[access-uk] Re: BT Spam filtering nonsense
- From: Shaun O'Connor <capricorn8159@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:13:57 +0100
I freely admit to being a cynic.*smile*
On 17/08/2014 16:11, Clive Jacobs wrote:
> How cynical, and how true. CJ.
> On 17/08/2014 15:06, Shaun O'Connor wrote:
>> they are too busy pandering to the NSA in America and GCHQ over here
>> in the uk.
>> On 17/08/2014 15:34, Jackie Brown wrote:
>>> This is very interesting. We both have BT addresses, but don't get what I
>>> would consider to be spam messages. Yet it treats most of our Email list
>>> messages as spam. Goodness knows what they are up to, but they must be
>>> losing customers hand over fist at this rate? There is nobody you can even
>>> contact to have a conversation with about what is going on at BT, that is
>>> how little regard they have for their customers. We shouldn't have to
>>> change Email accounts to get round the problem, I wonder what Ofcom would
>>> make of it?
>>>
>>> The moral of this story? Ho-Hum! Don't use BT if you are due for a new
>>> contract or looking to change providers.
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Jackie Brown
>>> Emails: jackieannbrown62@xxxxxxxxx
>>> thebrownsplace@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Twitter: @thebrownsplace
>>> Skype: Thejackmate
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>>> Clive Jacobs
>>> Sent: 17 August 2014 15:19
>>> To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: [access-uk] Re: BT Spam filtering nonsense
>>>
>>> Hi, I seem to be getting this lists posts with BT to date. What is
>>> irritating is that on our BTInternet address which we do not use and have
>>> never used we have recently received an increasing number of spam on the BT
>>> address. As we have never used it the only conclusion has to be that it
>>> seems BT are the culprits and are guilty of spamming us and I suspect many
>>> others. We may bee soon seeking for alternative options to BT.
>>>
>>> CJ.
>>>
>>> On 17/08/2014 14:05, Shaun O'Connor wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I recommend anyone who is subscribed via a bt account to unsubscribe
>>> and then use an alternative account, there is NO reason BT should be
>>> classifying this group as spam. and they would likely not be very
>>> forthcoming in explaining their reasoning either.(but that is another story
>>> altogether)
>>>
>>> On 17/08/2014 14:15, Mike Ray wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> In the last three or four weeks I have suddenly been getting
>>> very few
>>> messages from access-uk.
>>>
>>> I spoke to Mo and he suggested this might be BT's
>>> over-zealous
>>> spam-filtering, which is incredibly hard to turn off because
>>> the site is
>>> not very accessible and the setting is buried deep, a bit
>>> like the
>>> Vogon's planning application to demolish the Earth.
>>>
>>> So I have unsubscribed from access-uk on BT and rejoined
>>> from my
>>> raspberryvi account.
>>>
>>> I am instantly getting stuff from the list again.
>>>
>>> So if you're suddenly getting very little stuff from the
>>> list and you're
>>> a BT customer, it's their fault. Oh...of course...you
>>> probably won't
>>> get this message.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PRIVACY IS A BASIC RIGHT - NOT A CONCESSION
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
>>> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
>>> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
>>> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> ** and in the Subject line type
>>> ** unsubscribe
>>> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
>>> ** immediately-following link:-
>>> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
>>> ** or send a message, to
>>> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>> --
>> *_PRIVACY IS A BASIC RIGHT - NOT A CONCESSION _*
>
--
*_PRIVACY IS A BASIC RIGHT - NOT A CONCESSION _*
Other related posts:
