[va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- From: "Bob Cole" <plmhp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <va-richmond-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:19:09 -0400
I'd like to try it,
Bob Cole
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robin Ruth" <robin.ruth@xxxxxxx>
To: <va-richmond-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 6:53 PM
Subject: [va-richmond-general] Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
> It appears that, as the list administrator, I can choose an option called
> "Reply to Sender" which will "forcibly set the Reply-To: header to be the
> address the mail came from." This would prevent accidentally replying to
> the whole listserv when you meant to reply to just the sender.
>
> Could I get a vote on whether you want to try this option? Do you want to
> experiment with it and decide if we want to keep it that way?
>
> I'm not sure what would happen if, with this option selected, you clicked
> "Reply to All" -- we would need to try selecting the "Reply to Sender"
> option and see how it worked and if we wanted to keep it that way.
>
> You are subscribed to VA-Richmond-General. To unsubscribe, send email to
> va-richmond-general-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the
Subject field. To adjust other settings (vacation, digest, etc.) please
visit, //www.freelists.org/list/va-richmond-general.
>
>
You are subscribed to VA-Richmond-General. To unsubscribe, send email to
va-richmond-general-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject
field. To adjust other settings (vacation, digest, etc.) please visit,
//www.freelists.org/list/va-richmond-general.
Other related posts:
