[roc-chat] Re: BP for Deployment of Main Question

  • From: Richard Dierking <redierking@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 21:31:49 +0000

I've had the police respond one time because the HOA called them.  The officer 
was here about 1/2 hour because he thought it was so cool.  Next time, I might 
not get someone that thinks it's cool. Richard
 > Subject: [roc-chat] Re: BP for Deployment of Main Question
> From: allen.farrington@xxxxxx
> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 13:29:10 -0800
> To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Richard -
> 
> By now, if your neighbors are still freaked out by small explosions, then you 
> should move. ;-0
> 
> Allen
> 
> On Dec 8, 2011, at 1:22 PM, Richard Dierking wrote:
> 
> > Other than the time it takes for a ground test and that sometimes stuff is 
> > damaged and must be repaired; there are other considerations.  Some of my 
> > neighbors are already a little freaked out about the large rocket projects. 
> >  So, setting off a 4 gram BP charge would not be advised.  We could go to a 
> > City park, but previously, we were asked to leave by the City's park 
> > enforcement officer (details only around the campfire).  If we did the test 
> > at a school field, I would probably end up in Quatmo.
> >  
> > So, between advice, formulas, and our gut, we'll come up with the correct 
> > amount.  ;)
> >  
> > Richard 
> > To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [roc-chat] Re: BP for Deployment of Main Question
> > From: Chris.J.Kobel@xxxxxxxx
> > Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 12:59:56 -0800
> > 
> > Here's the relationships I use:   (I believe Dave Flynn is the source) 
> > 
> > E-charges: BP(g)=.00051xLength(in)xForce(lb)x(Peak Alt ASL/10K+1) ; 150-200 
> > lbs                                 
> > 2-56 nylon bolts for shear pins;  35 lbs shear force each;  100 lbs w/o 
> > pins, 200 lbs with         
> > 
> > Only separation force, length, and altitude are input variables.   The 
> > diameter factors out. 
> > 
> > Time for a ground test.... 
> > 
> > Chris                         
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > From:        Richard Dierking <redierking@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
> > To:        "roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> > Date:        12/08/2011 12:44 PM 
> > Subject:        [roc-chat] Re: BP for Deployment of Main Question 
> > Sent by:        roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > So Dave, how much BP would you suggest for a 7.5" diameter x 24" long 
> > compartment with three 2-56 shear pins?
> > Richard 
> > 
> > Sent from my iPhone
> > 
> > On Dec 8, 2011, at 12:19 PM, "Dave McCue" <dmccue@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Please remember that electric match makers alway say to put matches in 
> > > series - it takes no more than a 1.5V AA cell to light one, so putting 
> > > two or three in series is no problem. THis also solves the problem of 
> > > monitoring two or more matches, sine a loss of continuity anywhere will 
> > > be detected by the electronics.
> > > 
> > > I do series match wiring all the time when I use multiple ematches to 
> > > light big liquid propulsion engines. See links below:
> > > 
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlkMiCtCxg0&feature=related
> > > 
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOiaxfGpudM
> > > 
> > > You can also see the unusual recovery system I came up with for these 
> > > rockets: side deployed! This is because the rocket is big and heavy, and 
> > > needs to land on it's side to avoid unplanned damage; we assume we will 
> > > break two fins upon landing.
> > > 
> > > By the way, the big 1000 square-foot parachute is deployed by BP charges 
> > > that push out the pilot chute, with HPR recovery electronics making the 
> > > decisions. This was one of several low altitude flights to test the 
> > > recovery system.
> > > 
> > > Dave McCue
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Richard Dierking wrote:
> > > 
> > >> 
> > >> One possible failure mode:  If it's in parallel, if one of the matches 
> > >> is bad and doesn't have continuity, you will not know, because the 
> > >> altimeter will detect continuity in the second and indicate that 
> > >> everything looks OK.  So one canister would go, but probably not be 
> > >> enough BP for a successful deployment.   We tested two matches in series 
> > >> yesterday, and they both went fine.  I've been using series for 
> > >> airstarts and haven't had a problem (up to 4 engines).  I thought people 
> > >> were crazy when I first heard about using series, but when a match 
> > >> lights the "plasma ball" becomes very conductive for a moment.  However, 
> > >> I have not used series for deployment charges, so thought it would be a 
> > >> good idea to hear from people that had experience with this. Richard > 
> > >> From:xsive.guy@xxxxxxxxx
> > >>> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 10:39:46 -0800
> > >>> Subject: [roc-chat] Re: BP for Deployment of Main Question
> > >>> To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>> 
> > >>> Definitely in parallel.  Otherwise, when the first one burns out the
> > >>> rest would stop getting current.  By wiring them in parallel even
> > >>> after the first one goes the rest continue to get current.
> > >>> 
> > >>> I'd like to know the answers to your other questions though.
> > >>> 
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Mike
> > >>> 
> > >>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Richard Dierking
> > >>> <redierking@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>>> Say your main deployment section is 7.5" diameter, 24" long and using 
> > >>>> three
> > >>>> (3) 2-56 nylon shear pins.  How much BP?
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Also, what's the advantage of using two or more deployment canisters 
> > >>>> instead
> > >>>> of just one?  For multiple canisters, would you wire in series or 
> > >>>> parallel?
> > >>>> (One 9 volt battery and Perfectflite WD altimeter with main deployment 
> > >>>> at
> > >>>> 1100'.)
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Richard Dierking
> > >>>> BTW: Kurt, we're not intending to turn the nose into a second stage :-)
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> 
> > >>> 
> > >>> --
> > >>> ROC-Chat mailing list
> > >>> roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>> //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat
> > >>> 
> > >> 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > ROC-Chat mailing list
> > > roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > ROC-Chat mailing list
> > roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ROC-Chat mailing list
> roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat
> 
                                          

Other related posts: