[pure-silver] Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: Jeffrey Krenzel <jkrenzel@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:04:41 -0800 (PST)
Ryuji,
I am sorry, but I don't understand your question.
Perhaps a verb is missing. In any case, I suggested
that Gene look at this other list because the list
members would sometimes consider questions regarding
POP and/or paper negatives, which I don't remember
seeing discussed on this list or its predecessor.
Jeffrey
--- Ryuji Suzuki <rs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Jeffrey Krenzel <jkrenzel@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: POP with paper negs?
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:13:27 -0800 (PST)
>
> > You might wish to ask this question on the
> alternative
> > process weblist. Assuming that they still exist
> (I
> > have not subscribed in some time), they are a
> wealth
> > of information regarding non-silver alternative
> > processes and are very helpful.
>
> When the silver gelatin process becomes an
> alternative process? Among
> my immediate friends, there are as many cyanotypists
> and van dyke
> users as silver gelatin users.
>
> --
> Ryuji Suzuki
> "Keep a good head and always carry a light camera."
>
=============================================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to
> www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the
> same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
