[va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- From: "Al Warfield" <warfield101@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <va-richmond-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:35:36 -0400
Why don't we try it and see how it works? That was an option too. Maybe for one
week or maybe a month so people can really see how it works and not just react.
I think many of the voters for keeping it like it is don't realize that you can
still "reply all", can't you? If you can do that for other emails - decide
which to do that is - why can't you do it for the listerve so that people have
to think before hitting the send button. I think it would be an improvement and
wouldn't deter the back and forth conversations.
This listserve has been terribly abused in my opinion, and in this case change
would be a good thing.
Al
----- Original Message -----
From: Ann Brooks
To: va-richmond-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 9:35 AM
Subject: [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
I also would like it to stay the way it is. The questions and follow-ups are of
interest to me, as well. Since we all need reminders periodically and we get
new members, it might be a good idea to send out a periodic reminder of how it
is supposed to work. And thanks, Robin, for minding our network for us.
ANN
On Apr 28, 2006, at 5:57 AM, Deannamail@xxxxxxx wrote:
Robin, it's good of you to take a vote on this. I strongly recommend leaving
the default as it is, a reply to all of the listserv. That's the major point
of a mailing list. Any of us can, and do, initiate off-line conversations by
replacing the To: recipient default with the email of the sender.
Deanna
In a message dated 4/27/2006 3:57:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
robin.ruth@xxxxxxx writes:
It appears that, as the list administrator, I can choose an option called
"Reply to Sender" which will "forcibly set the Reply-To: header to be the
address the mail came from." This would prevent accidentally replying to
the whole listserv when you meant to reply to just the sender.
Could I get a vote on whether you want to try this option? Do you want to
experiment with it and decide if we want to keep it that way?
- References:
- [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- From: Deannamail
- [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- From: Ann Brooks
Other related posts:
- » [va-richmond-general] Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- » [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- » [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- » [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- » [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- » [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- » [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- » [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- » [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- » [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- » [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- » [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- » [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- » [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- » [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- » [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- From: Deannamail
- [va-richmond-general] Re: Reply to Sender vs. Reply to All
- From: Ann Brooks