[sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
- From: rick.rotramel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 16:28:52 -0700
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SaguaroAstro@xxxxxxx [SMTP:SaguaroAstro@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:02 PM
> To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC 2002 Budget and 2003 Recommendations
essentially reduce tier dues. By adding a penalty on top of a full
years
> dues, we can increase the timeliness of renewals and income as well. I
> believe there was just some confusion on the wording here but in
> retrospect
> it seems pretty clear to me. I would propose if any action is taken here,
> it
> be the establishment of a schedule of reinstatement fees.
>
> BTW, In past years I cannot recall pro rating of dues for late renewing
> members. This is the first time I've seen this done.
>
> Rick Tejera
> Editor SACnews
Rick T:
You are correct sir, never in the past have members been given a
pro-rating on renewal for being late.
Otherwise, everyone would do that and get cheaper dues rates!!!
Rick R.
SAC
Other related posts:
