Charley, would you mind saying whether the guy registered mailed the 1817
notice to the judge/court or did he file the 1817 notice into an existing
case against him by the fictional STATE OF NEW JERSEY or some other
corporate fiction?
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 8:59 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Go cross the bar. They have no authority. But why go and debate with them
as they are Conn-artists looking for a stake. This just happenec recently
in NJ. The fellow sent the 1817 notice to the court and went to court. The
judge looked at statement and asked attorney what he wanted to do. The
attorney said, I've not had time to research and want court extended. The
fellow immediately said, NO! The judge asked again. The attorney again
wanted time. Again the fellow said, NO!. The judge and attorney walked out.
He went home to PA. A few days later a PA Hwy officer showed up and wanted
to know what happened in NJ. And if he was a Moorish sovereign or a
sovereign citizen. (Fishing expedition) The fellow told officer that I do
not want to talk about it and officer left. They have no authority once the
law is pointed out... The constitution is law.
On Mar 27, 2021, 8:58 AM -0600, Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Your obviously right. But keep in mind most will ignore or go through
these motions if your going the constitution way of things in most cases.
Keep in mind. If your stating these things. Keep in “dry land” and make it
a. Absolute point and never waver from that. You must not cross the bar.
If you do. Your off dry land and on the pirate ship with the privateer aka
the black rob jack ass. If you missed it. It’s in the phrase. “The
construction is the supreme law of the “land”. Pass the bar you now go into
admiralty law. Now if you in. A full common court. This should be
different. You can tell the the military admiralty flag with fringes on it.
On Mar 27, 2021, at 10:34 AM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Biden wants cops" Starts the article posted. Excerpt from that article: "
because a judge must issue judgments "according to the known laws and
customs of the land" and not "according to his private sentiments" or "own
private judgment." Id., at 69-70.
The reason I bring the constitution to the court telling the judge or
magistrate the law needs honored. (Article 6 constitution). I believe one
should enter the court and require the court to honor supreme law which is
the constitution. Judge or magistrate is required to obey law.
On Mar 27, 2021, 6:14 AM -0600, veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
NO MASK = Lose Custody Of Your Child! (4:24)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=zgxJLCcibMw
Massachusetts 8th Grade Science Teacher Outed as Member of Antifa That
Berated Cops and Children at Recent Protest
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/massachusetts-8th-grade-science-teacher-outed-member-antifa-berated-cops-children-recent-protest/
Depopulation (7:47)
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/depopulation-hugo-talks-lockdown_ylyM58zRFRRGkTi.html
Creepy Bill Gates Says He Knows When the World’s Coronavirus Crisis Will
Be Over – Not This Year
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/creepy-bill-gates-says-knows-worlds-coronavirus-crisis-will-not-year/
Enter Ebola (8:01)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=UWn6CXnv_9Q
Biden Wants Cops Breaking Into Your Home Without a Warrant! (gamble v u.s
(2019) breif overview of objections and justice thomas[i would read what
the other dissenting judges say to, ill also include a tiny bit of
ginsburg]: When the original States declared their independence, they
claimed the powers inherent in sovereignty .... The Constitution limited
but did not abolish the sovereign powers of the States, which retained `a
residuary and inviolable sovereignty.' The Federalist No. 39, p. 245 (C.
Rossiter ed. 1961). Thus, both the Federal Government and the States wield
sovereign powers, and that is why our system of government is said to be
one of `dual sovereignty.' Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 452, 457 [111
S.Ct. 2395, 115 L.Ed.2d 410] (1991)." Murphy v. National Collegiate
Athletic Assn., 584 U.S. ___, ___, 138 S.Ct. 1461, 1475, 200 L.Ed.2d 854
(2018).
...But there is a difference between the whole and a single part, and that
difference underlies decisions as foundational to our legal system as
McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819). There, in terms so
directly relevant as to seem presciently tailored to answer this very
objection, Chief Justice Marshall distinguished precisely between "the
people of a State" and "[t]he people of all the States," id., at 428, 435;
between the "sovereignty which the people of a single state
possess"...Stare decisis has its pedigree in the unwritten common law of
England. As Blackstone explained, the common law included "[e]stablished
customs" and "[e]stablished rules and maxims" that were discerned and
articulated by judges. 1 W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England
68-69 (1765) (Blackstone). In the common-law system, stare decisis played
1983*1983 an important role because "judicial decisions [were] the
principal and most authoritative evidence, that [could] be given, of the
existence of such a custom as shall form a part of the common law." Id., at
69. Accordingly, "precedents and rules must be followed, unless flatly
absurd or unjust," because a judge must issue judgments "according to the
known laws and customs of the land" and not "according to his private
sentiments" or "own private judgment." Id., at 69-70. In other words,
judges were expected to adhere to precedents because they embodied the very
law the judges were bound to apply...Importantly, however, the common law
did not view precedent as unyielding when it was "most evidently contrary
to reason" or "divine law." Blackstone 69-70. The founding generation
recognized that a "judge may mistake the law." Id., at 71; see also 1 Kent
444 ("Even a series of decisions are not always conclusive evidence of what
is law"). And according to Blackstone, judges should disregard precedent
that articulates a rule incorrectly when necessary "to vindicate the old
[rule] from misrepresentation." Blackstone 70; see also 1 Kent 443 ("If ...
