[va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All

Robin, it's good of you to take a vote on this.  I strongly recommend leaving 
the default as it is, a reply to all of the listserv.  That's the major point 
of a mailing list.  Any of us can, and do, initiate off-line conversations by 
replacing the To: recipient default with the email of the sender.

Deanna

In a message dated 4/27/2006 3:57:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
robin.ruth@xxxxxxx writes:

> It appears that, as the list administrator, I can choose an option called
> "Reply to Sender" which will "forcibly set the Reply-To: header to be the
> address the mail came from."  This would prevent accidentally replying to
> the whole listserv when you meant to reply to just the sender.
> 
> Could I get a vote on whether you want to try this option?  Do you want to
> experiment with it and decide if we want to keep it that way?
>

Other related posts: