Darn, I really did mean to add that. Thanks! >-----Original Message----- >From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jonathan Chan >Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:30 PM >To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [windows2000] Re: Sus and apache? > > > >At 02:25 PM 10/11/2002, you wrote: > >>I hear people (mostly Linux users) say how un-secure Windows is >out the box, >>and that for the most part is true, however, Unic/Linux and so >forth is more >>secure because dummies like me that doesn't have a clue, can't >get the thing >>running in the first place, thus, if it isn't running, wouldn't >you say that >>is REALLY secure? LOL!!! :-) > > >*nices are more secure out of the box because not everything is enabled by >default. > > >================================== >To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation >mode or view archives use the below link. > >http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm > --- It's lights OUT for you viruses! Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.401 / Virus Database: 226 - Release Date: 10/9/2002 ================================== To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm