[TCUG] Re: 'Close associated' signals
- From: mervyn.hallworth@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:59:15 +0100
Grahame,
That's really the point - we do tend to get complaints where we don't use
far-side secondaries, but it seems to me that on certain junctions
('simple' junctions where the phasing is not split) there is no need for it
- we should provide them with the signal they require.
Mervyn
________________________________________________________________________
The information in this email (and any attachment) may be for the
intended recipient only. If you know you are not the intended recipient,
please do not use or disclose the information in any way and please
delete this email (and any attachment) from your system.
Service of legal documents is not accepted by email
________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
Other related posts:
