Any difference between pyrogen/pyrodex and BP?? tried using pyrogen for ejection bu it seems to burn slower that BP... any truth to that?? S. Battaglia 310-339-2717 Sent from my Rotary iPhone... On Dec 9, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Kenneth Brown <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Spectra > > Ken > > > On Dec 9, 2011, at 9:45 AM, Kurt Gugisberg wrote: > >> According to Wedge, Bryan should use 75' of shock cord. With that much >> you could use kite string and it should still be safe. ;-) >> >> The question is...should it be nylon or Kevlar kite string. >> >> Kurt >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Richard Dierking >> Sent: Dec 9, 2011 9:30 AM >> To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [roc-chat] Re: BP for Deployment of Main Question >> >> Bryan's currently in school otherwise he would answer this himself. Yes, he >> used a parachute for the test and a shorter/lighter shock cord (10', 1000 lb >> vs. 15', 2300 lb). The cord was attached to both parts. He might also be >> extending the shock cord more than 15' for the flight. The ground test was >> energetic and the parachute was deployed nicely. >> >> Richard >> > Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 09:22:19 -0800 >> > From: dmccue@xxxxxxx >> > To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > Subject: [roc-chat] Re: BP for Deployment of Main Question >> > >> > Yay! I hope you also try with the parachute in there as well - it would >> > suck to have the sections separate, but no parachute ejection. (I don't >> > know if the 'chute is attached to both parts, or only one. If attached to >> > both airframe sections, the bridles will puil it out for sure...) >> > >> > -Dave McCue >> > >> > On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Bryan Dierking wrote: >> > >> > > Richard and I just did a ground test with three 2-56 sheer pins and 3.5 >> > > grams in one of the canisters - worked like a charm. >> > > >> > > Bryan Dierking >> > > >> > > >> > > Le Dec 8, 2011 à 16:07, David.P.Smith@xxxxxxx a écrit : >> > > >> > >> Using the table on the web page I listed it came out to 4 grams. His >> > >> table has worked well for me in the past, but I haven't used it on a >> > >> 7.5 inch tube. >> > >> >> > >> Using the bottom formula on that same page and shooting for 10 psid I >> > >> came up with 5.87 grams. Intuitively this seems closer. Of course there >> > >> are various assumptions made that can only be validated with testing. >> > >> >> > >> One assumption in all these equations is 100% conversion of the solid >> > >> black powder into gas. That seems very optimistic. With tightly wrapped >> > >> charges as described by Dave McCue used with shear pins to hold the >> > >> parts together a bit longer, you can produce a pretty substantial >> > >> pressure in the tube before things start to actually move apart. >> > >> >> > >> Ground testing seems like a very good idea to me... >> > >> >> > >> David P Smith >> > >> NAR 78668 L2 >> > >> Amateur Extra, W6DPS >> > >> >> > >> The opinions expressed in this email are my own and do not necessarily >> > >> represent the positions, strategies or opinions of Southern California >> > >> Edison, its parent company Edison International, or any of their >> > >> affiliates. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> From: Richard Dierking <redierking@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> To: "roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> Date: 12/08/2011 12:14 PM >> > >> Subject: [roc-chat] Re: BP for Deployment of Main Question >> > >> Sent by: roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> Let me ask this first: did you come up with 4 grams per cartridge or 4 >> > >> grams total? >> > >> >> > >> Sent from my iPhone >> > >> >> > >> On Dec 8, 2011, at 12:07 PM, David.P.Smith@xxxxxxx wrote: >> > >> >> > >> Large areas can generate very large force if you keep the pressure >> > >> constant. >> > >> >> > >> Think of it this way. For the same length of tube, the diameter >> > >> increases the area and volume by the square of the increase in diameter. >> > >> >> > >> Round off a 4 inch rocket tube to 12.5 square inches times 24 inches in >> > >> length, the volume is 300 cubic inches. >> > >> >> > >> Round off an 8 inch rocket tube to 50 square inches times 24 inches, >> > >> the volume is 1200 cubic inches. Four times the volume of the 4 inch. >> > >> >> > >> So, if a 4 inch diameter body tube 2 feet long is pressurized to 20 >> > >> psid with a given charge, then an 8 inch body tube 2 feet long would be >> > >> pressurized to 5 psid. >> > >> >> > >> 12.5 times 20 psid comes out to 250 pounds of ejection force. 50 times >> > >> 5 comes out to 250 pounds of ejection force. >> > >> >> > >> So for a given ejection charge, in a range of body tube diameters, you >> > >> get the same ejection force. >> > >> >> > >> On the other hand, increasing the charge to four time the 4 inch >> > >> charge, gives us 1000 pounds of ejection force in the 8 inch rocket. >> > >> that may be a bit much... >> > >> >> > >> If you just stick to the formulae published on some sites, you just >> > >> keep increasing the charge size proportional to the increase in volume, >> > >> which may over stress your shock cord. >> > >> >> > >> So how much force do you need to make the rocket come apart? >> > >> >> > >> Do you plan to ground test at all? >> > >> >> > >> David P Smith >> > >> NAR 78668 L2 >> > >> Amateur Extra, W6DPS >> > >> >> > >> The opinions expressed in this email are my own and do not necessarily >> > >> represent the positions, strategies or opinions of Southern California >> > >> Edison, its parent company Edison International, or any of their >> > >> affiliates. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> From: Richard Dierking <redierking@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> To: "roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> Date: 12/08/2011 11:36 AM >> > >> Subject: [roc-chat] Re: BP for Deployment of Main Question >> > >> Sent by: roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> Wow, 4 grams BP is about one half what we were coming up using the web >> > >> and a reference book I had. >> > >> Richard >> > >> Sent from my iPhone >> > >> >> > >> On Dec 8, 2011, at 11:26 AM, "Chris J Kobel" <Chris.J.Kobel@xxxxxxxx> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> I would second David's recommendation of 4 grams, which should give >> > >> about 200 lbs of ejection force at 5000 AGL, with the 3 2-56 shear pins >> > >> requiring about 100 lbf to overcome. >> > >> >> > >> Chris >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> From: David.P.Smith@xxxxxxx >> > >> To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> Date: 12/08/2011 11:10 AM >> > >> Subject: [roc-chat] Re: BP for Deployment of Main Question >> > >> Sent by: roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> I use the "rule of thumb" on this site. >> > >> >> > >> http://www.vernk.com/EjectionChargeSizing.htm >> > >> >> > >> So, by that site you would need 4 grams of ffffg black powder. >> > >> >> > >> Remember that you are looking at a lot of area to apply the ejection >> > >> pressure to. A 7.5 inch circle had a bit over 23.5 square inches of >> > >> are. So 10 psid will give you 235 pounds of ejection force. >> > >> >> > >> What is the shear force rating for your pins? >> > >> >> > >> David P Smith >> > >> NAR 78668 L2 >> > >> Amateur Extra, W6DPS >> > >> The opinions expressed in this email are my own and do not necessarily >> > >> represent the positions, strategies or opinions of Southern California >> > >> Edison, its parent company Edison International, or any of their >> > >> affiliates. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> From: Richard Dierking <redierking@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> To: <roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> Date: 12/08/2011 10:10 AM >> > >> Subject: [roc-chat] BP for Deployment of Main Question >> > >> Sent by: roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> Say your main deployment section is 7.5" diameter, 24" long and using >> > >> three (3) 2-56 nylon shear pins. How much BP? >> > >> >> > >> Also, what's the advantage of using two or more deployment canisters >> > >> instead of just one? For multiple canisters, would you wire in series >> > >> or parallel? (One 9 volt battery and Perfectflite WD altimeter with >> > >> main deployment at 1100'.) >> > >> >> > >> Richard Dierking >> > >> BTW: Kurt, we're not intending to turn the nose into a second stage :-) >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- ROC-Chat mailing list roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat >> > >> -- ROC-Chat mailing list roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat >> > >> -- ROC-Chat mailing list roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat >> > > >> -- ROC-Chat mailing list roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat > > > -- > ROC-Chat mailing list > roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat > -- ROC-Chat mailing list roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat