Clearfield Trust, et al v.
United States 318 U.S. 363 (1943).
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:30 PM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
https://www.natlawreview.com/article/when-lawyers-become-foreign-agents-how-fara-impacts-law-firms
Has anyone ever proven the Patriot myth that all bar attorneys are
required to register with the DOJ under FARA?
