[windows2000] Re: sysprep

  • From: Frank Monroe <Frank.Monroe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 16:49:42 -0400

Yes.  And, other companies have been doing it for years.  But, it seems to
be a bigger deal with MS does it.

-----Original Message-----
From: George Lemos [mailto:listreader@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 1:49 PM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: sysprep



I hate activation. But I understand why its there.
Everything is going to be like that one day.




> -----Original Message-----
> From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jonathan Kadoo
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 9:40 AM
> To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [windows2000] Re: sysprep
>
>
>
> The only thing with that is if you have to reimage the machine you have
> to call microsoft to get activated again.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Lemos [mailto:listreader@xxxxxxxxxxxx]=20
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 8:30 PM
> To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [windows2000] Re: sysprep
>
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
> > [mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jonathan Kadoo
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 9:27 AM
> > To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [windows2000] sysprep
> >
> >
> > I just got a bunch of new dell workstations.  I want to create an=20
> > image and then put the image on all the workstations.  I was just=20
> > wondering if I have to sysprep the workstation that I create the image
>
> > from?  What are the downsides to not running sysprep first?
> >
> > The reason I ask is that Dell installs Windox xp pro on the=20
> > workstations but I am required to activate the machine with MS.  I am=20
> > trying to avoid the hassles of doing that.
> >
> > Thanks for you help in advance
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
>
>
>
> Jonathan, I believe you must sysprep to wipe out the GUID so there are
> not network conflicts when the image is installed on the new
> workstations. Seems like more work to me then just activating the
> already installed windows XP pro OS's? I would just do that! Unless
> there's some underlying facts I am not aware of.
>
> -George
>
>
>
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> =3D=3D=3D=
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
> mode or view archives use the below link.
>
> http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
>
> ==================================
> To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
> mode or view archives use the below link.
>
> http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
>


==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.

http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm

==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.

http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm

Other related posts: