[Wittrs] Re: Strawson on Experience and Experiencers

  • From: "SWM" <SWMirsky@xxxxxxx>
  • To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:18:20 -0000


--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "BruceD" <blroadies@...> wrote:

<snip>

>
> --- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "SWM" <SWMirsky@> wrote:
>
> > We are in agreement on the necessity of an experiencer in the above 
> > formulation. Where we have disagreed is over what it means to be an 
> > "experiencer". -- SWM
>
> Just what dos it mean by your lights? I'll look around and see if you specify 
> elsewhere.
>
> bruce
>
> =========================================

I don't even know how to begin answering this question after all the 
discussions we've had to date. What do you think I've been writing, on this and 
all the other lists, all this time? What have we been arguing about??? -- SWM

=========================================
Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/

Other related posts: