Rick
Fellow got nine traffic tickets in one stop. A client of mine heard him asking
for help on some internet thing. So he told him of 1817. Court was the next
day. He hand delivered the 1817 to the judge when he went to court. Then the
court conversation took place.
Since then he has called me to explain in more detail and get advice. I was
able to find out what happened.
On Mar 27, 2021, 10:23 AM -0600, Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Charley, would you mind saying whether the guy registered mailed the 1817
notice to the judge/court or did he file the 1817 notice into an existing
case against him by the fictional STATE OF NEW JERSEY or some other corporate
fiction?
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 8:59 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Go cross the bar. They have no authority. But why go and debate with them
as they are Conn-artists looking for a stake. This just happenec recently
in NJ. The fellow sent the 1817 notice to the court and went to court.
The judge looked at statement and asked attorney what he wanted to do.
The attorney said, I've not had time to research and want court extended.
The fellow immediately said, NO! The judge asked again. The attorney
again wanted time. Again the fellow said, NO!. The judge and attorney
walked out. He went home to PA. A few days later a PA Hwy officer showed
up and wanted to know what happened in NJ. And if he was a Moorish
sovereign or a sovereign citizen. (Fishing expedition) The fellow told
officer that I do not want to talk about it and officer left. They have
no authority once the law is pointed out... The constitution is law.
On Mar 27, 2021, 8:58 AM -0600, Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Your obviously right. But keep in mind most will ignore or go through
these motions if your going the constitution way of things in most
cases. Keep in mind. If your stating these things. Keep in “dry land”
and make it a. Absolute point and never waver from that. You must not
cross the bar. If you do. Your off dry land and on the pirate ship with
the privateer aka the black rob jack ass. If you missed it. It’s in the
phrase. “The construction is the supreme law of the “land”. Pass the
bar you now go into admiralty law. Now if you in. A full common court.
This should be different. You can tell the the military admiralty flag
with fringes on it.
On Mar 27, 2021, at 10:34 AM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Biden wants cops" Starts the article posted. Excerpt from that
article: " because a judge must issue judgments "according to the
known laws and customs of the land" and not "according to his private
sentiments" or "own private judgment." Id., at 69-70.
The reason I bring the constitution to the court telling the judge or
magistrate the law needs honored. (Article 6 constitution). I
believe one should enter the court and require the court to honor
supreme law which is the constitution. Judge or magistrate is
required to obey law.
On Mar 27, 2021, 6:14 AM -0600, veritas ghost
<guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
NO MASK = Lose Custody Of Your Child! (4:24)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=zgxJLCcibMw
Massachusetts 8th Grade Science Teacher Outed as Member of Antifa
That Berated Cops and Children at Recent Protest
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/massachusetts-8th-grade-science-teacher-outed-member-antifa-berated-cops-children-recent-protest/
Depopulation (7:47)
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/depopulation-hugo-talks-lockdown_ylyM58zRFRRGkTi.html
Creepy Bill Gates Says He Knows When the World’s Coronavirus Crisis
Will Be Over – Not This Year
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/creepy-bill-gates-says-knows-worlds-coronavirus-crisis-will-not-year/
Enter Ebola (8:01)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=UWn6CXnv_9Q
Biden Wants Cops Breaking Into Your Home Without a Warrant! (gamble
v u.s (2019) breif overview of objections and justice thomas[i
would read what the other dissenting judges say to, ill also
include a tiny bit of ginsburg]: When the original States declared
their independence, they claimed the powers inherent in sovereignty
.... The Constitution limited but did not abolish the sovereign
powers of the States, which retained `a residuary and inviolable
sovereignty.' The Federalist No. 39, p. 245 (C. Rossiter ed. 1961).
Thus, both the Federal Government and the States wield sovereign
powers, and that is why our system of government is said to be one
of `dual sovereignty.' Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 452, 457 [111
S.Ct. 2395, 115 L.Ed.2d 410] (1991)." Murphy v. National Collegiate
Athletic Assn., 584 U.S. ___, ___, 138 S.Ct. 1461, 1475, 200
L.Ed.2d 854 (2018).
...But there is a difference between the whole and a single part,
and that difference underlies decisions as foundational to our
legal system as McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 4 L.Ed. 579
(1819). There, in terms so directly relevant as to seem presciently
tailored to answer this very objection, Chief Justice Marshall
distinguished precisely between "the people of a State" and "[t]he
people of all the States," id., at 428, 435; between the
"sovereignty which the people of a single state possess"...Stare
decisis has its pedigree in the unwritten common law of England. As
Blackstone explained, the common law included "[e]stablished
customs" and "[e]stablished rules and maxims" that were discerned
and articulated by judges. 1 W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the
Laws of England 68-69 (1765) (Blackstone). In the common-law
system, stare decisis played 1983*1983 an important role because
"judicial decisions [were] the principal and most authoritative
evidence, that [could] be given, of the existence of such a custom
as shall form a part of the common law." Id., at 69. Accordingly,
"precedents and rules must be followed, unless flatly absurd or
unjust," because a judge must issue judgments "according to the
known laws and customs of the land" and not "according to his
private sentiments" or "own private judgment." Id., at 69-70. In
other words, judges were expected to adhere to precedents because
they embodied the very law the judges were bound to
apply...Importantly, however, the common law did not view precedent
as unyielding when it was "most evidently contrary to reason" or
"divine law." Blackstone 69-70. The founding generation recognized
that a "judge may mistake the law." Id., at 71; see also 1 Kent 444
("Even a series of decisions are not always conclusive evidence of
what is law"). And according to Blackstone, judges should disregard
precedent that articulates a rule incorrectly when necessary "to
vindicate the old [rule] from misrepresentation." Blackstone 70;
see also 1 Kent 443 ("If ... any solemnly adjudged case can be
shown to be founded in error, it is no doubt the right and the duty
of the judges who have a similar case before them, to correct the
error"). He went further: When a "former decision is manifestly
absurd or unjust" or fails to conform to reason, it is not simply
"bad law," but "not law" at all. Blackstone 70 (emphasis). This
view—that demonstrably erroneous "blunders" of prior courts should
be corrected—was accepted by state courts throughout the 19th
century. See, e.g., McDowell v. Oyer, 21 Pa. 417, 423 (1853); Guild
v. Eager, 17 Mass. 615, 622 (1822).
Justice GINSBURG, dissenting: In the system established by the
Federal Constitution, however, "ultimate sovereignty" resides in
the governed. Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent
Redistricting Comm'n, 576 U.S. ___, ___, 135 S.Ct. 2652, 2675, 192
L.Ed.2d 704 (2015); Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304,
324-325, 4 L.Ed. 97 (1816); Braun, supra, at 26-30. Insofar as a
crime offends the "peace and dignity" of a sovereign, Lanza, 260
U.S. at 382, 43 S.Ct. 141, that "sovereign" is the people, the
"original fountain of all legitimate authority," The Federalist No.
22, at 152 (A. Hamilton); see Note, Double Prosecution by State and
Federal Governments: Another *1991 Exercise in Federalism, 80 Harv.
L. Rev. 1538, 1542 (1967). 18:15)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=8N6JLjPF0LA
Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg Says Taxing Drivers by the
Mile “Shows a Lot of Promise” and Could be a Way to Fund
Infrastructure Overhaul (VIDEO) (you mean for the whole time you
clowns havent taken care of the infrastructure)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/transportation-secretary-pete-buttigieg-says-taxing-drivers-mile-shows-lot-promise-way-fund-infrastructure-overhaul-video/
Migrant Caravan Members tell FOX News Contributor: ‘Biden Wants Us
Here,’ ‘He Is Opening the Gates’ (Video)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/migrant-caravan-members-biden-wants-us-opening-gates/
Border Patrol Union President: Trump Saw 45-Year Low in Human
Smuggling at the Border — Now It’s All Back (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/border-patrol-union-president-trump-saw-45-year-low-human-smuggling-border-now-back-video/
Taxpayers Stuck with Bill of $392.69 per Person per Night on Hotels
for Illegals Crossing Border
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/taxpayers-stuck-bill-392-69-per-person-per-night-hotels-illegals-crossing-border/
Catholic Priest Who Prayed and Performed Exorcism at US Capitol on
Jan. 6 Faces Expulsion (i got to ask why you clowns are picking on
a priest? (no im not ignoring things priests have done by any
means) oh right you need scapegoats for antifa since you have them
on film planting pipe b)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/catholic-priest-prayed-performed-exorcism-us-capitol-jan-6-faces-expulsion/
Father of Murdered Boulder Police Officer Lashes Out at Liberal
Media for Using his Son’s Death to Promote Gun Control
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/father-murdered-boulder-police-officer-lashes-liberal-media-using-sons-death-promote-gun-control/
USA TODAY RACE & INCLUSION EDITOR FIRED FOR ATTACKING WHITE PEOPLE
(8:18)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/u0aSpuQuzv6L/
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Administrating Your Public Servants" group.
To post to this group, send email to
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
administrating-your-public-servants+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/administrating-your-public-servants?hl=en?hl=en
This is a private communication between living souls who are not
fictitious entities in any way. All communications in this group
are strictly confidential. If you have received this message and
you are not a member of the group, then you agree to keep it
confidential, or delete the message and let the owner of the group
know. Your retention of this private communication is your tacit
agreement to these terms and conditions.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Administrating Your Public Servants" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to
administrating-your-public-servants+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/administrating-your-public-servants/CAKSZ04ustxN-EzKdEJV8vv2Q6Zz8g6KHBU3pz5f-6ktvTp-KFQ%40mail.gmail.com.