any solemnly adjudged case can be shown to be founded in error, it is no
doubt the right and the duty of the judges who have a similar case before
them, to correct the error"). He went further: When a "former decision is
manifestly absurd or unjust" or fails to conform to reason, it is not
simply "bad law," but "not law" at all. Blackstone 70 (emphasis). This
view—that demonstrably erroneous "blunders" of prior courts should be
corrected—was accepted by state courts throughout the 19th century. See,
e.g., McDowell v. Oyer, 21 Pa. 417, 423 (1853); Guild v. Eager, 17 Mass.
615, 622 (1822).
Justice GINSBURG, dissenting: In the system established by the Federal
Constitution, however, "ultimate sovereignty" resides in the governed.
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'n, 576
U.S. ___, ___, 135 S.Ct. 2652, 2675, 192 L.Ed.2d 704 (2015); Martin v.
Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304, 324-325, 4 L.Ed. 97 (1816); Braun, supra, at
26-30. Insofar as a crime offends the "peace and dignity" of a sovereign,
Lanza, 260 U.S. at 382, 43 S.Ct. 141, that "sovereign" is the people, the
"original fountain of all legitimate authority," The Federalist No. 22, at
152 (A. Hamilton); see Note, Double Prosecution by State and Federal
Governments: Another *1991 Exercise in Federalism, 80 Harv. L. Rev. 1538,
1542 (1967). 18:15)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=8N6JLjPF0LA
Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg Says Taxing Drivers by the Mile
“Shows a Lot of Promise” and Could be a Way to Fund Infrastructure Overhaul
(VIDEO) (you mean for the whole time you clowns havent taken care of the
infrastructure)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/transportation-secretary-pete-buttigieg-says-taxing-drivers-mile-shows-lot-promise-way-fund-infrastructure-overhaul-video/
Migrant Caravan Members tell FOX News Contributor: ‘Biden Wants Us Here,’
‘He Is Opening the Gates’ (Video)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/migrant-caravan-members-biden-wants-us-opening-gates/
Border Patrol Union President: Trump Saw 45-Year Low in Human Smuggling at
the Border — Now It’s All Back (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/border-patrol-union-president-trump-saw-45-year-low-human-smuggling-border-now-back-video/
Taxpayers Stuck with Bill of $392.69 per Person per Night on Hotels for
Illegals Crossing Border
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/taxpayers-stuck-bill-392-69-per-person-per-night-hotels-illegals-crossing-border/
Catholic Priest Who Prayed and Performed Exorcism at US Capitol on Jan. 6
Faces Expulsion (i got to ask why you clowns are picking on a priest? (no
im not ignoring things priests have done by any means) oh right you need
scapegoats for antifa since you have them on film planting pipe b)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/catholic-priest-prayed-performed-exorcism-us-capitol-jan-6-faces-expulsion/
Father of Murdered Boulder Police Officer Lashes Out at Liberal Media for
Using his Son’s Death to Promote Gun Control
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/father-murdered-boulder-police-officer-lashes-liberal-media-using-sons-death-promote-gun-control/
USA TODAY RACE & INCLUSION EDITOR FIRED FOR ATTACKING WHITE PEOPLE (8:18)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/u0aSpuQuzv6L/
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Administrating Your Public Servants" group.
To post to this group, send email to
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
administrating-your-public-servants+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/administrating-your-public-servants?hl=en?hl=en
This is a private communication between living souls who are not
fictitious entities in any way. All communications in this group are
strictly confidential. If you have received this message and you are not a
member of the group, then you agree to keep it confidential, or delete the
message and let the owner of the group know. Your retention of this private
communication is your tacit agreement to these terms and conditions.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Administrating Your Public Servants" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to administrating-your-public-servants+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/administrating-your-public-servants/CAKSZ04ustxN-EzKdEJV8vv2Q6Zz8g6KHBU3pz5f-6ktvTp-KFQ%40mail.gmail.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/administrating-your-public-servants/CAKSZ04ustxN-EzKdEJV8vv2Q6Zz8g6KHBU3pz5f-6ktvTp-KFQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.
