[pure-silver] Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: "Gene Johnson" <genej2@xxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:06:33 -0800
A good point that I hadn't considered. Maybe I'll have to make a test print
for maximum black and whitest white and check it with my light meter?
I read somewhere that the density range is something like the difference in
stops divided by three (?)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryuji Suzuki" <rs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 5:50 AM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: POP with paper negs?
> From: "Gene Johnson" <genej2@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: POP with paper negs?
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 05:44:47 -0800
>
> > I did some hunting around on the Kodak and Ilford sites and it looks
like
> > their widest range papers max out at around 2.1 or 2.2 if I'm reading
right.
> > Like you said, kinda at the edge. I'm not ready to try this yet, but
I'm
> > thinking about it. Thanks Ryuji.
>
> The thing is that those are reflection density. Light passes through
> the emulsion twice in that case. But if you are using it as a
> negative, you need to judge density and contrast by transmission
> density, where light passes only once.
> --
> Ryuji Suzuki
> "Keep a good head and always carry a light camera."
>
============================================================================
=================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
