At 09:31 PM 2/9/2005, you wrote: >Why, Jerry? I haven't lost a case yet ;-) Sometimes it's not what is "fair" to "make someone whole" again . . . plus legal fees . . . which is what many might think is deserving (at the least). Without reading all the facts available, that amount smells to me as if it contains significant "punitive" damages which are measured on an entirely different scale . . . an amount sizeable enough to make the defendant feel some pain of "punishment" . . . and one of the clews is the posting here of it being 5% of the profit. Large corporations with very deep pockets wouldn't even blink at $100k and would that give cause to think twice about doing it again? Sometimes yes, but sadly many times no. Go high enough into the rarified air of the wood-grained offices of Fortune 500 corporations and it's all about money; nothing else matters much. One might debate how "punitive" damages should be awarded/disbursed . . . and whether they should go completely to the plaintiff . . . and I think that question has never had a very satisfactory solution . . . and in the absence of one it leaves the plaintiff as its recipient. -- John