[va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- From: "Larry Marsh" <larrym@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <va-richmond-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:11:23 -0400
There are times when I really like to see the responses from those that
have knowledge relating to the request. I believe it is now that we can
still respond only to the sender as it is.
Larry D. Marsh
larrym@xxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: va-richmond-general-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:va-richmond-general-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robin
Ruth
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 6:53 PM
To: va-richmond-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [va-richmond-general] Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
It appears that, as the list administrator, I can choose an option
called
"Reply to Sender" which will "forcibly set the Reply-To: header to be
the
address the mail came from." This would prevent accidentally replying
to
the whole listserv when you meant to reply to just the sender.
Could I get a vote on whether you want to try this option? Do you want
to
experiment with it and decide if we want to keep it that way?
I'm not sure what would happen if, with this option selected, you
clicked
"Reply to All" -- we would need to try selecting the "Reply to Sender"
option and see how it worked and if we wanted to keep it that way.
You are subscribed to VA-Richmond-General. To unsubscribe, send email to
va-richmond-general-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the
Subject field. To adjust other settings (vacation, digest, etc.) please
visit, //www.freelists.org/list/va-richmond-general.
You are subscribed to VA-Richmond-General. To unsubscribe, send email to
va-richmond-general-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject
field. To adjust other settings (vacation, digest, etc.) please visit,
//www.freelists.org/list/va-richmond-general.
Other related posts:
