Frank, the Leica M8 has not impressed me, I have seen prints and images in Flickr and there is nothing to say: wow!, except for the price, it's more expensive than a new Rolleiflex FT (I have also seen the 2007 LUG book).Some color images in Flickr look very good. I only need manual controls for shutter speeds and f stops and a good lens to take a photograph,seeing the results in the darkroom if I shoot B&W, this is the way I enjoy photography. The 1937 Contax II has been a nice surprise to me, except for the system to load film, you need to crop the film tab to insert it in the spool. Best regards Carlos --- El mar 13-ene-09, Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió: > De: Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Asunto: [rollei_list] Re: OT Ancient Computers (was Re: Re: Rollei > -Singapore) now analogue versus digital > Para: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fecha: martes, 13 de enero de 2009, 5:38 am > The grains in the emulsion are not that thick. The 3 > dimensionality > you see is, in my opinion, more likely to be an optical > characteristic > than anything to do with grains verses pixels, which I do > not think > differ as greatly as you imply. > I still get a great 3 dimensional look to my pictures using > my Leica > M8 like I did with my M6 on film. IMHO it is a lens > characteristic. > Pity I can't get a digital image from my 3.5f to > compare! > best regards. > Frank > > > On 12 Jan, 2009, at 21:01, Carlos Manuel Freaza wrote: > > > The limit to appreciate the image quality is the human > eye capacity, > > film and digital means have surpassed the human eye > capacity to > > appreciate sharpness differences widely, f.e. the > human eye can't > > distinguish in the monitor screen a digital image at > 24 bits and at > > 48 bits, the human eye can't distinguish a printed > image denser than > > X lines per mm. The issue is the way the observer > perceive the image > > and there is a real difference for grain and pixels, > it is difficult > > or impossible to see in the monitor screen in general, > however a > > well worked analog image has a three dimensions > quality due to the > > grains physical structure absent in the pure pixel > image. > > > > Carlos > > --- El lun 12-ene-09, Frank Dernie > <Frank.Dernie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > escribió: > > > >> De: Frank Dernie > <Frank.Dernie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Asunto: [rollei_list] Re: OT Ancient Computers > (was Re: Re: Rollei - > >> Singapore) now analogue versus digital > >> Para: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Fecha: lunes, 12 de enero de 2009, 5:21 pm > >> Carlos, > >> > >> I have been taking pictures since I was 11, in > 1961. For > >> most of that time I have had my own darkroom. I am > quite > >> aware of what one can do with film, and obviously > better > >> technicians that I can get better results than I. > However > >> the dynamic range of readily available digital > sensors > >> exceeds that of colour films now. The non linear S > shape to > >> the characteristic curve of films does allow more > detail to > >> be seen in either highlights or shadows if so > manipulated. > >> Similar manipulations are possible on digital > files if > >> desired. > >> There is a potential for Moire effects when there > is detail > >> in a scene and resolution in the lens high enough > to exceed > >> the resolution of the sensor. Anti-aliasing > filters are the > >> normal way to avoid this effect, in electronics > too. In the > >> case of photography there are sensors which exceed > the > >> resolution of all but a few of the most > specialised lenses > >> available for the camera. The anti-aliasing filter > is > >> probably not necessary in those cases since the > function is > >> carried out by the lens. My Leica M8 does not have > an anti > >> aliasing filter and I have yet to be unable to > deal with any > >> unfortunate artefacts due to this. Quite the > opposite in > >> fact, I get better results from it than I do from > my > >> theoretically superior Canon EOS 1Ds mk2, thought > that is > >> probably the better lenses. > >> > >> Sharpening can certainly be overdone, but it is > not > >> commonly the case, and I certainly would advise > not to > >> over-sharpen :-) > >> > >> On digital one eventually gets to individual > pixels, like > >> on film one eventually gets to individual grains. > There is a > >> difference but just a question of how you deal > with it, this > >> difference between film and digital is not IMHO > significant. > >> > >> The only area where I have found digital a bit > more > >> difficult than film is in focussing. My M8 is so > much > >> sharper than my M6 with Kodachrome that any small > focussing > >> errors, either due to myself or the dreaded focus > shift on > >> stopping down, are much more troublesome than were > revealed > >> by the somewhat more forgiving softness (and > perhaps > >> variations in flatness???) of film. > >> > >> best regards, > >> Frank > >> > >> > >> On 12 Jan, 2009, at 19:55, Carlos Manuel Freaza > wrote: > >> > >>> Frank, I really can't imagine the way you > use your > >> film cameras to obtain those conclusions. > >>> > >>> Films have personality; DSLRs don't. While > many > >> DSLRs let you dial in higher or lower saturation > and > >> contrast, those crude adjustments can't > compare to the > >> richness of film, whether Velvia's crisp, > saturated look > >> or the delicate tonal shoulder of Tri-X. > (Black-and-white is > >> a particular challenge for digital, especially > in-camera.) > >>> Film can be manipulated to soak up even more > of a > >> scene's tonal extremes. You can rein in > highlights by > >> "pulling," or shortening, the > development of > >> b&w film. You compensate for this by adding > exposure > >> when shooting, improving shadow detail. You can > overexpose > >> color negative film by as much as four stops to > increase > >> shadow detail and reduce contrast, without > damaging > >> highlight nuances. > >>> > >>> Some super-duper digital backs claim to match > or > >> exceed the range captured by film. If you can > afford them, > >> go for it -- and bring along your laptop. > >>> > >>> You can sharpen a digital image in software. > And with > >> most DSLRs you must, because images are > considerably > >> softened by anti-aliasing filters that keep their > sensors > >> from recording jagged edges and moiré patterns. > Yet if you > >> overdo your sharpening, the image can take on a > >> distractingly "crispy" appearance. The > sharpness > >> you get from film is more natural looking. > >>> > >>> (Some parts above were taken from a Pop Photo > article > >> by Russell Hart) > >>> > >>> Digital is very practical to use for a lot of > >> situations and well balanced images look very nice > in the > >> monitor screens, but most of them don't show > the detail > >> richness and tones subtleties you can obtain from > a neg or > >> slide for prints, magazines, projection, books > etc. and > >> I'm talking about a 35mm format. > >>> > >>> Carlos > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> --- El lun 12-ene-09, Frank Dernie > >> <Frank.Dernie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió: > >>> > >>>>> If you shoot large format that can be > true. > >> For medium > >>>> format or what used to be called > "miniature > >>>> format" when I started photography > this is > >> not true. > >>>> The only film parameter which has the > potential be > >> better > >>>> than digital is -perhaps- resolution, but > only > >> very slow > >>>> black and white films in ideal exposure > >> conditions. > >>>> In all other respects digital is superior > - in my > >>>> experience. > >>>> My Rolleiflex 6008i is not capable of > producing > >> colour > >>>> pictures to match those from several of my > digital > >> cameras. > >>>> 35mm has been behind for years. > >>>> I am not aware of -anybody- with in depth > >> experience of > >>>> both who would agree with you. > >>>> Perhaps I am going to get the first > convincing > >> information > >>>> as a result of this email! > >>>> best regards, > >>>> Frank > >>>> > >>>> I am comparing Velvia, Provia, Kodachrome > in > >> Canon, Leica, > >>>> Rollei and Mamiya film cameras (up to > 6x7cm) with > >> digital > >>>> from Leica M8, Canon EOS 1Ds mk2 and Nikon > D3. > >> Most recently > >>>> I have been trying a Nikon D3x but have > not formed > >> any > >>>> conclusions yet since I have not shot with > it > >> enough. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 12 Jan, 2009, at 16:13, Carlos Manuel > Freaza > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> --- El lun 12-ene-09, Frank Dernie > >>>> <Frank.Dernie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > escribió: > >>>>> > >>>>>> In all practical ways digital has > exceeded > >> the > >>>> capability > >>>>>> of film for some time. Certainly > if there > >> is an > >>>> effect which > >>>>>> one wishes to achieve, using a > vintage LF > >> lens for > >>>> example, > >>>>>> film may have to be the choice but > that > >> does not > >>>> make film > >>>>>> better, just an appropriate choice > in some > >>>> circumstances. > >>>>> > >>>>> Film is the best choice when you need > the > >> highest > >>>> image quality.- > >>>>> > >>>>> Carlos > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Yahoo! Cocina > >>>>> Recetas prácticas y comida saludable > >>>>> http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/ > >>>>> --- > >>>>> Rollei List > >>>>> > >>>>> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>>> > >>>>> - Subscribe at > >> rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > >>>> 'subscribe' > >>>>> in the subject field OR by logging > into > >>>> www.freelists.org > >>>>> > >>>>> - Unsubscribe at > >> rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> with > >>>>> 'unsubscribe' in the subject > field OR > >> by > >>>> logging into www.freelists.org > >>>>> > >>>>> - Online, searchable archives are > available at > >>>>> > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> --- > >>>> Rollei List > >>>> > >>>> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> > >>>> - Subscribe at > rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> with > >>>> 'subscribe' > >>>> in the subject field OR by logging into > >> www.freelists.org > >>>> > >>>> - Unsubscribe at > rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> with > >>>> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field > OR by > >> logging > >>>> into www.freelists.org > >>>> > >>>> - Online, searchable archives are > available at > >>>> > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > >>> > >>> > >>> Yahoo! Cocina > >>> Recetas prácticas y comida saludable > >>> http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/ > >>> --- > >>> Rollei List > >>> > >>> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> > >>> - Subscribe at > rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > >> 'subscribe' > >>> in the subject field OR by logging into > >> www.freelists.org > >>> > >>> - Unsubscribe at > rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> with > >>> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR > by > >> logging into www.freelists.org > >>> > >>> - Online, searchable archives are available at > >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > >>> > >> > >> --- > >> Rollei List > >> > >> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > >> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > with > >> 'subscribe' > >> in the subject field OR by logging into > www.freelists.org > >> > >> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > with > >> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by > logging > >> into www.freelists.org > >> > >> - Online, searchable archives are available at > >> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > > > > > Yahoo! Cocina > > Recetas prácticas y comida saludable > > http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/ > > --- > > Rollei List > > > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'subscribe' > > in the subject field OR by logging into > www.freelists.org > > > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > with > > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by > logging into > > www.freelists.org > > > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging > into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list Yahoo! Cocina Recetas prácticas y comida saludable http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/ --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list