There are times when I really like to see the responses from those that have knowledge relating to the request. I believe it is now that we can still respond only to the sender as it is. Larry D. Marsh larrym@xxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: va-richmond-general-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:va-richmond-general-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robin Ruth Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 6:53 PM To: va-richmond-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [va-richmond-general] Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All It appears that, as the list administrator, I can choose an option called "Reply to Sender" which will "forcibly set the Reply-To: header to be the address the mail came from." This would prevent accidentally replying to the whole listserv when you meant to reply to just the sender. Could I get a vote on whether you want to try this option? Do you want to experiment with it and decide if we want to keep it that way? I'm not sure what would happen if, with this option selected, you clicked "Reply to All" -- we would need to try selecting the "Reply to Sender" option and see how it worked and if we wanted to keep it that way. You are subscribed to VA-Richmond-General. To unsubscribe, send email to va-richmond-general-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. To adjust other settings (vacation, digest, etc.) please visit, //www.freelists.org/list/va-richmond-general. You are subscribed to VA-Richmond-General. To unsubscribe, send email to va-richmond-general-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. To adjust other settings (vacation, digest, etc.) please visit, //www.freelists.org/list/va-richmond-general.