Hi all, I have a question for those who have heard of the recent "Taster's Choice" case in California, where a jury awarded some ungodly sum of money to a model whose photo was used by Nestle though they had paid him for a shoot intended for another of their products. What are the implications for a model release if the purpose is stock photography? Does this make the concept of stock photography a risky proposition? Regards, Neil Gould -------------------------------------- Terra Tu AV - www.terratu.com Technical Graphics & Media