[sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- From: rick.rotramel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 16:21:27 -0700
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Dickson [SMTP:dickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:53 PM
> To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
Reread the constitution again, it says "all back dues or a
reinstatement
> fee". Trouble is there is no attached schedule for the reinstatement fee.
>
> SAC has always pro-rated dues for renewing members the same as for new
> members. It's just more noticable this year due to the newsletter
> problems last year and the lateness of handing off the treasury.
>
> -Paul
>
Paul,
I don't think so, show me a member who paid a pro-rated renewal in
the past.
Rick R.
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- From: Paul Dickson
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- From: Paul Dickson