"Biden wants cops" Starts the article posted. Excerpt from that article: "
because a judge must issue judgments "according to the known laws and customs
of the land" and not "according to his private sentiments" or "own private
judgment." Id., at 69-70.
The reason I bring the constitution to the court telling the judge or
magistrate the law needs honored. (Article 6 constitution). I believe one
should enter the court and require the court to honor supreme law which is the
constitution. Judge or magistrate is required to obey law.
On Mar 27, 2021, 6:14 AM -0600, veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
NO MASK = Lose Custody Of Your Child! (4:24)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=zgxJLCcibMw
Massachusetts 8th Grade Science Teacher Outed as Member of Antifa That
Berated Cops and Children at Recent Protest
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/massachusetts-8th-grade-science-teacher-outed-member-antifa-berated-cops-children-recent-protest/
Depopulation (7:47)
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/depopulation-hugo-talks-lockdown_ylyM58zRFRRGkTi.html
Creepy Bill Gates Says He Knows When the World’s Coronavirus Crisis Will Be
Over – Not This Year
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/creepy-bill-gates-says-knows-worlds-coronavirus-crisis-will-not-year/
Enter Ebola (8:01)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=UWn6CXnv_9Q
Biden Wants Cops Breaking Into Your Home Without a Warrant! (gamble v u.s
(2019) breif overview of objections and justice thomas[i would read what the
other dissenting judges say to, ill also include a tiny bit of ginsburg]:
When the original States declared their independence, they claimed the powers
inherent in sovereignty .... The Constitution limited but did not abolish the
sovereign powers of the States, which retained `a residuary and inviolable
sovereignty.' The Federalist No. 39, p. 245 (C. Rossiter ed. 1961). Thus,
both the Federal Government and the States wield sovereign powers, and that
is why our system of government is said to be one of `dual sovereignty.'
Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 452, 457 [111 S.Ct. 2395, 115 L.Ed.2d 410]
(1991)." Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn., 584 U.S. ___, ___, 138
S.Ct. 1461, 1475, 200 L.Ed.2d 854 (2018).
...But there is a difference between the whole and a single part, and that
difference underlies decisions as foundational to our legal system as
McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819). There, in terms so
directly relevant as to seem presciently tailored to answer this very
objection, Chief Justice Marshall distinguished precisely between "the people
of a State" and "[t]he people of all the States," id., at 428, 435; between
the "sovereignty which the people of a single state possess"...Stare decisis
has its pedigree in the unwritten common law of England. As Blackstone
explained, the common law included "[e]stablished customs" and "[e]stablished
rules and maxims" that were discerned and articulated by judges. 1 W.
Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 68-69 (1765) (Blackstone). In
the common-law system, stare decisis played 1983*1983 an important role
because "judicial decisions [were] the principal and most authoritative
evidence, that [could] be given, of the existence of such a custom as shall
form a part of the common law." Id., at 69. Accordingly, "precedents and
rules must be followed, unless flatly absurd or unjust," because a judge must
issue judgments "according to the known laws and customs of the land" and not
"according to his private sentiments" or "own private judgment." Id., at
69-70. In other words, judges were expected to adhere to precedents because
they embodied the very law the judges were bound to apply...Importantly,
however, the common law did not view precedent as unyielding when it was
"most evidently contrary to reason" or "divine law." Blackstone 69-70. The
founding generation recognized that a "judge may mistake the law." Id., at
71; see also 1 Kent 444 ("Even a series of decisions are not always
conclusive evidence of what is law"). And according to Blackstone, judges
should disregard precedent that articulates a rule incorrectly when necessary
"to vindicate the old [rule] from misrepresentation." Blackstone 70; see also
1 Kent 443 ("If ... any solemnly adjudged case can be shown to be founded in
error, it is no doubt the right and the duty of the judges who have a similar
case before them, to correct the error"). He went further: When a "former
decision is manifestly absurd or unjust" or fails to conform to reason, it is
not simply "bad law," but "not law" at all. Blackstone 70 (emphasis). This
view—that demonstrably erroneous "blunders" of prior courts should be
corrected—was accepted by state courts throughout the 19th century. See,
e.g., McDowell v. Oyer, 21 Pa. 417, 423 (1853); Guild v. Eager, 17 Mass. 615,
622 (1822).
Justice GINSBURG, dissenting: In the system established by the Federal
Constitution, however, "ultimate sovereignty" resides in the governed.
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'n, 576
U.S. ___, ___, 135 S.Ct. 2652, 2675, 192 L.Ed.2d 704 (2015); Martin v.
Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304, 324-325, 4 L.Ed. 97 (1816); Braun, supra, at
26-30. Insofar as a crime offends the "peace and dignity" of a sovereign,
Lanza, 260 U.S. at 382, 43 S.Ct. 141, that "sovereign" is the people, the
"original fountain of all legitimate authority," The Federalist No. 22, at
152 (A. Hamilton); see Note, Double Prosecution by State and Federal
Governments: Another *1991 Exercise in Federalism, 80 Harv. L. Rev. 1538,
1542 (1967). 18:15)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=8N6JLjPF0LA
Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg Says Taxing Drivers by the Mile
“Shows a Lot of Promise” and Could be a Way to Fund Infrastructure Overhaul
(VIDEO) (you mean for the whole time you clowns havent taken care of the
infrastructure)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/transportation-secretary-pete-buttigieg-says-taxing-drivers-mile-shows-lot-promise-way-fund-infrastructure-overhaul-video/
Migrant Caravan Members tell FOX News Contributor: ‘Biden Wants Us Here,’ ‘He
Is Opening the Gates’ (Video)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/migrant-caravan-members-biden-wants-us-opening-gates/
Border Patrol Union President: Trump Saw 45-Year Low in Human Smuggling at
the Border — Now It’s All Back (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/border-patrol-union-president-trump-saw-45-year-low-human-smuggling-border-now-back-video/
Taxpayers Stuck with Bill of $392.69 per Person per Night on Hotels for
Illegals Crossing Border
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/taxpayers-stuck-bill-392-69-per-person-per-night-hotels-illegals-crossing-border/
Catholic Priest Who Prayed and Performed Exorcism at US Capitol on Jan. 6
Faces Expulsion (i got to ask why you clowns are picking on a priest? (no im
not ignoring things priests have done by any means) oh right you need
scapegoats for antifa since you have them on film planting pipe b)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/catholic-priest-prayed-performed-exorcism-us-capitol-jan-6-faces-expulsion/
Father of Murdered Boulder Police Officer Lashes Out at Liberal Media for
Using his Son’s Death to Promote Gun Control
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/father-murdered-boulder-police-officer-lashes-liberal-media-using-sons-death-promote-gun-control/
USA TODAY RACE & INCLUSION EDITOR FIRED FOR ATTACKING WHITE PEOPLE (8:18)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/u0aSpuQuzv6L/
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Administrating Your Public Servants" group.
To post to this group, send email to
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
administrating-your-public-servants+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/administrating-your-public-servants?hl=en?hl=en
This is a private communication between living souls who are not fictitious
entities in any way. All communications in this group are strictly
confidential. If you have received this message and you are not a member of
the group, then you agree to keep it confidential, or delete the message and
let the owner of the group know. Your retention of this private communication
is your tacit agreement to these terms and conditions.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Administrating Your Public Servants" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to administrating-your-public-servants+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/administrating-your-public-servants/CAKSZ04ustxN-EzKdEJV8vv2Q6Zz8g6KHBU3pz5f-6ktvTp-KFQ%40mail.gmail.com.
