[va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All

I also would like it to stay the way it is. The questions and follow-ups are of interest to me, as well. Since we all need reminders periodically and we get new members, it might be a good idea to send out a periodic reminder of how it is supposed to work. And thanks, Robin, for minding our network for us.

ANN

On Apr 28, 2006, at 5:57 AM, Deannamail@xxxxxxx wrote:

Robin, it's good of you to take a vote on this.  I strongly recommend leaving the default as it is, a reply to all of the listserv.  That's the major point of a mailing list.  Any of us can, and do, initiate off-line conversations by replacing the To: recipient default with the email of the sender.

Deanna

In a message dated 4/27/2006 3:57:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time, robin.ruth@xxxxxxx writes:

It appears that, as the list administrator, I can choose an option called
"Reply to Sender" which will "forcibly set the Reply-To: header to be the
address the mail came from."  This would prevent accidentally replying to
the whole listserv when you meant to reply to just the sender.

Could I get a vote on whether you want to try this option?  Do you want to
experiment with it and decide if we want to keep it that way?


Other related posts: