[THIN] Re: OT: Question for Trend A/V users

  • From: "Foote, Eric" <EFoote@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:14:31 -0400

Evan,
We had McAfee and replaced it with Trend two years ago (and just signed up for 
another three years).  Trend has been outstanding in every aspect of our 
deployment (400+Wintel servers, 8000+ workstations, Exchange 2000, and gateway 
protection).  As for deployment - we use the Control Manager server and 
distributed Master servers around our enterprise. We have up to 1500 
workstation reporting to a master server. We can push updates from one central 
console. SQL is required at the master server, but we already had it for 
software delivery reasons.  We just completed our upgrade to OScan 7, without 
touching a workstation - very nice functionality. McAfee+ePO was a disaster for 
us - it never worked right, and we had weekly issues with servers spinning out 
of control.
 
Go Trend all the way...
 
Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of 
Evan Mann
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 12:08 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: Question for Trend A/V users


Trying to find out how people have deployed OfficeScan to a large office area 
network.  I'm going to buy McAfee or Trend, so far McAfee is in my favor 
because of agent based methods  I have 80 offices, 1200 users (alwyas 
expanding) with Symantec Enterprise A/V.  They deploy as follows: 1 master 
server for everything, sub servers can be deployed at other sites so clients 
can pull updates from those servers, instead of across WAN links to the master 
server.


Both Trend and McAfee seem to have similar approaches in setup. 1  master 
server with options for deployment poitns, which is basically a location the 
masrter server updates, then you set clients to those deployment points to get 
their updates.  I do not want clients all updating to my master server for 
bandwidth issues.
 
My trend SE recommended I pout an officescan server in every site, instead of 1 
officescan server, with 80 deployment points.  Some of the functionality of 
OfficeScan server requires MSDE and/orSQL, which I'm not deloying at every 
site.  So when I got off the call with the SE, my interest in trend dwindled 
some.


I've talked to 1 person on the list who has around 1200 users per server (said 
trend recommends 1000 max).  He does all deployments from that 1 PC, so it's 
not exactly how I plan to operate, but it shows me the SE I spoke with at 
Trend's recommendation wasn't exactly necessary.
 
I'm debating towards Trend or McAfee+ePO, and so far McAfee is on top becaue 
ePO is agent based which assists greatly in updating.
  _____  

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Foote, Eric
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 11:54 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: Question for Trend A/V users


We have over 8,000 users on the whole Trend Suite.
 
Send me a note off list with any specific questions that you have.
 
Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of 
Evan Mann
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 11:03 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] OT: Question for Trend A/V users



Do any of the people on the list use Trend OfficeScan on client and/or server 
in a wide area deployment across many offices?  I'm trying to get some real 
world info on large deployments.  

Other related posts: