[va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- From: Deannamail@xxxxxxx
- To: va-richmond-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 05:57:00 EDT
Robin, it's good of you to take a vote on this. I strongly recommend leaving
the default as it is, a reply to all of the listserv. That's the major point
of a mailing list. Any of us can, and do, initiate off-line conversations by
replacing the To: recipient default with the email of the sender.
Deanna
In a message dated 4/27/2006 3:57:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
robin.ruth@xxxxxxx writes:
> It appears that, as the list administrator, I can choose an option called
> "Reply to Sender" which will "forcibly set the Reply-To: header to be the
> address the mail came from." This would prevent accidentally replying to
> the whole listserv when you meant to reply to just the sender.
>
> Could I get a vote on whether you want to try this option? Do you want to
> experiment with it and decide if we want to keep it that way?
>
Other related posts:
