> THANKS! At least I know my memory is still intact. That is how I remember it. > Ashame they could not incorporate a RF into the body. I own an Olympus XA with > a 35mm F2.8 and it is smaller AND has a RF. Is there a reason Maitani (the > designer) was able to do this and Wasske was not? I mean, is the Sonnar lens > the reason? Too large? I also have used my XA extensively the issue being it vignettes like a son of a gun. As I tend to print full frame black border this is quite noticeable. Though I don't mind vignetting. I kind of like it. I'd buy a vignetting filter if they sold one. Not the anti vignetting filters like they sell for true wides- but a vignetting filter to darken edges. Mark William Rabiner --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list