JB
Article 1817 refers to this statement
"The Constitution of the United States; Article 1, section,8, clause 17; I'm
not a United States citizen. I'm a state national or free citizen".
Send it or driver to the court clerk or judge. Once the court has it they can
do nothing. Go enjoy your day. If one wants to stop anymore offers on the case
add the following. "Dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction".
On Mar 27, 2021, 10:42 AM -0600, Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Charley. To stop confusion for others following this thread, my response was
meant for things for folks who just go to court and not have other things
such as notices given to the clerk before they go before a judge. As for
this 1817 notice might change this or that. So he might be right saying go
past the bar in this instance. Sorry for the confusion since I have no clue
about this 1817 thing. Please give me details on this and or if it’s just for
NJ. Thanks
On Mar 27, 2021, at 11:59 AM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Go cross the bar. They have no authority. But why go and debate with them
as they are Conn-artists looking for a stake. This just happenec recently
in NJ. The fellow sent the 1817 notice to the court and went to court. The
judge looked at statement and asked attorney what he wanted to do. The
attorney said, I've not had time to research and want court extended. The
fellow immediately said, NO! The judge asked again. The attorney again
wanted time. Again the fellow said, NO!. The judge and attorney walked out.
He went home to PA. A few days later a PA Hwy officer showed up and wanted
to know what happened in NJ. And if he was a Moorish sovereign or a
sovereign citizen. (Fishing expedition) The fellow told officer that I do
not want to talk about it and officer left. They have no authority once the
law is pointed out... The constitution is law.
On Mar 27, 2021, 8:58 AM -0600, Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Your obviously right. But keep in mind most will ignore or go through
these motions if your going the constitution way of things in most cases.
Keep in mind. If your stating these things. Keep in “dry land” and make
it a. Absolute point and never waver from that. You must not cross the
bar. If you do. Your off dry land and on the pirate ship with the
privateer aka the black rob jack ass. If you missed it. It’s in the
phrase. “The construction is the supreme law of the “land”. Pass the bar
you now go into admiralty law. Now if you in. A full common court. This
should be different. You can tell the the military admiralty flag with
fringes on it.
On Mar 27, 2021, at 10:34 AM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Biden wants cops" Starts the article posted. Excerpt from that
article: " because a judge must issue judgments "according to the
known laws and customs of the land" and not "according to his private
sentiments" or "own private judgment." Id., at 69-70.
The reason I bring the constitution to the court telling the judge or
magistrate the law needs honored. (Article 6 constitution). I believe
one should enter the court and require the court to honor supreme law
which is the constitution. Judge or magistrate is required to obey law.
On Mar 27, 2021, 6:14 AM -0600, veritas ghost
<guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
NO MASK = Lose Custody Of Your Child! (4:24)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=zgxJLCcibMw
Massachusetts 8th Grade Science Teacher Outed as Member of Antifa
That Berated Cops and Children at Recent Protest
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/massachusetts-8th-grade-science-teacher-outed-member-antifa-berated-cops-children-recent-protest/
Depopulation (7:47)
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/depopulation-hugo-talks-lockdown_ylyM58zRFRRGkTi.html
Creepy Bill Gates Says He Knows When the World’s Coronavirus Crisis
Will Be Over – Not This Year
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/creepy-bill-gates-says-knows-worlds-coronavirus-crisis-will-not-year/
Enter Ebola (8:01)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=UWn6CXnv_9Q
Biden Wants Cops Breaking Into Your Home Without a Warrant! (gamble v
u.s (2019) breif overview of objections and justice thomas[i would
read what the other dissenting judges say to, ill also include a
tiny bit of ginsburg]: When the original States declared their
independence, they claimed the powers inherent in sovereignty ....
The Constitution limited but did not abolish the sovereign powers of
the States, which retained `a residuary and inviolable sovereignty.'
The Federalist No. 39, p. 245 (C. Rossiter ed. 1961). Thus, both the
Federal Government and the States wield sovereign powers, and that is
why our system of government is said to be one of `dual sovereignty.'
Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 452, 457 [111 S.Ct. 2395, 115 L.Ed.2d
410] (1991)." Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn., 584 U.S.
___, ___, 138 S.Ct. 1461, 1475, 200 L.Ed.2d 854 (2018).
...But there is a difference between the whole and a single part, and
that difference underlies decisions as foundational to our legal
system as McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819).
There, in terms so directly relevant as to seem presciently tailored
to answer this very objection, Chief Justice Marshall distinguished
precisely between "the people of a State" and "[t]he people of all
the States," id., at 428, 435; between the "sovereignty which the
people of a single state possess"...Stare decisis has its pedigree in
the unwritten common law of England. As Blackstone explained, the
common law included "[e]stablished customs" and "[e]stablished rules
and maxims" that were discerned and articulated by judges. 1 W.
Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 68-69 (1765)
(Blackstone). In the common-law system, stare decisis played
1983*1983 an important role because "judicial decisions [were] the
principal and most authoritative evidence, that [could] be given, of
the existence of such a custom as shall form a part of the common
law." Id., at 69. Accordingly, "precedents and rules must be
followed, unless flatly absurd or unjust," because a judge must issue
judgments "according to the known laws and customs of the land" and
not "according to his private sentiments" or "own private judgment."
Id., at 69-70. In other words, judges were expected to adhere to
precedents because they embodied the very law the judges were bound
to apply...Importantly, however, the common law did not view
precedent as unyielding when it was "most evidently contrary to
reason" or "divine law." Blackstone 69-70. The founding generation
recognized that a "judge may mistake the law." Id., at 71; see also 1
Kent 444 ("Even a series of decisions are not always conclusive
evidence of what is law"). And according to Blackstone, judges should
disregard precedent that articulates a rule incorrectly when
necessary "to vindicate the old [rule] from misrepresentation."
Blackstone 70; see also 1 Kent 443 ("If ... any solemnly adjudged
case can be shown to be founded in error, it is no doubt the right
and the duty of the judges who have a similar case before them, to
correct the error"). He went further: When a "former decision is
manifestly absurd or unjust" or fails to conform to reason, it is not
simply "bad law," but "not law" at all. Blackstone 70 (emphasis).
This view—that demonstrably erroneous "blunders" of prior courts
should be corrected—was accepted by state courts throughout the 19th
century. See, e.g., McDowell v. Oyer, 21 Pa. 417, 423 (1853); Guild
v. Eager, 17 Mass. 615, 622 (1822).
Justice GINSBURG, dissenting: In the system established by the
Federal Constitution, however, "ultimate sovereignty" resides in the
governed. Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent
Redistricting Comm'n, 576 U.S. ___, ___, 135 S.Ct. 2652, 2675, 192
L.Ed.2d 704 (2015); Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304, 324-325,
4 L.Ed. 97 (1816); Braun, supra, at 26-30. Insofar as a crime offends
the "peace and dignity" of a sovereign, Lanza, 260 U.S. at 382, 43
S.Ct. 141, that "sovereign" is the people, the "original fountain of
all legitimate authority," The Federalist No. 22, at 152 (A.
Hamilton); see Note, Double Prosecution by State and Federal
Governments: Another *1991 Exercise in Federalism, 80 Harv. L. Rev.
1538, 1542 (1967). 18:15)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=8N6JLjPF0LA
Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg Says Taxing Drivers by the
Mile “Shows a Lot of Promise” and Could be a Way to Fund
Infrastructure Overhaul (VIDEO) (you mean for the whole time you
clowns havent taken care of the infrastructure)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/transportation-secretary-pete-buttigieg-says-taxing-drivers-mile-shows-lot-promise-way-fund-infrastructure-overhaul-video/
Migrant Caravan Members tell FOX News Contributor: ‘Biden Wants Us
Here,’ ‘He Is Opening the Gates’ (Video)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/migrant-caravan-members-biden-wants-us-opening-gates/
Border Patrol Union President: Trump Saw 45-Year Low in Human
Smuggling at the Border — Now It’s All Back (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/border-patrol-union-president-trump-saw-45-year-low-human-smuggling-border-now-back-video/
Taxpayers Stuck with Bill of $392.69 per Person per Night on Hotels
for Illegals Crossing Border
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/taxpayers-stuck-bill-392-69-per-person-per-night-hotels-illegals-crossing-border/
Catholic Priest Who Prayed and Performed Exorcism at US Capitol on
Jan. 6 Faces Expulsion (i got to ask why you clowns are picking on a
priest? (no im not ignoring things priests have done by any means) oh
right you need scapegoats for antifa since you have them on film
planting pipe b)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/catholic-priest-prayed-performed-exorcism-us-capitol-jan-6-faces-expulsion/
Father of Murdered Boulder Police Officer Lashes Out at Liberal Media
for Using his Son’s Death to Promote Gun Control
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/father-murdered-boulder-police-officer-lashes-liberal-media-using-sons-death-promote-gun-control/
USA TODAY RACE & INCLUSION EDITOR FIRED FOR ATTACKING WHITE PEOPLE
(8:18)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/u0aSpuQuzv6L/
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Administrating Your Public Servants" group.
To post to this group, send email to
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
administrating-your-public-servants+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/administrating-your-public-servants?hl=en?hl=en
This is a private communication between living souls who are not
fictitious entities in any way. All communications in this group are
strictly confidential. If you have received this message and you are
not a member of the group, then you agree to keep it confidential, or
delete the message and let the owner of the group know. Your
retention of this private communication is your tacit agreement to
these terms and conditions.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Administrating Your Public Servants" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to
administrating-your-public-servants+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/administrating-your-public-servants/CAKSZ04ustxN-EzKdEJV8vv2Q6Zz8g6KHBU3pz5f-6ktvTp-KFQ%40mail.gmail.com.
