[windows2000] Re: Sus and apache?
- From: "Costanzo, Ray" <rcostanzo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:26:55 -0400
Pffft. That means that it's the person who's responsible for your WWW
servers is the one keeping you employed. If people know what the hell
they're doing, IIS doesn't cause any problems. I installed W2K server on
our intranet server a few months back instead of letting our jackass
department doing it, and it's the most problem free server here, if I may
toot my own horn for a bit! ;]
Ray at work
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Dokey [mailto:adokey@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:54 PM
> To: 'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: [windows2000] Re: Sus and apache?
>
>
>
> ... Well, I guess it does in that it's deficiencies keep me
> busy and that
> keeps me employed.
>
> :)
>
> -Aaron
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Other related posts:
